※ 引述《KevinLan (Posaunenblaeser)》之銘言：
: ※ 引述《santayana (不畏浮雲遮望眼)》之銘言：
: : 之前的文章沒有仔細看，如果你們是在討論奏鳴曲式的話，
: : 那麼呈示部是一定要反覆的，A A B A,起、承、轉、合。
: 學長是說貝多芬第一號的第二樂章...
: 不知道是不是奏鳴曲式?
: ( 啦啦啦～ 我對第一號超不熟... )
The purpose of "story(I), story(II),..." is to illustrate some
approaches that we can try while thinking or performing a composer's
work. Of course I did not try to illustrate anything in "story(I)"
because I think a story alone is a good starting point.
In "story(II)" I did try to illustrate a point of view. Which is
to consider the role of performer and composer. I did not mean to
force an answer. No one has to know what Beethoven's symphony #1 is
about while reading "story(II)". I just want to say some greatest
conductors did not follow what Beethoven wrote. I just want to
expose this fact.
Please let me know if you feel very difficult to follow whatever
I wrote. I want to make my words easy to understand. I write English,
that is bad enough, and I don't want to make my words difficult because
I would like to introduce simple ideas. Of course, there may be no
simple answer to those ideas.
2nd mov. of a symphony is not sonata form. There may be some weird
exceptions, of course I haven't seen one. The 2nd mov. of Beethoven
symphony #1 is either ternary form or binary form. I don't remember
because it's been a long time since I listen to that piece last time.
(and.... what is the difference between binary and ternary forms?
I am not sure either. I forget things easily, or, I never understand
that very well.)
Hsuan-Yi Chen
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.twbbs.org)
◆ From: delta.phyast.pi