精華區beta UTAH-JAZZ 關於我們 聯絡資訊
警告:本文過長,請先準備好點心飲料再往下看 Hollinger's Team Forecast: Utah Jazz By John Hollinger ESPN.com http://tinyurl.com/47rfhj 原文及其他各隊分析 2007-08 Recap Call it a case of foul play. Utah had the best point differential in the Western Conference last season and was lights-out in the second half of the season. Heading into the second round of the playoffs, they seemed to have a great shot at upsetting the top-seeded Lakers and making a run to the Finals. They might have pulled it off, too, if not for a pesky rule that permits a player to shoot free throws if the other team fouls him. In six games, L.A.'s Kobe Bryant took an unfathomable 96 free-throw attempts; he made 80 of them. That, in a nutshell, was the series. Utah scored more than enough points to win and did reasonably well in other respects on defense, but the Lakers' parade to the free-throw line killed any hope of an upset. The free-throw frenzy wasn't isolated to those six games. Bryant didn't get 96 free throws because of some conspiracy to favor the Lakers or a nefarious plot by David Stern to keep small-market teams out of the Finals; it happened because Utah really, truly fouled him on nearly every play, just like they did to most of their opponents all season. ┌────────────────┬─┐ │ HOLLINGER'S '07-08 STATS │X│ (註:Pythagorean畢氏定理 ├────────────────┴─┤ 流行於棒球界的一種藉由得失分來 │W-L: 54-28 (Pythagorean W-L: 62-20) │ 推測勝率的公式,因為式子很像畢 │Offensive Efficiency: 110.8 (2nd) │ 氏定理故命名之。這裡用的是對NBA │Defensive Efficiency: 104.0 (12th) │ 用的修正版) │Pace Factor: 95.6 (11th) │ │Highest PER: Carlos Boozer (21.96) │ 2007-08 推測勝率: └──────────────────┘ http://tinyurl.com/3kjekk That tendency has become a hugely important story, because in 2007-08 the Jazz were a championship-caliber team in virtually every other respect. The rampant fouling was really the only thing standing between them and a conference title at the very least. ┌───────────────────┐ │Opponent FTA Per FGA: 2007-08's Worst │ ├───────────────────┤ │TEAM OPP. FTA/FGA │ │Utah .393 ←┐ │ │Indiana .358 ←┘哇! │ │New Jersey .353 │ │Minnesota .350 │ │Boston .341 │ │League average .306 │ └───────────────────┘ And I do mean RAMPANT fouling. Jerry Sloan's teams have posted ridiculously high foul numbers for most of the past two decades, and last season the Jazz redoubled their efforts. Utah led the NBA in both personal fouls and opponent free throw attempts, and did so by a staggering margin. Jazz opponents took .393 free-throw attempts per field-goal attempt last season (see chart); not only was that terrible, but they're actually getting worse: Relative to the league it was a .05 increase from their league-worst mark of a year earlier. And it was hugely costly. Utah gave up 410 more points on free throws than it would have by fouling at the league average rate, or exactly five points a game -- an amount large enough to swing about 13 games in a typical NBA season. Granted, opponents would have taken shots from the field on most of those possessions and probably hit a solid percentage (fouls tend to come when the defense is at a disadvantage); but even if they'd made 55 percent of them Utah would have saved itself two points a game. Those two points a game are worth between five and six wins for a typical NBA team, which for the Jazz last season was the difference between being the top seed in the West and having to play on the road every round. More generally, the major hole they dig themselves into with the fouls makes it virtually impossible for the Jazz to have a championship-caliber defense; the only reason they were even in the hunt last season was because they led the league in offensive efficiency over the second half of the season. That's been the case for Utah ever since Sloan adopted the foul-on-every-play strategy near the end of the Stockton-Malone era (their Finals teams fouled at much less prodigious rates) -- the defense has been average at best every season, because you can't be at the top of the league giving away this many free points. It's amazing that the personnel cost wasn't greater, too. Utah had a unique approach to avoid foul trouble to its best players -- the starters would play normal defense, and the bench guys would come in and just hammer people. While each of the starting five had reasonable foul rates, four Jazz reserves (Paul Millsap, Ronnie Price, C.J. Miles and Jason Hart) had among the highest foul rates at their positions, while Matt Harpring and Kyle Korver weren't far behind. Korver, actually, is a great example of how this is clearly a tactical decision for the Jazz. He averaged 3.0 and 3.1 fouls per 36 minutes the two previous seasons as a member of the Sixers; in Utah that ballooned to 4.2. The fouling at least had one positive: often the Jazz wrested the ball away and the zebras let the contact go. Utah had the league's third-best opponent turnover rate, forcing miscues on 16.7 percent of opponent possessions. Combined with a strong performance on the defensive boards, the Jazz were the toughest team in the league to get a shot off against (see chart). Utah opponents fired only 94.1 shots per 100 possessions, which was the main reason the Jazz were able to finish 12th in defensive efficiency instead of, say, 30th. ┌─────────────────────┐ │Fewest Opp. Shots Per Possessions, 2007-08│ ├─────────────────────┤ │TEAM OPP. SHOTS* PER POSS. │ │Utah 94.1 │ │Boston 94.7 │ │Philadelphia 95.2 │ │Indiana 95.5 │ │Chicago 95.7 │ │League average 96.7 │ ├─────────────────────┤ │ * Shots = FGA + (FTA * 0.44) │ └─────────────────────┘ Speaking of Korver, it was Utah's midseason acquisition of him that helped turned their season around after a slow start. The Jazz started the year just 18-17, with