精華區beta NY-Yankees 關於我們 聯絡資訊
Wang to Earn $4 Million After Arbitration Loss By JACK CURRY Published: February 16, 2008 TAMPA, Fla. — Chien-Ming Wang experienced his first loss since a forgettable postseason Friday when he lost his arbitration case to the Yankees. Wang, who had been seeking $4.6 million this season, will earn $4 million, the amount the Yankees offered him. Even after Alan Nero, Wang’s agent, offered to split the difference, the Yankees were not interested. Although the Yankees won their first arbitration case in eight years, they could have risked offending Wang, their No. 1 starter. General Manager Brian Cashman said he was not worried, noting that Wang received the highest arbitration award ever for a first-time eligible pitcher. “There was no reason to go higher than four,” Cashman said. “Settling at the midpoint because of an inflated file number would have made no sense.” Nero said: “The disappointment here is the Yankees made little or no effort to settle. We move on and now it’s time to play baseball.” Wang, who has won 38 games in the last two seasons, wanted to sign a long-term contract. But the Yankees told Wang that he must wait because a pitcher’s health can be fragile. Because second baseman Robinson Cano signed a four-year, $30 million deal and Wang has almost the identical service time, Nero pushed for multiyear contract but was rebuffed. Before Wang knew that he had lost his case, he told Taiwanese reporters that he viewed going through arbitration as a “learning process” because he would hear about the areas in which the Yankees thought he needed to improve. “If we lose, I’ll have to move on and concentrate on the season,” said Wang, who earned $489,500 in 2007. http://tinyurl.com/2vyjt9 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 140.109.231.95
decorum:That Oct meltdown really hurts. Great attitude though. 02/16 19:35
ponzpons:推樓上! 02/16 19:52
hergan:唉= = 今年投個超水準爭個 8M+吧 02/16 20:20
bruceismeok:能翻譯一下嗎..我在練習翻譯..但好多都不會翻..請教>< 02/17 15:54
sandpaper:看不懂Cashman說的= =.....我好遜 02/17 16:13
bruceismeok:我也是=_= 02/17 16:21
zadla2002:不太懂 Cashman的意思+1 02/17 19:45
groccy:應該是這個意思:"沒有理由超過四百萬, 因為(勞方提出的)過 02/17 19:59
groccy:高的仲裁薪資而把薪資調整到勞資雙方的中間值是沒有意義的 02/17 20:00
groccy:不是很通順XD 希望能看得懂 02/17 20:02
zadla2002:了解 感謝您 02/18 07:48