→ Seles:雖然是轉錄,還是777元:PP 推 61.64.102.194 05/29
→ zerkchu:恩寫的不太好... :p thanks. 推 203.219.101.22 05/29
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------- <
作者: establish (Est) 看板: Tennis
標題: Re: [轉錄]第11顆種子掉落--9 韓娃
時間: Thu May 29 14:08:16 2003
: 這場比賽真的很精采,Harkleroad第三盤一度*5-1領先,但還是犯了新秀的大賽心理素質欠
: 佳的毛病失誤連連或是不太敢打,讓Hantuchova又再度穩定性回來,連續丟掉5局之後換
: Hantuchova發球要拿下比賽時,沒想到集中力突然又回來,連續幾個球打的很低且深讓韓娃
: 失誤起來於是竟然破發回來6-6. 接下來一段時間纏鬥之後最後Hantuchova在自己的發球局
: 失誤還是過多輸掉比賽...
At 5:2 Hantuchova played well she hit 3 clean winners pass Harleroad,
Hantuchova was the one who is dictating the play, it is either she make
winner or missed the line completely.
: Harkleroad的打法我覺得其實跟一般新秀沒有差太多,都是底線攻擊型,打的落點今天跟韓
: 娃比起來還是略差一點,不過跟一些俄國新秀比起來防守的功夫作的比較好一點,發球則偏
: 弱一點,這是她今天常常被Hantuchova攻的一點...而Hantuchova今天的表現其實沒有那麼
: 差,但是關鍵時刻失誤太多輸了這場比賽..
: by zerkchu
Harleroad is more of defensive player in the mode of Clijsters, she is not
a shotmaker as Hantuchova is, when on song Hantuchova is simply beautiful to
watch. By her own standard Hantuchova did play badly, she simply did not have
any consistancy in her game to win the match but she was close. 101 errors
in a 3 hours and 3 sets match is not acceptable by any standard, think this
way 101 errors equals 2.65 points in every game to your opponent,so you always
start at 0:30 on your service game and 30:0 on your opponets service game.
So there is no question Hantuchova played a bad match. A bad match is not
indicated by the closeness of the result but what a player did over the
length of thematch.
by jliang
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.csie.ntu.edu.tw)
◆ From: 61.64.102.194
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------- <
作者: establish (Est) 看板: Tennis
標題: Re: [轉錄]第11顆種子掉落--9 韓娃
時間: Thu May 29 14:09:52 2003
: At 5:2 Hantuchova played well she hit 3 clean winners pass Harleroad,
: Hantuchova was the one who is dictating the play, it is either she make
: winner or missed the line completely.
嗯不過那時很明顯可以看的出來Harkleroad章法都打亂了. 讓Hantuchova重新把穩定性
找回來.
: Harleroad is more of defensive player in the mode of Clijsters, she is not
: a shotmaker as Hantuchova is, when on song Hantuchova is simply beautiful to
: watch. By her own standard Hantuchova did play badly, she simply did not have
: any consistancy in her game to win the match but she was close. 101 errors
: in a 3 hours and 3 sets match is not acceptable by any standard, think this
: way 101 errors equals 2.65 points in every game to your opponent,so you always
: start at 0:30 on your service game and 30:0 on your opponets service game.
: So there is no question Hantuchova played a bad match. A bad match is not
: indicated by the closeness of the result but what a player did over the
: length of thematch.
: by jliang
嗯Hantuchova的確沒有打出最佳水準但是並沒有那麼差,她沒失誤時打的出來的球也是都
很漂亮. 所以我不覺得她是打得極差.
至於關於數據的問題,今年法網每一場的UE都非常多,所以我是覺得認定上有一點問題.
不可否認的Hantuchova失誤是很多,但是我覺得是沒到100多個errros那麼多. 以數據來
看Harkleroad全場總共拿到133分,官網上紀錄106個UE加上Harkleroad本身16個winner
外加Hantuchova的6個雙發失誤,計算下來Harkleroad變成只有5分是forced errors,
我個人覺得是不太可能的...
總之我是覺得Hantuchova打的是不好但是沒有極糟糕,全場還有42個winners.
by zerkchu
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.csie.ntu.edu.tw)
◆ From: 61.64.102.194
※ 編輯: establish 來自: 61.64.102.194 (05/29 14:10)
→ Seles:777元! 推 61.64.102.194 05/29
→ zerkchu:嗯不過這篇真的是寫的有錯誤,所以被反駁哈 推 203.219.101.22 05/29
→ establish:我覺得良性的討論,不過說對或說錯都是好 推 61.64.102.194 05/29
→ establish:文:p 推 61.64.102.194 05/29
→ chairman:前幾輪UE多很正常吧:) 推140.112.120.213 05/29
→ establish:主要討論其實是互動的…:) 推 61.64.102.194 05/29
→ zerkchu:嗯不過今年的確很多場比賽失誤都太多了,讓 推 203.219.101.22 05/29
→ zerkchu:人懷疑... 推 203.219.101.22 05/29
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------- <
作者: establish (Est) 看板: Tennis
標題: Re: [轉錄]第11顆種子掉落--9 韓娃
時間: Thu May 29 14:13:06 2003
: 嗯Hantuchova的確沒有打出最佳水準但是並沒有那麼差,她沒失誤時打的出來的球也是都
: 很漂亮. 所以我不覺得她是打得極差.
: 至於關於數據的問題,今年法網每一場的UE都非常多,所以我是覺得認定上有一點問題.
: 不可否認的Hantuchova失誤是很多,但是我覺得是沒到100多個errros那麼多. 以數據來
: 看Harkleroad全場總共拿到133分,官網上紀錄106個UE加上Harkleroad本身16個winner
: 外加Hantuchova的6個雙發失誤,計算下來Harkleroad變成只有5分是forced errors,
: 我個人覺得是不太可能的...
: 總之我是覺得Hantuchova打的是不好但是沒有極糟糕,全場還有42個winners.
: by zerkchu
The problem is DH is really good in patches, when she is good Harkleroad
just simply could not do anything effectively. I do think the official stats
is quite accurate,look there is 106 UE and double fault is also included in
this stats column, so Harkleroad has forced DH into errors not 5 times but
11 times which is not far wrong considering Harkleroad was never a forceful
player as Hantuchova is. Overall this is a bad for Hantuchova, she had her
chances and she dug her own hole because she loss her consistancy on her shots
and then she fought back only to lose the match.
The pattern of this match is DH would come out smoking and blast winners all
over the court and then she would play some terrible games and then she lift
herself again, this is a sign of a player who lacks confidence. DH is
obviously more talented than Harleroad in almost every part of her game except
probably her defensive skills.
by jliang
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.csie.ntu.edu.tw)
◆ From: 61.64.102.194