推 physheepy:I suggest you revise your article again. There are 01/11 02:23
→ physheepy:many mistakes. I'll help to give more advice when I 01/11 02:24
→ physheepy:have free time. Most important of all, I don't think 01/11 02:26
→ physheepy:Newton interpreted light as particles. This concept 01/11 02:28
推 physheepy:was under debate and has no conclusion for several 01/11 02:40
→ physheepy:century. (sorry, I miss some words. ~~ light as part 01/11 02:41
→ physheepy:-ticles in a right way.) 01/11 02:44
→ physheepy:so I don't think "found" is appropriate here 01/11 02:46
→ corson:Thank you, but I don't know the mistakes mean grammar 01/11 09:50
→ corson:problem or the description about Newton. I know "found" 01/11 09:53
→ corson:is not a appropriate word beccause I don't know much 01/11 09:54
→ corson:word to this. I wrote this by my impression only. 01/11 09:56
→ corson:If your mistakes mean this, I will be to this direction 01/11 10:03
→ corson:to revise. If it is grammar problems, please forgive me 01/11 10:07
→ corson:it is difficult to find my mistakes myself. I need some 01/11 10:08
→ corson:help. Thanks for your reply and be willing give me 01/11 10:10
→ corson:advice, that will push me post more article here. 01/11 10:12
推 oplz:這篇英文太 中式 了. 01/11 13:22