Mehmet Okur in particular playing horribly, before snapping out of their early funk and rolling to the division title. That was around the same time Korver arrived -- after trading Gordan Giricek and a first-round pick to Philadelphia to get him, they went 38-16. His impact was more the threat of his shot than the reality of it -- he only made 38.8 percent of his 3s for the Jazz. But on a team devoid of his shooting, his presence loosened up packed-in defenses -- especially when Okur was off the floor -- and allowed the other guys to do their thing. As I mentioned, Utah ranked first in offensive efficiency for the second half of the season, and second for the year as a whole. They were second in the NBA in field-goal percentage, 2-point shooting percentage, true shooting percentage, and free-throw attempts per field-goal attempt (Jerry's teams get it as good as they give it when it comes to fouling). And although they still rarely took 3-pointers -- they had the fourth-lowest rate of 3-point shots -- Korver led them to a solid 37.2 percent. Like I said, it was a championship-caliber offense. And hopefully they'll stop hacking long enough to prove it. Biggest Strength: Interior scoring This team is a layup machine, plain and simple. Williams is among the best point guards in basketball and always delivers it to the right spot, and starters Boozer, Kirilenko and Brewer are all outstanding finishers around the basket. Additionally, Utah's offensive system is an unorthodox one by NBA standards, relying heavily on off-ball screening and cutting to get players open near the rim for short-range shots. It produces lots of layups and free throws, especially for players like Brewer and Harpring who excel at moving without the ball -- Williams will always find them, and Kirilenko is a good passer too. Off the bench, the Jazz don't lose a lot in this regard. I mentioned Harpring above, but Millsap is also very effective around the basket, and Price, the backup at point guard, is a good finisher when he gets to the rim. With layups coming in waves, the Jazz don't need a whole lot of shooting to be among the league's elite offenses. Biggest Weakness: Interior defense A big reason the Jazz sent opponents to the line so often was because the backline bailed them out so rarely. The combo of Okur and Boozer up front is brilliant offensively, but at the defensive end their weaknesses are more easily exposed. Okur is indifferent at best as a help defender and can't get off the floor to block shots at the rim, while Boozer's explosive leaping at the offensive end doesn't seem to translate into quality defense. Off the bench it doesn't get too much better. Millsap is incredibly active but incredibly foul-prone, while Jarron Collins is a spent force whose offensive limitations prevent him from playing much. Harpring, when used at power forward, is of limited utility as a help defender and worthless as a shot-blocker. For those reasons, some wonder if the Jazz would be better served by trading one of their bigs for a wing player and moving Kirilenko to power forward. He was one of the league's leading shot-blockers from that position until two years ago, and might be a highly effective help-side flyswatter if returned to that role. With both frontcourt starters potentially entering free agency after the season, it's food for thought. Outlook OK, they foul on every play. The good news is that if they just cut the foul rate a little bit, they can be good enough defensively to allow the offense to win games for them. And we have reason to suspect they can pull that feat off. Between Brewer's emergence as a stopper on the wings, a likely reduction in playing time for high-foul players like Harpring and Collins, and, more hopefully, some recognition by Sloan that this state of affairs must change, it seems plausible for the Jazz to improve here. If so, it's hard to argue with them in the West, because they've got everything else. The Jazz have go-to stars in both the backcourt and the frontcourt, have multiple scoring weapons surrounding them, and have arguably the deepest team in the conference. That last point is important, because this team is tailor-made for the regular-season grind --it can easily survive minor injuries and slumps and has no player who is too indispensable. Additionally, they're still on the upswing. Williams is 24, Boozer is 26, and every key player except Harpring is in his 20s. Okur and Korver are both likely to have better years than a season ago, but nobody except perhaps Harpring projects to sharply regress. Add it all up and the Jazz, perhaps a bit surprisingly, came out with the top record in the West when I projected each team's outcome -- beating out the Lakers by a single game. L.A. has the higher ceiling, and arguably so does Houston, but the Jazz have a far better likelihood of getting close to their roof. Taking things a step further, picking the Jazz to have home-court advantage by virtue of the best record in the West means one almost has to pick them to win the conference, too -- between the altitude and the crowd's impact on the zebras, this team is nigh unbeatable at home. It's a crowded race and they're one of three teams I see as having roughly equal odds of making it out, but if I have to pick a horse out West, this is the one. Prediction: 58-24, 1st in Northwest Division, 1st in Western Conference -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 61.62.78.100
hardaway:Prediction: 1st in Western Conference 10/02 17:18
CarlosBoozer:11311 10/02 17:35
moamo:阿爵有權利要求翻譯(反正剛登出小不點你就翻一下大意嘛:P) 10/02 18:17
PVD:$oozer:給錢就翻~ 10/02 18:41
amonway:快推...不然人家以為我們英文不好.. 10/02 21:19
