作者vegas (買雞頭貴過買松阪牛?)
站內NY-Yankees
標題Re: [新聞] BA對大單位交易的討論
時間Thu Jan 11 16:25:44 2007
※ 引述《richertkk (黃家大少)》之銘言:
: 只有最後一段算是評論吧..
: 大意上是講..
: 洋基應該是有賺.WHY???..
: 因為我們把一個43歲而且又很貴的投手,同時他的一切數據都已經在下降
: 換來一個有實力的中繼投手,和幾位新秀.
: 所以應該是我們小贏..他們小輸..
: ※ 引述《LiviaH (人生不過洗牌一場)》之銘言:
: : http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/majors/news/263085.html
節錄一下,BP Joe Sheehan的看法
[snip]
It's not easy to make a deal with the Diamondbacks and not come out of it
with some upside, but that's what the Yankees have done. They've added to
their stash of college-draftee pitchers—remember, they took Ian Kennedy and
Joba Chamberlain in last year's draft—who don't project as stars, and added
a utility-infield prospect and some relief help.
..........
This deal is a good win for the Diamondbacks, who are closer to contention in
the NL West than most people realize. By adding a good starting pitcher—
remember, PECOTA projects Johnson to have a 3.52 ERA this season—in exchange
for four guys they'll never miss and some cash, they've improved the 2007
team for, essentially, nothing. They didn't trade any of their top ten
prospects, not even guys down the list like Micah Owings or Dustin Nippert.
This deal closes the gap between them and the Padres and Dodgers, and pretty
much ensures at least a three-team race in the West.
[snip]
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 202.154.192.30
推 Baudelaire:Sheehan這樣說太bias了.. 01/11 17:10
推 agoodjob:樓上英文很good耶.. 01/11 17:17
推 vegas:我猜一樓說的是雙關語? 01/11 17:25
推 bestard:沒看到全文,但我和一樓同感,太偏頗了 01/12 00:58
推 newbornme:Sheehan完全是看PECOTA的成績給評論的,但是PECOTA的成 01/13 06:40
→ newbornme:績不見得能真實反應RJ的快速衰老狀態。 01/13 06:41