精華區beta Tennis 關於我們 聯絡資訊
※ 引述《krajicek (終於等到CoCo的新歌了)》之銘言: : Roddick大逆轉!這場比賽或許會有蠻多爭議的,但這就是網球, : 一些誤判在所難免,球員唯一能做的就是儘量不讓誤判影響心情。 : 比賽前半段Nalbandian打得確實出色,自己的底線穩定不說,搭配 : 一些多元化的球技前後左右去拼命調動Roddick,發球局守得很紮實; : 加上在接發球上他採取了類似Federer那樣四兩撥千金的方法用擋、切 : 球的方式,去一點一滴消磨Roddick的戰力。這個戰術一直到第三盤都 : 還算成功,Roddick打得很悶,那段期間Roddick失誤還挺多的,也連帶 : 使觀眾high不太起來。又或者說,Roddick在鼓動現場觀眾情緒上還缺 : 了那麼一絲感染力,他似乎一開始對自己太有信心,所以覺得沒必要去 : 讓觀眾high,但等到察覺不對時,Nalbandian已經打出信心,想再壓下 : 他就很累了,這一點是值得Roddick警惕的。 這點我倒是不太能夠認同,關於Roddick為什麼沒有像以前一樣喜歡帶動觀眾氣氛, 是因為前幾天所發生的那一件事哪!因為對手說不喜歡他撩撥球迷的情緒, 所以Roddick在這場情緒上的表現就含蓄許多了,像是他在贏得第五盤的勝利時, 也沒有像前幾場比賽一樣將心中的喜悅特別表現出來,不過Roddick在前兩盤 打的不好是事實,只是在面臨對手的賽末點時,又被場上白目的球迷給害慘了, 其實後來那個爭議球有重播很多次,其實本來就是out,我覺得Roddick贏得乾淨 ,而且他也真的是一個很努力的球員,不過經過這一役,可能這件事又會被人拿 來大作文章了,剛剛看espn,若我沒聽錯的話,新聞是說小班也在賽後發了點牢 騷,而內容就是說,這場準決賽只要是very close point,結果都是判給Roddick 得利,唉!我可憐的小Roddick,這下子你連跳到黃河都洗不清了... : 而Roddick會逆轉的關鍵,我的看法是他在第三盤確實保住自己的 : 發球局,採用「以拖待變」的方式,畢竟他是先發球者,有了這個優勢 : 下,先守住自己再伺機進攻,這是在對付氣勢上升的對手最基本的招數 : 。且不要忽略了Roddick還有一項優勢:體能,在平常或許還佔不到優 : 勢,畢竟小班也是體能一級棒。但Roddick之前有多出一天休息時間, : 而Nalbandian卻是連打第三天了,加上前面幾回合他都打得很辛苦下, : 其體能狀態也不可能不下降。Nalbandian在第三盤後段其實失誤率也逐 : 步上升,只是那時候他氣勢旺,所以可能還不感疲累,但第三盤被A-Rod : 撐過之後,感覺上Nalbandian的體能就下滑的很快了,失誤率也越來越 : 高,且其情緒也確實有受到第三盤搶七爭議的影響;而Roddick正好相 : 反,氣勢上升、觀眾情緒也成功挑起,加上保留的體能也比較充裕之下 : ,Roddick後面兩盤可說是再度找回比賽節奏,會逆轉也就不足為奇了! : Nalbandian確實輸得可惜,這次比賽他展現出他有大滿貫爭勝的本 : 錢,但心理素質這方面也還是他必須要更努力的地方,不過比起在溫布 : 頓第四輪那場失誤大戰,這場準決賽他抗壓性算是不錯了,只是那關鍵 : 點的情緒管理還要點火侯而已!期待Nalbandian下次的捲土重來。這次 : 打的真不錯,有93年Pioline表現那種味道。 : 而Roddick還是撐到決賽了!這場比賽是他又一重大考驗,但他沒 : 讓打悶的比賽跟情緒惡化下去,至少沒讓溫布頓那場準決賽事件重演, : 第三盤能一步一步來,先求穩再求勝做得很不錯,那兩個破發點保住更 : 是重要,才有了搶七的機會。不放棄的精神才是大滿貫冠軍該有的特質 : ,恭喜Roddick首次晉級決賽。不過這場比賽希望Roddick自己能發現到 : 他球技的潛在問題,再精益求精,不然以後遇到這類回發球的高手他還 : 是會有大麻煩的。 沒錯,希望Roddick還能夠精益求精,因為雖然我是他的球迷,但是他的打法真的 是沒有什麼變化,只要他的發球狀況一不好,就會開始覺得要擔心了, 而且我覺得有的時候他追求的慾望並不強烈,大概是想說等自己的發球局再守下來 好了,不過比賽要贏不是一定要比出個高下嗎?總不能每次都跟別人拼搶七吧! 明天的冠軍戰,雖然我希望Roddick贏,不過我卻不看好他會贏,就像從前有別 的大大說過的,希望Roddick可以打法變得更全面,不要再只靠本錢打球啦! 如果他可以多學習一點別的打法,他的以後的成就絕對不只有這樣子的! -- 下馬飲君酒 問君何所知 君言不得意 歸臥南山陲 但去莫復問 白雲無盡時 ________逍遙遊 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.csie.ntu.edu.tw) ◆ From: 172.129.105.217
establish:那是在第五盤的爭議球才是OUT… 推 61.62.36.180 09/07
esnique:第三盤搶七那球重播明明壓線… 推 61.230.99.135 09/08
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------- < 作者: youtwo (youtwo) 看板: Tennis 標題: Re: 第二場準決賽觀感 時間: Mon Sep 8 00:31:12 2003 ※ 引述《yourself (你,在做什麼呢?)》之銘言: : ※ 引述《krajicek (終於等到CoCo的新歌了)》之銘言: : 這點我倒是不太能夠認同,關於Roddick為什麼沒有像以前一樣喜歡帶動觀眾氣氛, : 是因為前幾天所發生的那一件事哪!因為對手說不喜歡他撩撥球迷的情緒, : 所以Roddick在這場情緒上的表現就含蓄許多了,像是他在贏得第五盤的勝利時, : 也沒有像前幾場比賽一樣將心中的喜悅特別表現出來,不過Roddick在前兩盤 : 打的不好是事實,只是在面臨對手的賽末點時,又被場上白目的球迷給害慘了, : 其實後來那個爭議球有重播很多次,其實本來就是out,我覺得Roddick贏得乾淨 : ,而且他也真的是一個很努力的球員,不過經過這一役,可能這件事又會被人拿 : 來大作文章了,剛剛看espn,若我沒聽錯的話,新聞是說小班也在賽後發了點牢 : 騷,而內容就是說,這場準決賽只要是very close point,結果都是判給Roddick : 得利,唉!