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------- < 作者: CarlosBoozer (給我大懶熊) 看板: UTAH-JAZZ 標題: Re: Hollinger's Team Forecast: Utah Jazz 時間: Thu Oct 2 21:55:31 2008 ※ 引述《CarlosBoozer (給我大懶熊)》之銘言: 長話短說版 : http://tinyurl.com/47rfhj 原文及其他各隊分析 : 2007-08 Recap : Call it a case of foul play. : Utah had the best point differential in the Western Conference last : season and was lights-out in the second half of the season. Heading : into the second round of the playoffs, they seemed to have a great : shot at upsetting the top-seeded Lakers and making a run to the : Finals. 爵士去年有最佳的勝分差,加上下半季吃錯藥的爆衝 看起來很有機會作翻湖人 : They might have pulled it off, too, if not for a pesky rule that : permits a player to shoot free throws if the other team fouls him. In : six games, L.A.'s Kobe Bryant took an unfathomable 96 free-throw : attempts; he made 80 of them. That, in a nutshell, was the series. : Utah scored more than enough points to win and did reasonably well in : other respects on defense, but the Lakers' parade to the free-throw : line killed any hope of an upset. 夢醒來只看到 某個人 這一系列罰了96球:他罰進80個。 即使說爵士拿了夠多分、防守也還可以。 : The free-throw frenzy wasn't isolated to those six games. Bryant : didn't get 96 free throws because of some conspiracy to favor the : Lakers or a nefarious plot by David Stern to keep small-market teams : out of the Finals; it happened because Utah really, truly fouled him : on nearly every play, just like they did to most of their opponents : all season. 代誌不是這六場才發生的啦!因為爵士幾乎每波都真的犯規。 而且不管對手是誰,一整季都是這樣。 : ┌────────────────┬─┐ : │ HOLLINGER'S '07-08 STATS │X│ (註:Pythagorean畢氏定理 : ├────────────────┴─┤ 流行於棒球界的一種藉由得失分來 : │W-L: 54-28 (Pythagorean W-L: 62-20) │ 推測勝率的公式,因為式子很像畢 : │Offensive Efficiency: 110.8 (2nd) │ 氏定理故命名之。這裡用的是對NBA : │Defensive Efficiency: 104.0 (12th) │ 用的修正版) : │Pace Factor: 95.6 (11th) │ : │Highest PER: Carlos Boozer (21.96) │ 2007-08 推測勝率: : └──────────────────┘ http://tinyurl.com/3kjekk : That tendency has become a hugely important story, because in 2007-08 : the Jazz were a championship-caliber team in virtually every other : respect. The rampant fouling was really the only thing standing : between them and a conference title at the very least. 從其他方面的表現來看,爵士是個奪冠勁旅,但罄竹難書的犯規成了鐵板。 : ┌───────────────────┐ : │Opponent FTA Per FGA: 2007-08's Worst │ : ├───────────────────┤ : │TEAM OPP. FTA/FGA │ : │Utah .393 ←┐ │ : │Indiana .358 ←┘哇! │ : │New Jersey .353 │ : │Minnesota .350 │ : │Boston .341 │ : │League average .306 │ : └───────────────────┘ 上圖為對手的 罰球數/出手數 比例 : And I do mean RAMPANT fouling. Jerry Sloan's teams have posted : ridiculously high foul numbers for most of the past two decades, and : last season the Jazz redoubled their efforts. Utah led the NBA in : both personal fouls and opponent free throw attempts, and did so by a : staggering margin. Jazz opponents took .393 free-throw attempts per : field-goal attempt last season (see chart); not only was that : terrible, but they're actually getting worse: Relative to the league : it was a .05 increase from their league-worst mark of a year earlier. 下屬倫囉!爵士對手的罰球/出手比例高達.393!而且還在升高… 比去年他們的聯盟最差紀錄又多了.05! : And it was hugely costly. Utah gave up 410 more points on free throws : than it would have by fouling at the league average rate, or exactly : five points a game -- an amount large enough to swing about 13 games : in a typical NBA season. Granted, opponents would have taken shots : from the field on most of those possessions and probably hit a solid : percentage (fouls tend to come when the defense is at a : disadvantage); but even if they'd made 55 percent of them Utah would : have saved itself two points a game. 換算起來,他們比聯盟平均多損失了410分。 雖然說犯規多半發生在防守不利時,但即使這些犯規換成55%的出手命中 他們每場平均還是損失了兩分! : Those two points a game are worth between five and six wins for a : typical NBA team, which for the Jazz last season was the difference : between being the top seed in the West and having to play on the road : every round. 一般來說,每場多兩分相當於多了五至六場勝利, 對爵士來說已經是第一種子和每輪宅不過別人的差別。 : More generally, the major hole they dig themselves into with the : fouls makes it virtually impossible for the Jazz to have a : championship-caliber defense; the only reason they were even in the : hunt last season was because they led the league in offensive : efficiency over the second half of the season. That's been the case : for Utah ever since Sloan adopted the foul-on-every-play strategy : near the end of the Stockton-Malone era (their Finals teams fouled at : much less prodigious rates) -- the defense has been average at best : every season, because you can't be at the top of the league giving : away this many free points. 他們去年的競爭力來自於下半季聯盟最高的進攻效率。 後馬龍時代,史龍的「來一波犯一波」策略, 讓他們的防守頂多是一般水準(爭冠那兩年犯規比例低很多), 沒道理送了那麼多分還能拿第一的啦。 (1997-98 .357 , 1996-97 .387 ,棍!哈林爵你騙我!) : It's amazing that the personnel cost wasn't greater, too. Utah had a : unique approach to avoid foul trouble to its best players -- the : starters would play normal defense, and the bench guys would come in : and just hammer people. While each of the starting five had : reasonable foul rates, four Jazz reserves (Paul Millsap, Ronnie : Price, C.J. Miles and Jason Hart) had among the highest foul rates at : their positions, while Matt Harpring and Kyle Korver weren't far : behind. 但是這竟不影響他們人員輪替,因為他們最好的球員都避免犯規。 他們先發看似一般,但替補上來就換了個球類運動。 米爺、真王牌、西街、東京熱都是犯規好手,小哈和帥哥也差不到哪兒去。 (換算成36分鐘的平均犯規:米爺5.7、真王牌5.1、西街5.1、東京熱4.5 小哈4.2、帥哥4.2、科科5.4、費神科也有9.8! 很好混的先發五人大約在1.9到3.7之間,而且正好是最少犯的前五名!) : Korver, actually, is a great example of how this is clearly a : tactical decision for the Jazz. He averaged 3.0 and 3.1 fouls per 36 : minutes the two previous seasons as a member of the Sixers; in Utah : that ballooned to 4.2. 