※ 引述《epipole (pole)》之銘言：
: ※ 引述《walaykao (Age of Madness)》之銘言：
: : That is due to the pitchers, not small ball.
: 贏或輸 本來就是 Pitching 和 Hitting 共同的結果.
: Let's look at a number - LOB in ALDS.
: Total LOB:
: Yankees vs Angels
: 43 26
: Red Sox vs White Sox
: 22 11
: Yankees and Red Sox 殘壘數 較 對方高出甚多,
: "製造得分"的能力明顯較弱.
: : 用最簡單的方式來說，假設有兩支球隊，他們的投手表現差不多，但其中一支球隊
: : 一整年可以打下 886 分，另一支球隊只有 741 分，哪一支球隊會贏比較多？
: : 得分比較多不保證贏，難道得分比較少反而比較會贏？
: 舉個例子給你, 今年球季:
: Team Run W-L
: Boston 900 95-67
: NYY 885 95-67
: Texas 861 79-83
: Cleveland 789 93-61
: Oakland 764 88-74
: LAA 754 95-67
: CWS 738 99-63
: Again,
: Leading run scores in team statistics does not guarantee "Wins".
Man, this is like one of those GRE "critical thinking" essays where they
give you this paragraph full of holes to pick apart.
This logic has more holes than a piece of Swiss Cheese at Columbine High
http://www.baseball-reference.com/teams/NYY/2005.shtml
http://www.baseball-reference.com/teams/LAA/2005.shtml
http://www.baseball-reference.com/teams/CHW/2005.shtml
http://www.baseball-reference.com/teams/BOS/2005.shtml
http://www.baseball-reference.com/teams/TEX/2005.shtml
I actually have no stake in this, as I WOULD like to see the Yanks bunt more
often so they'd lose more, but this is so damn stupid my head almost exploded
after reading it.
How could runs scored not have a POSTIVE CORRELATION on winning?
Heard of PYTHAGORAS???????????????????????????????
You know how when you posted runs scored with relation to win numbers,
they don't correlate? BECAUSE THEY'RE NOT THE ONLY FACTOR INVOLVED!
Teams win more when they score runs. But they lose more when they GIVE UP
MORE RUNS
If you looked at RUNS SCORED with relation to RUNS GIVEN UP... ok if you can't
figure out the rest on your own, too bad.
--
如果醫學是我的妻子，那棒球就是我的情婦.
Tony Chiu, NTU Med 91
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.112.212.196