==> 在 Copper.bbs@bbs.ntu.edu.tw (Holiday Blue) 的文章中提到:
> ==> csddd (極度自信與自戀) 提到:
> > 我想,你完全誤會了。
> > 科學的實驗常常是先有初步實驗結果,然後大膽的提出假設,
> not very often in human science
> > 接著再去印證這樣子的假設對不對,如果接下來的實驗說明了
> > 之前的假設不對的話,那就要再做實驗,再依新的實驗結果來
> > 產生假設,然後再實驗再實驗去印證新的假設,
> > 如此重覆,直到產生正確的理論與實驗結果一致
> > 所以,在這項實驗中,並非先認定了某一種機制,事實上,我們到現在
> > 還不知道是由大腦的哪個部分來控制的,而很明顯的,人體的所有行為
> > 都是由大腦來控制的,所以才找了神經科醫生由此著手ꄊ> However, there is no mechanism and tissue evidence between the finger and
> the brain :)
> You must inevitably propose one, don't you?
> Then, you have to propose another theory to explain why the current knowledge
> in cell biology cannot identify the presumed mechanism draw from your
> experiments.
> In short, are you saying that there is something other than nerve between
> finger and brain??
> Or,
> there is another unidentified receptor in finger??
> Or,
> finger transfer the information via none of the human tissue??
> Or, whatever....????
這個事件, 我覺得從氣功去著手可能會快些。所以第一件事應該是
把氣的現象了解透澈。不過這應該挪到生物版去討論了。
--
* Post by gw from 61-222-168-110.HINET-IP.hinet.net
* Origin: ★ 交通大學資訊科學系 BBS ★ <bbs.cis.nctu.edu.tw: 140.113.23.3>