看帥哥換算成36分鐘的平均犯規:從板主脫團隊的3出頭,到現在爵士隊的4.2 : The fouling at least had one positive: often the Jazz wrested the : ball away and the zebras let the contact go. Utah had the league's : third-best opponent turnover rate, forcing miscues on 16.7 percent of : opponent possessions. Combined with a strong performance on the : defensive boards, the Jazz were the toughest team in the league to : get a shot off against (see chart). Utah opponents fired only 94.1 : shots per 100 possessions, which was the main reason the Jazz were : able to finish 12th in defensive efficiency instead of, say, 30th. 不過他們至少從中得到某個好處:製造對手失誤效率第3。 對手每100次進攻有16.7次失誤。 同時對手每100次進攻只有94.1次Shots也是聯盟最低。 Shots = FGA + (FTA * 0.44) 見下圖 再加上他們兇猛的防守籃板, 使得他們防守效率還能排在12名,而不是,呃,最後。 : ┌─────────────────────┐ : │Fewest Opp. Shots Per Possessions, 2007-08│ : ├─────────────────────┤ : │TEAM OPP. SHOTS* PER POSS. │ : │Utah 94.1 │ : │Boston 94.7 │ : │Philadelphia 95.2 │ : │Indiana 95.5 │ : │Chicago 95.7 │ : │League average 96.7 │ : ├─────────────────────┤ : │ * Shots = FGA + (FTA * 0.44) │ : └─────────────────────┘ : Speaking of Korver, it was Utah's midseason acquisition of him that : helped turned their season around after a slow start. The Jazz : started the year just 18-17, with Mehmet Okur in particular playing : horribly, before snapping out of their early funk and rolling to the : division title. That was around the same time Korver arrived -- after : trading Gordan Giricek and a first-round pick to Philadelphia to get : him, they went 38-16. 帥哥下凡和奧酷再臨,讓他們在18-17後,獲得38-16的佳績。 : His impact was more the threat of his shot than the reality of it -- : he only made 38.8 percent of his 3s for the Jazz. But on a team : devoid of his shooting, his presence loosened up packed-in defenses : -- especially when Okur was off the floor -- and allowed the other : guys to do their thing. 他的威脅不只是38.8%的三分命中率, 而是弄鬆了對手臣又的內縮防守──在奧酷下場時尤為嚴重。 讓其他人得以發揮。 : As I mentioned, Utah ranked first in offensive efficiency for the : second half of the season, and second for the year as a whole. They : were second in the NBA in field-goal percentage, 2-point shooting : percentage, true shooting percentage, and free-throw attempts per : field-goal attempt (Jerry's teams get it as good as they give it when : it comes to fouling). And although they still rarely took 3-pointers : -- they had the fourth-lowest rate of 3-point shots -- Korver led : them to a solid 37.2 percent. 老調重彈 爵士進攻效率下半季第一、全年第二。 出手命中率、兩分命中率、true shooting命中率、犯規/出手 比例都是第二名。 (跟他們的犯規一樣優秀) 聯盟第四低的三分出手比例 : Like I said, it was a championship-caliber offense. And hopefully : they'll stop hacking long enough to prove it. 他們有冠軍水準的進攻,也希望他們能停止犯規來證明這一切。 : Biggest Strength: Interior scoring 最大優勢:內線得分 : This team is a layup machine, plain and simple. Williams is among the : best point guards in basketball and always delivers it to the right : spot, and starters Boozer, Kirilenko and Brewer are all outstanding : finishers around the basket. 小胖到位的傳球,娘布、嫩姬、釀酒人都是籃框附近的得分好手。 : Additionally, Utah's offensive system is an unorthodox one by NBA : standards, relying heavily on off-ball screening and cutting to get : players open near the rim for short-range shots. It produces lots of : layups and free throws, especially for players like Brewer and : Harpring who excel at moving without the ball -- Williams will always : find them, and Kirilenko is a good passer too. 爵士異於常人的進攻系統,強調無球掩護、穿梭, 來取得靠近籃框的得分機會。 釀酒人和小哈擅於無球跑動, 小胖傳好球、嫩姬險中球。 : Off the bench, the Jazz don't lose a lot in this regard. I mentioned : Harpring above, but Millsap is also very effective around the basket, : and Price, the backup at point guard, is a good finisher when he gets : to the rim. With layups coming in waves, the Jazz don't need a whole : lot of shooting to be among the league's elite offenses. 板凳還有一些同樣的好手如謎爺和真王牌。 葉啟田贊曰「上籃親像是海上的波浪」,一波未平一波又起。 高潮時連投籃都免了。 : Biggest Weakness: Interior defense 內線防守是最大的隱憂 : A big reason the Jazz sent opponents to the line so often was because : the backline bailed them out so rarely. The combo of Okur and Boozer : up front is brilliant offensively, but at the defensive end their : weaknesses are more easily exposed. Okur is indifferent at best as a : help defender and can't get off the floor to block shots at the rim, : while Boozer's explosive leaping at the offensive end doesn't seem to : translate into quality defense. 爵士對手能一再上罰球線,在於他們後方的防波堤形同虛設。 娘布和奧酷的防守弱點一展無遺。 奧酷補防蓋鍋時腳離不開地板。 娘布也只會在進攻時使勁跳。 : Off the bench it doesn't get too much better. Millsap is incredibly : active but incredibly foul-prone, while Jarron Collins is a spent : force whose offensive limitations prevent him from playing much. : Harpring, when used at power forward, is of limited utility as a help : defender and worthless as a shot-blocker. 板凳也不怎麼樣。 米爺防守主動犯規連連、 科科礙於進攻上不了場、 小哈能力有限鍋子不足。 : For those reasons, some wonder if the Jazz would be better served by : trading one of their bigs for a wing player and moving Kirilenko to : power forward. He was one of the league's leading shot-blockers from : that position until two years ago, and might be a highly effective : help-side flyswatter if returned to that role. With both frontcourt : starters potentially entering free agency after the season, it's food : for thought. 爵士可能更好:把他們一個大隻佬拿去換一個側翼球員, 然後把嫩姬放在大前鋒──他可能變成以前那個大掃把嫩姬 因為內線那兩隻,本季可能成為自由球員。 : Outlook 展望 : OK, they foul on every play. The good news is that if they just cut : the foul rate a little bit, they can be good enough defensively to : allow the offense to win games for them. And we have reason to : suspect they can pull that feat off. Between Brewer's emergence as a : stopper on the wings, a likely reduction in playing time for : high-foul players like Harpring and Collins, and, more hopefully, : some recognition by Sloan that this state of affairs must change, it : seems plausible for the Jazz to improve here. 