我可憐的小Roddick,這下子你連跳到黃河都洗不清了... 下面附上官網裡Nalbandian的訪談 感覺David很有風度 連續很肯定的表示輸球是在於自己的發球與反拍 這也算是個經驗吧...希望小班以後再多加油囉 大有可為呢 :) Q. Are you very angry now because of the calls? DAVID NALBANDIAN: A little bit. Q. Especially the one 6-all in the tiebreak. Can you comment on that. DAVID NALBANDIAN: Is difficult. You had to fight against everything, but... The match is over and that's it. Q. The tiebreak, was that the reason that you maybe lost the fourth set 6-1? DAVID NALBANDIAN: No. Q. No? DAVID NALBANDIAN: (Shaking his head no). Q. You played to a fabulous level, a wonderful level in the first two sets. How hard is it to keep on playing that way against someone like him? DAVID NALBANDIAN: Is difficult to play without serve and without backhand. Also, is difficult play three games in a row. It's also difficult play against Andy. He's a great player. So, many things. But I don't know. Q. When you've had experience of Davis Cup crowds, is this similar, do you think? If you were playing an American here, it's like playing in a Davis Cup atmosphere as well as Grand Slam atmosphere? DAVID NALBANDIAN: Yeah, sometimes the crowd, you hear so much. But it's some important points maybe somebody call out or something, and it's difficult. Q. Have you heard anything back on that shot, if you thought it was good? Replays are tough to tell. DAVID NALBANDIAN: The replay was good or was out? Q. It was kind of very tough to tell. Very close. DAVID NALBANDIAN: Every time when it's close, everything is for them. Q. Are you happy with the general performance, coming to the semifinals? DAVID NALBANDIAN: Yeah, I feel pretty good. Q. Don't you think you maybe lost the match not in the tiebreak, but you had some chances in the third set earlier? DAVID NALBANDIAN: Yeah, I have many breakpoints. But I think I didn't play bad that point, so he serve really good. Not much to do. Q. What annoyed you the most - the bad call, when they shouted "out" and you almost were stopped by that shout, or other situations in the match? What has annoyed you most? DAVID NALBANDIAN: No, I think the most important on the match, it was when I couldn't serve and I couldn't play my backhand normally. So I think that was the more important things in my game, rather than the tiebreak. Then you have one strange point when they call out, somebody call "out," and that's strange. But the difficult was me, my serve, and my backhand. Q. Why couldn't you serve and play your backhand? What was the reasons? DAVID NALBANDIAN: I get a little injured. Q. What kind of injury? DAVID NALBANDIAN: Abdominal and wrist. (This is a partial transcript) -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.csie.ntu.edu.tw) ◆ From: 140.112.216.120