Re: [閒聊] A-Rod 再見滿貫砲

[chenbiyi (該怎麼選擇呢)]

我為我第一篇"不負責的言論"向A-Rod及各位球迷道歉

不想狡辯什麼，就是這樣


http://yankeesetc.blogspot.com/2007/01/is-arod-clutch.html

這篇文章可以解答一些人的疑問
若有人有更詳盡和其他打者的比較，歡迎提供

Some people say that an RBI in the 1st inning is just as important as an RBI
in the 9th inning. It’s true that a run is a run, but ‘clutch’ hits in
late innings are more likely to ensure a win only because there are fewer
innings to play: when a team takes a lead in inning 1, it probably has about
a 60-70% chance of winning - when it takes a lead in innings 7-9, that
probability must go up to 80-100%. I don’t have the exact data, but it’s
easy to understand this idea. Late, close RBIs are more important than early
RBIs.

有些人好像覺得前六局打的好  後三局就可以爛?

或是前六局好  後三局爛就不能罵?

事實上7/8/9局落後三分內的AVG分別是0.219/0.235/0.306

是不是又有人要說七八局的投手本來就比第九局強

我希望各位球迷是為了要鞭我而鞭我，不是真的覺得A-Rod已經沒有缺點了

Rather interesting. The biggest difference is Arod's tied OPS. Before New
York, it was 99 points higher than his overall OPS. Since joining New York,
it is 4 points lower than his overall OPS. Meanwhile, his 'trailing' OPS has
been lower than his overall OPS throughout his career. But the only area
where he improved since joing New York is his 'leading' OPS. This is why some
critics say Arod does all his production when the Yanks are already ahead.
來洋基後唯一進步而沒退步的是領先時的OPS

有個網友的評論蠻有趣的:
Don't show these numbers to the A-Rod supporters on here. You'll hear about
how you "hate" A-Rod, that you "don't know what you're talking about," and
that you're generally lower than a man who eats babies and that A-Rod is a
misunderstood genius who would be curing AIDS if he wasn't hitting a baseball
for the Yankees.

--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) 
◆ From: 72.89.215.20
推 aniwufa:那個80%~~100%的機率根本就包含前面幾局的貢獻
→ aniwufa:這種說法根本就是廢話
推 speeddd:搬救兵了?
→ PURELOVEGAE:國外的鄉民也是一堆，你引述國外球迷的看法並沒有比較
→ PURELOVEGAE:有說服力。除非你的論證方法很完整，不然你也只是丟出
→ PURELOVEGAE:一些不營養的結論罷了。
推 roger744:哇靠..第九局落後三分內avg友0.306  真是關鍵XDDD
→ roger744:明明就是七八局爛 後三局爛的說法是怎來的?
→ roger744:套句中職的說法 第九局才是關鍵中的關鍵阿~所以7.8局爛有
推 iq4zaf:無言 得分有分哪一局得分比較重要的嗎
→ roger744:什麼關係呢? 第九局才是關鍵阿~以後你就簽一堆只有第九局
→ roger744:打得好的吧! 成績本來就要看整體 每個人都會有起伏 不只
→ roger744:A-Rod 還有人分割來看的 根本就雞蛋裡挑骨頭
→ roger744:你去看看洋基先發九棒每局打擊率有沒有依樣再來說吧
推 roger744:假設Jeter第六局打擊率比較低 我是不是也可以說 比賽要進
→ roger744:入中後半段的關鍵時期打不好 這個球員真是弱! 要砲大家都
→ roger744:會砲
推 sciv:還頗想噓，A-Rod有沒有缺點跟鞭你似乎是你先挑起。
推 DesertEagleX:只要是美語就能夠相信的話 那跟夜店裡看到白人就流口
→ DesertEagleX:水想要哈洋屌的台灣美眉有什麼兩樣
推 asdfzx:推樓上 >.<
推 zilchide:我好歹念到研究所英文也不是不好～
→ zilchide:但是連結一看到是英文鄉民文我就不想看～
→ zilchide:為甚麼不跟其他選手做比較,有很多人贏A-Rod才能說服大家
推 tsming:以為落英文嘴砲就大管了嗎？科科XD
推 davic:為什麼我看到這篇會有想噓的念頭＝　＝
推 rayven:因為道歉得很沒誠意，一開頭說抱歉後面又開始狡辯