好消息是:他們只要少犯點規就能多贏些球, 釀酒人若成為側翼的大鎖,可能就減少像小哈和科科這些犯規大王的上場時間 當然,希望教皇史隆能意識到這點。 : If so, it's hard to argue with them in the West, because they've got : everything else. The Jazz have go-to stars in both the backcourt and : the frontcourt, have multiple scoring weapons surrounding them, and : have arguably the deepest team in the conference. That last point is : important, because this team is tailor-made for the regular-season : grind --it can easily survive minor injuries and slumps and has no : player who is too indispensable. 如果能的話,他們在西區的地位無須懷疑,因為他們萬事具備。 他們前場後場都有執球耳的明星、也不乏火力。 重要的是他們人員深度夠,可以說是為常規賽打造──什麼都有什麼都賣 不用擔心傷兵、也不用擔心有誰忽然人間蒸發 因為 沒有人真的不能少 : Additionally, they're still on the upswing. Williams is 24, Boozer is : 26, and every key player except Harpring is in his 20s. Okur and : Korver are both likely to have better years than a season ago, but : nobody except perhaps Harpring projects to sharply regress. 年輕的肉體還有開發的空間。 除了小哈外,重要球員都還在2X 奧酷和帥哥將來都很有可能比去年更進步, 但是最後一句我看不懂。 : Add it all up and the Jazz, perhaps a bit surprisingly, came out with : the top record in the West when I projected each team's outcome -- : beating out the Lakers by a single game. L.A. has the higher ceiling, : and arguably so does Houston, but the Jazz have a far better : likelihood of getting close to their roof. 這一切看起來是這麼的美好,驚人的是, 在我推算之下爵士以一場差擊敗湖人拿下西區龍頭, 也許湖人和火箭的天花板比較高,但是爵士更有可能到達他們頂樓。 : Taking things a step further, picking the Jazz to have home-court : advantage by virtue of the best record in the West means one almost : has to pick them to win the conference, too -- between the altitude : and the crowd's impact on the zebras, this team is nigh unbeatable at : home. It's a crowded race and they're one of three teams I see as : having roughly equal odds of making it out, but if I have to pick a : horse out West, this is the one. 再說一個好消息:以阿爵的宅力,若能拿下主場優勢, 幾乎等同於拿下分區。 再加上高海拔的地利、觀眾對裁判的影響,宅力近乎無敵。 在我看來,這三隊難分難解,要我來選就這隻了。 : Prediction: 58-24, 1st in Northwest Division, 1st in Western : Conference 預測58-24,西區第一 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 61.62.78.100
monmo:Truth命中率是指什麼? 費神科的犯規效率真是太銷魂了..... 10/02 22:20
hardaway:True shooting % = PTS / (2 * (FGA + 0.44 * FTA)) 10/02 22:26
hardaway:意指一個球員進攻一次(包括出手和得到罰球機會)的得分率 10/02 22:28
hardaway:其實想請 Actus 大翻譯詳細版,記得去年他翻得超好的 XD 10/02 22:41
hardaway:哈哈,發現去年那篇摸摸就有在問 true shooting 是啥了 10/02 22:42
hardaway:結果隔了一年,又問一次 XD 10/02 22:43
CarlosBoozer:爵士無三阿,布瑟當前鋒 10/02 22:49
hardaway:你翻的也很有趣啦。 下屬倫囉! 那句笑屬我了 XD 10/02 22:53
Kreen:~ 10/02 23:26
BlGP:結論我們防守太軟所以只能靠犯規 所以才會輸 10/02 23:35
CarlosBoozer:至於那個畢氏定理在棒球界蠻準的,所以還蠻有名 10/02 23:52
CarlosBoozer:不過用在NBA似乎沒那麼準啊 10/02 23:53
CarlosBoozer:請教授指導 @@? 10/02 23:53
DK47: 看到外電翻譯 就有淡淡的哀傷......我要大尾~~>"< 10/03 00:12
MOTONARI:有翻有推 好文我頂 10/03 00:25
fragkai:預測58-24,西區第一 (是爵士迷就該這樣翻!!) 10/03 00:37
Poleaxe:葉啟田贊曰「上籃親像是海上的波浪」 XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD 10/03 00:48
Stockton:推小布點,您又回來啦^o^ 本尊為什麼不出現呢? 10/03 01:20
Actus:一人翻一年,今年輪到摸摸 10/03 01:23
monmo:那誰跟我輪開季展望還有籃球邦爵士稿...=.= 10/03 01:44
Actus:還有小王子文,通通樓上硬食 10/03 01:46
gratitude:moamo可以和摸摸輪流 10/03 06:57
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------- < 作者: larson (哉哉) 看板: NBA 標題: [情報] Hollinger's Team Forecast 時間: Thu Oct 2 22:34:56 2008 這是ESPN.com的球評John Hollinger對各隊所做的季前分析 (兩天內寫完這30支球隊!真快!) 但因為太過繁雜,就只列出戰績預測,並附上連結 詳細的內容就交給各球隊板的強者去翻譯吧~ 另外,如果你覺得想跟他說什麼話,表達你的看法,可以到這裡寫: http://proxy.espn.go.com/chat/mailbagESPN?event_id=7936 東區 Boston Celtics Prediction: 60-22, 1st in Atlantic Division, 1st in Eastern Conference http://0rz.tw/ca4Rn Detroit Pistons Prediction: 54-28, 1st in Central Division, 2nd in Eastern Conference http://0rz.tw/014Pj Philadelphia 76ers Prediction: 50-32, 2nd in Atlantic Division, 3rd in Eastern Conference http://0rz.tw/9e4TC Orlando Magic Prediction: 46-36, 1st in Southeast Division, 4th in Eastern Conference http://0rz.tw/074Qr Cleveland Cavaliers Prediction: 47-35, 2nd in Central Division, T-5th in Eastern Conference http://0rz.tw/fd4O9 Toronto Raptors Prediction: 47-35, 3rd in Atlantic Division, T-5th in Eastern Conference http://0rz.tw/ad4QQ Indiana Pacers Prediction: 41-41, 3rd in Central Division, 7th in Eastern Conference http://0rz.tw/fc4PH Charlotte Bobcats Prediction: 40-42, 2nd in Southeast Division, 8th in Eastern Conference http://0rz.tw/4a4Qg Miami Heat Prediction: 39-43, 3rd in Southeast Division, T-9th in Eastern Conference http://0rz.tw/d74P9 Chicago Bulls Prediction: 39-43, 4th in Central Division, T-9th in Eastern Conference http://0rz.tw/af4Ok Washington Wizards Prediction: 36-46, 4th in Southeast Division, 11th in Eastern Conference http://0rz.tw/cb4Ry Milwaukee Bucks Prediction: 32-50, 5th in Central Division, 12th in Eastern Conference http://0rz.tw/1e4Pj Atlanta Hawks Prediction: 31-51, fifth in Southeast Division, 13th in Eastern Conference http://0rz.tw/594OP New York Knicks Prediction: 28-54, 4th in Atlantic Division, 14th in Eastern Conference http://0rz.tw/4d4RW New Jersey Nets Prediction: 27-55, 5th in Atlantic Division, 15th in Eastern Conference http://0rz.tw/764Qq 西區 Utah Jazz Prediction: 58-24, 1st in Northwest Division, 1st in Western Conference http://0rz.tw/784Ts Los Angeles Lakers Prediction: 57-25, 1st in Pacific Division, 2nd in Western Conference http://0rz.tw/9a4TF Houston Rockets Prediction: 56-26, 1st in Southwest Division, 3rd in Western Conference http://0rz.tw/524S3 New Orleans Hornets Prediction: 50-32, 2nd in Southwest Division, 4th in Western Conference http://0rz.tw/174TI San Antonio Spurs Prediction: 47-35, 3rd in Southwest Division, 5th in Western Conference http://0rz.tw/8e4TF Dallas Mavericks Prediction: 45-37, 4th in Southwest Division, T-6th in Western Conference http://0rz.tw/2d4Se Phoenix Suns Prediction: 45-37, 2nd