[題目] 假設語氣

[simplezepher (受驗の神樣)]

題目：
        Were the ice of Greenland and Antarctica to melt,average sea level
       ____________ at least 00 feet.
        (A)     would have rise
        (B)     would rise
        (C)     wiil have risen
        (D)     had risen

疑問:答案B  南極融化應該有可能發生吧 為啥不是用簡單是代替未來式
  還有他原本沒倒裝的形式是怎樣呢?

--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) 
◆ From: 61.229.14.188
推 dgas:If the ice of Greenland and Antarctica to melt,average
→ dgas:sea level would rise at least 00 feet.
→ dgas:to前面少打上were
推 bingo057:假設語氣前面是were表跟現在事實相反,後面用過去助V+原V
推 bingo057:少看到to, were to 表跟未來相反,後面一樣用過去助V+原V
推 JolySaturn:因為有were 所以題目是認為這件事與現在事實相反
→ JolySaturn:句型: If 主詞 were ... , 主詞 would 原V ...
推 dgas:這一題不是跟現在事實相反 if+...were to代表未來的想像情況
→ dgas:惟可能性很低 或是使用在提出有禮貌的建議"你能不能坐過去點"
→ dgas:這樣