in Pacific Division, T-6th in Western Conference http://0rz.tw/934QL Portland Trail Blazers Prediction: 42-40, 2nd in Northwest Division, 8th in Western Conference http://0rz.tw/854N9 Denver Nuggets Prediction: 41-41, 3rd in Northwest Division, 9th in Western Conference http://0rz.tw/fa4T2 Golden State Warriors Prediction: 40-42, 3rd in Pacific Division, 10th in Western Conference http://0rz.tw/a24Sy Minnesota Timberwolves Prediction: 31-51, 4th in Northwest Division, 11th in Western Conference http://0rz.tw/f24Qd Los Angeles Clippers Prediction: 30-52, 4th in Pacific Division, 12th in Western Conference http://0rz.tw/5c4Tj Memphis Grizzlies Prediction: 26-56, 5th in Southwest Division, 13th in Western Conference http://0rz.tw/394Qy Sacramento Kings Prediction: 23-59, 5th in Pacific Division, 14th in Western Conference http://0rz.tw/724UT Oklahoma City Thunder Prediction: 20-62, 5th in Northwest Division, 15th in Western Conference http://0rz.tw/764Qt -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 140.113.91.31
larson:整理完才發現貴板已經有翻譯了...真快! 10/02 22:39
popstarkirby:0.0.... 10/02 22:42
popstarkirby:我沒注意到@@.. 10/02 22:43
larson:其實我也知道大概每隊都有人會去翻啦,就先整理全聯盟的順序 10/02 22:45
CarlosBoozer:整理這麼快也不容易了 XD 10/02 22:46
pinkidd:叫我們貴板感覺很怪,叫瘋子板比較貼切 10/02 23:24
MOTONARI:把JAZZ評為西區第一 我不禁為他的勇氣喝采 10/03 00:38
CarlosBoozer:去年都預測總冠軍了! 10/03 00:46
CarlosBoozer:不過是資料計算的結果,不是他評的.. 10/03 00:49
MOTONARI:資料算不出來客場一條虫啊 10/03 01:16
willyt:但是他對資料的見解算是全美第一了 10/03 03:24
willyt:我覺得他講的還蠻有八分中肯,數據可以看到一些不同的面相 10/03 03:24
AK3pt:資料算不出娘的程度 10/03 03:35
gratitude:ESPN是不是有機密資料沒有移交給NBALIVE總部? 10/03 07:05
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------- < 作者: jeromeshih (以謹慎態度來面對問題) 看板: UTAH-JAZZ 標題: Re: Hollinger's Team Forecast: Utah Jazz 時間: Sat Oct 4 23:44:38 2008 ※ 引述《CarlosBoozer (給我大懶熊)》之銘言: : 警告:本文過長,請先準備好點心飲料再往下看 : Hollinger's Team Forecast: Utah Jazz : By John Hollinger : ESPN.com : http://tinyurl.com/47rfhj 原文及其他各隊分析 : 2007-08 Recap : Call it a case of foul play. : Utah had the best point differential in the Western Conference last : season and was lights-out in the second half of the season. Heading : into the second round of the playoffs, they seemed to have a great : shot at upsetting the top-seeded Lakers and making a run to the : Finals. 爵士在去年西區季後賽擁有較為輕鬆的對戰組合,而且在後半季的戰績也非常搶眼. 在挺進第二輪後,爵士也被認為有機會讓頭號種子的湖人翻船並闖進決賽. : They might have pulled it off, too, if not for a pesky rule that : permits a player to shoot free throws if the other team fouls him. In : six games, L.A.'s Kobe Bryant took an unfathomable 96 free-throw : attempts; he made 80 of them. That, in a nutshell, was the series. : Utah scored more than enough points to win and did reasonably well in : other respects on defense, but the Lakers' parade to the free-throw : line killed any hope of an upset. 爵士原本是有機會如果不是那討厭的規則讓被犯規的球員需站上罰球線.在6場比賽裡 讓對方頭號得分手罰了96球並得到80分.簡單來說,這就是整個系列賽的縮影. 爵士得到比贏球更多的分數而且在防守其他方面的表現也都非常合理,但因為湖人 不斷站上罰球線也化解了翻盤的可能性. : The free-throw frenzy wasn't isolated to those six games. Bryant : didn't get 96 free throws because of some conspiracy to favor the : Lakers or a nefarious plot by David Stern to keep small-market teams : out of the Finals; it happened because Utah really, truly fouled him : on nearly every play, just like they did to most of their opponents : all season. 瘋狂罰球並未獨立於這六場比賽.這位得分手並不應該獲得96次的罰球機會,但因為 某些陰謀或者總裁不可告人想法--讓小市場球隊無法打進季後賽.這種罰球情況 會發生的原因是因為爵士在每次的進攻防守都使他困擾,這些與爵士今年困擾他們對手 的情況如出一轍. : ┌────────────────┬─┐ : │ HOLLINGER'S '07-08 STATS │X│ (註:Pythagorean畢氏定理 : ├────────────────┴─┤ 流行於棒球界的一種藉由得失分來 : │W-L: 54-28 (Pythagorean W-L: 62-20) │ 推測勝率的公式,因為式子很像畢 : │Offensive Efficiency: 110.8 (2nd) │ 氏定理故命名之。這裡用的是對NBA : │Defensive Efficiency: 104.0 (12th) │ 用的修正版) : │Pace Factor: 95.6 (11th) │ : │Highest PER: Carlos Boozer (21.96) │ 2007-08 推測勝率: : └──────────────────┘ http://tinyurl.com/3kjekk : That tendency has become a hugely important story, because in 2007-08 : the Jazz were a championship-caliber team in virtually every other : respect. The rampant fouling was really the only thing standing : between them and a conference title at the very least. 這種趨勢裡也有一些故事,因為在07-08球季,不論從任何一面來看,爵士應該是有實力 競爭總冠軍的勁旅.但無法抑制的犯規是唯一阻止他們得到西區冠軍的原因. : ┌───────────────────┐ : │Opponent FTA Per FGA: 2007-08's Worst │ : ├───────────────────┤ : │TEAM OPP. FTA/FGA │ : │Utah .393 ←┐ │ : │Indiana .358 ←┘哇! │ : │New Jersey .353 │ : │Minnesota .350 │ : │Boston .341 │ : │League average .306 │ : └───────────────────┘ : And I do mean RAMPANT fouling. Jerry Sloan's teams have posted : ridiculously high foul numbers for most of the past two decades, and : last season the Jazz redoubled their efforts. Utah led the NBA in : both personal fouls and opponent free throw attempts, and did so by a : staggering margin. Jazz opponents took .393 free-throw attempts per : field-goal attempt last season (see chart); not only was that : terrible, but they're actually getting worse: Relative to the league : it was a .05 increase from their league-worst mark of a year earlier. 我會說過度犯規的原因是教皇的球隊在過去兩個球季的犯規次數都太驚人了,而且 在上一季爵士的情況又更加嚴重.爵士在個人犯規以及讓對手罰球都以驚人的差距領先 聯盟.上一季,爵士的對手在每次投籃都有0.393的機會能上罰球線;更糟的不僅於此, 爵士還使此情況加重,他們比前一年自己締造的成績又增加了0.05 : And it was hugely costly. Utah gave up 410 more points on free throws : than it would have by fouling at the league average rate, or exactly : five points a game -- an amount large enough to swing about 13 games : in a typical NBA season. Granted, opponents would have taken shots : from the field on most of those possessions and probably hit a solid : percentage (fouls tend to come when the defense is at a : disadvantage); but even if they'd made 55 percent of them Utah would : have saved itself two points a game. 而且這些犯規也帶來昂貴的代價,相對於聯盟平均水準,爵士在罰球線上多丟掉了410分, 或者更精確的說,每場多丟5分.這足以在一個正規NBA球季改變13場比賽的結果. 假定對手都能得到最多的出手次數而且擁有一定的命中率(當防守處於弱勢時,犯規被 預期發生)但即使對手罰球命中率在55%爵士也能在一場比賽省下兩分. : Those two points a game are worth between five and six wins for a : typical NBA team, which for the Jazz last season was the difference : between being the top seed in the West and having to play on the road : every round. 一場兩分的差距對於一支球隊足以多出5到6場的勝利.這樣的差距也是爵士從西區頭號 種子到不具備主場優勢的差距. : More generally, the major hole they dig themselves into with the : fouls makes it virtually impossible for the Jazz to have a : championship-caliber defense; the only reason they were even in the : hunt last season was because they led the league in offensive : efficiency over the second half of the season. That's been the case : for Utah ever since Sloan adopted the foul-on-every-play strategy : near the end of the Stockton-Malone era (their Finals teams fouled at : much less prodigious rates) -- the defense has been average at best : every season, because you can't be at the top of the league giving : away this many free points. 更一般來說,爵士為自己挖了一個坑使自己在現實中無法達到冠軍隊等級的防守, 讓爵士能保持競爭力的原因是源於他們在後半球季領先聯盟的進功效率. 在史馬時代末期,教皇就開始採用這種犯規在每次進攻的策略.(總冠軍的對手犯規則是 在相當低的比例).這種防守頂多能達到聯盟的平均,因為在送出這麼多罰球分數 的情況下無法達到聯盟的頂尖. : It's amazing that the personnel cost wasn't greater, too. Utah had a : unique approach to avoid foul trouble to its best players -- the : starters would play normal defense, and the bench guys would come in : and just hammer people. While each of the starting five had : reasonable foul rates, four Jazz reserves (Paul Millsap, Ronnie : Price, C.J. Miles and Jason Hart) had among the highest foul rates at : their positions, while Matt Harpring and Kyle Korver weren't far : behind. 讓人非常驚奇的是在個人犯規的影響並不是很大,爵士能使他們最好的球員避免 陷入犯規的麻煩.先發球員採用正常的防守而板凳球員就會採用較為激烈的防守策略. 當先發五位球員都有合理犯規比率時,剩餘的四位球員(Millsap,Price,C.J及Hart)都在 他們的位置擁有最高的犯規比率,而Harpring及Korver也相距不遠. : Korver, actually, is a great example of how this is clearly a : tactical decision for the Jazz. He averaged 3.0 and 3.1 fouls per 36 : minutes the two previous seasons as a member of the Sixers; in Utah : that ballooned to 4.2. Kover是一個很好的例子來說明爵士的戰略.他前兩球季在七六人時每36分鐘的犯規次數 分別為3.0及3.1,在爵士則膨脹到4.2次. : The fouling at least had one positive: often the Jazz wrested the : ball away and the zebras let the contact go. Utah had the league's : third-best opponent turnover rate, forcing miscues on 16.7 percent of : opponent possessions. Combined with a strong performance on the : defensive boards, the Jazz were the toughest team in the league to : get a shot off against (see chart). Utah opponents fired only 94.1 : shots per 100 possessions, which was the main reason the Jazz were : able to finish 12th in defensive efficiency instead of, say, 30th. 犯規至少也有正向的結果,時常爵士使勁的奪取球權而裁判則允許身體接觸的發生. 爵士擁有聯盟第三使對手發生失誤的機率--在對手每次進攻皆有16.7%失誤比率. 這也強烈展現在防守籃板的表現,爵士也是聯盟讓對手錯失球中最堅強的球隊. 爵士對手在100次嘗試中僅有94.1賜有機會投出,這也是為什麼爵士能夠在防守 效率的排名會在第12而非30. : ┌─────────────────────┐ : │Fewest Opp. Shots Per Possessions, 2007-08│ : ├─────────────────────┤ : │TEAM OPP. SHOTS* PER POSS. │ : │Utah 94.1 │ : │Boston 94.7 │ : │Philadelphia 95.2 │ : │Indiana 95.5 │ : │Chicago 95.7 │ : │League average 96.7 │ : ├─────────────────────┤ : │ * Shots = FGA + (FTA * 0.44) │ : └─────────────────────┘ : Speaking of Korver, it was Utah's midseason acquisition of him that : helped turned their season around after a slow start. The Jazz : started the year just 18-17, with Mehmet Okur in particular playing : horribly, before snapping out of their early funk and rolling to the : division title. That was around the same time Korver arrived -- after : trading Gordan Giricek and a first-round pick to Philadelphia to get : him, they went 38-16. 談到 Korver,慢熱的爵士後半球季也因他而獲益良多.在一開始未排除球隊的困擾在分區 (猜測應該是指沒有外線的支援)居於領先地位前Okur處於低潮,爵士的戰績為18勝17敗. 在進行與七六人隊交易以Giricek加第一輪選秀換來Korver之後的戰績為38勝16敗. before snapping out of their early funk 看不太懂,指的是括號說得嗎,還是不是? : His impact was more the threat of his shot than the reality of it -- : he only made 38.8 percent of his 3s for the Jazz. But on a team : devoid of his shooting, his presence loosened up packed-in defenses : -- especially when Okur was off the floor -- and allowed the other : guys to do their thing. Korver最大影響力就是他的投籃,但事實是他在爵士的三分投籃命中率僅有38.8%. 但在他出現後他在Okur休息時也能擴大對手的防守,這也讓其他隊友能完成自己的工作. : As I mentioned, Utah ranked first in offensive efficiency for the : second half of the season, and second for the year as a whole. They : were second in the NBA in field-goal percentage, 2-point shooting : percentage, true shooting percentage, and free-throw attempts per : field-goal attempt (Jerry's teams get it as good as they give it when : it comes to fouling). And although they still rarely took 3-pointers : -- they had the fourth-lowest rate of 3-point shots -- Korver led : them to a solid 37.2 percent. 就如同我所提到的,爵士在後半球季進攻效率排全聯盟第一,在整年度排第二.爵士在 投籃命中率,兩分球命中率,真實投籃命中率(true shooting percentage?)以及每場 罰球命中率(教皇的球隊做的就如同他們給對手的一樣好)都在聯盟排第二.爵士也很少 投三分球,他們擁有第四低的三分球命中率,Korver讓命中率能達到37.2%. : Like I said, it was a championship-caliber offense. And hopefully : they'll stop hacking long enough to prove it. 就如同我所說得,這是一支冠軍球隊的進攻水準,而且希望爵士能能證明這個結果. : Biggest Strength: Interior scoring : This team is a layup machine, plain and simple. Williams is among the : best point guards in basketball and always delivers it to the right : spot, and starters Boozer, Kirilenko and Brewer are all outstanding : finishers around the basket. 最大的力量:得分本色 這支球隊是上籃機器,樸素而且簡單.Williams是籃球中最好的控球後衛之一,他總是能在 正確的時間將球送到手上,而Boozer,Kirilenko及Brewer也是出色的攻擊籃框的選擇. stop hacking long enough 的意思? : Additionally, Utah's offensive system is an unorthodox one by NBA : standards, relying heavily on off-ball screening and cutting to get : players open near the rim for short-range shots. It produces lots of : layups and free throws, especially for players like Brewer and : Harpring who excel at moving without the ball -- Williams will always : find them, and Kirilenko is a good passer too. 此外,爵士的進攻系統也是自外於NBA的標準,倚靠的是無球的掩護和斜切(cut?) 讓球員能夠找到更接近籃框的空檔.這也導致許多的上籃以及罰球,特別是專精於 無球跑動的Brewer及Harpring.Williams每次都會找到他們,而KiriLenko也是個 好的傳球者. : Off the bench, the Jazz don't lose a lot in this regard. I mentioned : Harpring above, but Millsap is also very effective around the basket, : and Price, the backup at point guard, is a good finisher when he gets : to the rim. With layups coming in waves, the Jazz don't need a whole : lot of shooting to be among the league's elite offenses. 在離開板凳後的爵士球員並未離開這樣的準則.我在上面提到Harpring,而Millsap則是 在籃框的周圍表現非常有影響力.加上Price,這位替補的控衛,當接近籃框時,他會是一 位好的終結者.藉由一波一波的上籃,爵士並不需要過多的投籃就能產出聯盟優秀的進攻. : Biggest Weakness: Interior defense : A big reason the Jazz sent opponents to the line so often was because : the backline bailed them out so rarely. The combo of Okur and Boozer : up front is brilliant offensively, but at the defensive end their : weaknesses are more easily exposed. Okur is indifferent at best as a : help defender and can't get off the floor to block shots at the rim, : while Boozer's explosive leaping at the offensive end doesn't seem to : translate into quality defense. 最大的弱點:場上防守 爵士時常讓對手上罰球線一個很重要的原因就是因為最後防線很少能解決問題. 由Okur和Boozer組成的前場在進攻上很優秀但在防守的終端他們的疲弱很容易 被暴露出來.Okur對於補防並不是很有興趣加上彈跳力也無法進行封阻.Boozer 在進攻方的活躍並未轉換為等效能的防守. : Off the bench it doesn't get too much better. Millsap is incredibly : active but incredibly foul-prone, while Jarron Collins is a spent : force whose offensive limitations prevent him from playing much. : Harpring, when used at power forward, is of limited utility as a help : defender and worthless as a shot-blocker. 板凳上球員所能提供的協助也不多,Millsap極為活躍但也很容易製造犯規.Collins 則是極為衰弱的力量,他在進攻端的限制也讓他無法得到太多上場時間. 當Harpring打到大前鋒的位置時,也因為自身的限制無法在補防幫助太多,至於封阻 更是無能為力. : For those reasons, some wonder if the Jazz would be better served by : trading one of their bigs for a wing player and moving Kirilenko to : power forward. He was one of the league's leading shot-blockers from : that position until two years ago, and might be a highly effective : help-side flyswatter if returned to that role. With both frontcourt : starters potentially entering free agency after the season, it's food : for thought. 因為這些原因,有些人認為如果爵士能夠他們交易其中之一的長人換來一個有跳躍力 的選手(wing player?)並把Kirilenko移到大前鋒會更好.他在兩年前是聯盟該位置 封阻領先群的選手之一,而能夠成為一個高效率的火鍋手如果回到那位置的話.在 接下來兩位選手下季即將進入自由球員市場,這值得好好考慮. : Outlook : OK, they foul on every play. The good news is that if they just cut : the foul rate a little bit, they can be good enough defensively to : allow the offense to win games for them. And we have reason to : suspect they can pull that feat off. Between Brewer's emergence as a : stopper on the wings, a likely reduction in playing time for : high-foul players like Harpring and Collins, and, more hopefully, : some recognition by Sloan that this state of affairs must change, it : seems plausible for the Jazz to improve here. 展望: 好吧,既然爵士在每次都想犯規.好消息是如果爵士能減少一點點的犯規比率,他們 的防守就足以藉由進攻來贏得比賽.而我們也有理由爵士能擺脫這項事蹟.在Brewer 出現在兩翼後,可預見較易犯規的Harpring及Collins的上場時間會減少.而且由教皇 所確認的這種打球方式或許也必須改變,看起來在這部分有機會改變. : If so, it's hard to argue with them in the West, because they've got : everything else. The Jazz have go-to stars in both the backcourt and : the frontcourt, have multiple scoring weapons surrounding them, and : have arguably the deepest team in the conference. That last point is : important, because this team is tailor-made for the regular-season : grind --it can easily survive minor injuries and slumps and has no : player who is too indispensable. 如果真的如此的話,在西區的爵士就很難挑出缺點,因為已經萬事具備了. 爵士將準備在後場以及前場發光,他們擁有多樣的得分武器且可算是這區(Conference?) 最有深度的球隊.最後一點也是重要的,因為這支球隊是專為季賽打造的,可以容易度過 小小的傷害及低潮而且沒有太不可或缺的球員. D.W.:我是爵士的國寶呢(ㄋㄟ)(請用台語) : Additionally, they're still on the upswing. Williams is 24, Boozer is : 26, and every key player except Harpring is in his 20s. Okur and : Korver are both likely to have better years than a season ago, but : nobody except perhaps Harpring projects to sharply regress. 除此之外,爵士仍在成長階段,Williams 24歲,Boozer 26歲,加上每一個球員除了 Harpring都是在20多歲的階段(20s?).Okur及Korver被認為至少還可打一季以上的好球, 除了Harpring可能會有大幅的衰退外. : Add it all up and the Jazz, perhaps a bit surprisingly, came out with : the top record in the West when I projected each team's outcome -- : beating out the Lakers by a single game. L.A. has the higher ceiling, : and arguably so does Houston, but the Jazz have a far better : likelihood of getting close to their roof. 當東風出現後,爵士的表現會讓人驚豔,獲得西區最好的戰績.當我就由打敗湖人一場比賽 預測每隊表現時,湖人及火箭擁有較高的限度,但爵士則有更高的可能性達到他們的 頂峰. : Taking things a step further, picking the Jazz to have home-court : advantage by virtue of the best record in the West means one almost : has to pick them to win the conference, too -- between the altitude : and the crowd's impact on the zebras, this team is nigh unbeatable at : home. It's a crowded race and they're one of three teams I see as : having roughly equal odds of making it out, but if I have to pick a : horse out West, this is the one. : Prediction: 58-24, 1st in Northwest Division, 1st in Western : Conference 將眼光放遠些(taking things a step further?),如果爵士能擁有主場優勢,在目前 西區最好的主場戰績也表示他們能贏得西區決賽.藉由高海拔以及觀眾對於裁判的影響 這支球隊在家裏可說近乎無敵. 獲取王座路上佈滿競爭者,爵士是我認為的三支能 突圍而出的球隊之一但如果我要從西區選擇脫穎而出者(horse?),我會選擇爵士. 預測:58勝24敗,西北組第一,西區第一. -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 123.195.53.56
amonway:專業推一個!! 60勝22敗,娘娘組第一,肌肉棒區第一. 10/05 00:15
kaikai1112:如果爵士能夠他們交易其中之一的長人 10/05 00:26
kaikai1112:娘砲 就決定是你了 10/05 00:27
CarlosBoozer:嘎屋~ 10/05 00:34
MOTONARI:正經翻譯也要推! 10/05 03:24
wubai32:中肯 10/05 04:09
malone321214:交易其中之一的長人可以直接改成交易布瑟 10/05 09:24
Poleaxe:推推 10/05 09:59
Kreen: 10/05 10:59
Actus:交易布瑟換得來小王子,除非摸摸大神交出小王子文 10/05 13:51
CW4:感謝翻譯~ 10/05 14:05
cyp001:不色才26歲? 看起來真臭老 10/05 16:48
Cj3636736: 10/05 17:52