作者katako (JJ)
看板cat
標題Re: [新聞] Nutro (美士) 貓飼料可能有問題
時間Wed May 12 10:37:32 2010
我也不知道美士的批號寫在哪裡....沒買過這牌的
唯一幫得上忙的地方就是翻譯了吧。
上次翻譯文章是在電子報上看到的，比較簡短，不確定版上有沒有人餵，
所以沒有翻原網站上的全文(有附受害貓的血檢結果 連結在翻譯的最後一頁)。
看到板上回應，好像蠻多人餵的....那就翻譯做到底吧 (真的蠻累就是了 Orz)
我能做的只有找資訊+提供資訊來源+翻譯，剩下交由板友去判斷吧。
=======================================================================
上篇新聞的原網站:
http://www.pfpsa.org/news.html
=======================================================================
原文:
March 22, 2010: Test results are back on samples believed to be "Nutro
Natural Choice Chicken Meal and Rice" cat food, and "ProPlan Beef & Barley"
and "Orscheln's Oatmeal for Seniors" dog foods.
It is the view of pfpsa.org that Nutro is the most dangerous and poorly
formulated pet food on the market today. Zinc was detected at levels 9 times
that recommended by the National Research Council. The ratio of calcium to
phosphorus isn't even close. Calcium came in at 32,000 parts per million and
phosphorus at 21,000 ppm. Various sources give slightly different figures for
the correct calcium to phosphorus ratio, but they are all close to 8-9 parts
phosphorus for every 10 parts calcium. In addition to calcium levels being 15
times higher than needed for good health, the ratio is 6.5 parts phosphorus
to 10 parts calcium.
The cat affected is about one year old, was kept indoors only, and had been
eating Nutro for about five days. Blood and urine tests indicated liver and
possibly kidney problems, all of which have apparently cleared up since the
pet owner stopped feeding the food. In addition to the mineral screen, we
also tested for aflatoxin and vomitoxin, both of which came back non
detected. We are currently considering running additional tests on the food
and will provide additional information if it becomes available.
It has also come to our attention that the previously reported PetAg milk
replacer problems are ongoing and that the milk formula is continuing to kill
baby animals. With kitten season coming up, this is a product to avoid for
anyone involved in rescue work.
----------
May 4, 2010: RED ALERT!!! Test results are back on a sample of what is
believed to be Nutro Chicken Meal and Rice cat food Lot # 09 01 10 11:03.
This is from the same batch of food we tested below on the March 22, 2010
results. The pet owner's cat nearly died after eating the food for 5 days and
the symptoms appeared to be consistent with toxic levels of Vitamin D.
The Vitamin D levels on this sample are incredibly high. 197 IU/g would be
the same as 197,000 IU/kg (1,000 grams (g) per kilogram (kg)). On a dry
matter basis, assuming 10% moisture for dry food, that would come to 219,000
IU/kg. The maximum allowed by AAFCO standards is 10,000 IU/kg on a dry matter
basis. In other words, this sample is 22 times the maximum amount allowed.
The daily dose of Vitamin D in this food is over 1,000 times the National
Research Council recommendation.
High levels of Vitamin D3, aka cholecalciferol, is the main ingredient in
many rat poisons. Of special interest is the reference to the mechanism of
vitamin D toxicity related to calcium. Previous tests on this sample showed
extremely high levels of calcium in the food.
Where is the FDA? Where are the class action law firms? Why is Nutro able to
continue poisoning our cherished companion animals with no accountability or
competent oversight whatsoever?
More Information: Blood work on the affected cat.
This abstract provides some information on a chronic feeding study done on
cats fed 6,370 IU/100g of diet, describing the chronic toxic effects of
Vitamin D. For comparison, the Nutro sample was at 19,700 IU per 100 grams,
or over three times the level fed in the study. As the primary toxic effect
of Vitamin D is calcification of tissues, this was likely aggravated by the
massive doses of calcium found in this food, which was 15 times the daily NRC
recommendation.
============================ 好累人的翻譯 ===============================
(註: 我只翻 03/22/2010 跟 05/04/2010 兩篇，05/08/2010 那篇太長，改天再說)
2010 年 3 月 22 日
"美士特級成貓 雞+米 (Nutro Natural Choice Chicken Meal & Rice)", "冠能牛肉
+大麥狗食 (ProPlan Beef & Barley)", 還有 "orscheln's oatmeal for seniors" 檢驗
報告出爐了:
美士特級成貓雞+米 檢測報告:
http://www.pfpsa.org/vfeb10092.pdf
冠能牛肉+大麥狗食 與 orscheln's oatmeal for seniors (譯註:這兩款台灣好像沒進)
http://www.pfpsa.org/20101383.pdf
寵物食品產品安全聯盟 (PFPSA.org 譯註:就是原網站啦) 認為，美士是當今市面上
最危險、配方最不好的寵物食品。檢測出的鋅含量為 National Research Council
(美國國家科學研究委員會, NRC) 建議量的 9 倍。鈣含量為 32,000 ppm，磷含量
為 21,000 ppm。不同的機構提供的建議磷鈣比有稍稍不同，不過大約都落在
磷:鈣 = 8~9:10 左右。(美士的)鈣含量不但為建議量的 15 倍，其磷鈣比也不對
－－(美士) 磷:鈣 = 6.5:10
受害的貓約一歲大，只有在室內活動，吃了約 5 天的美士。驗血跟驗尿的結果指出
肝臟跟腎臟出了狀況，不過在停餵之後已經恢復。除了mineral screen (檢測礦物質?)
之外，還有加驗黃麴毒素 (aflatoxin) 跟 vomitoxin (譯名不知，有請強者)，但是
這兩種都沒有驗出。我們 (PFPSA) 正在考慮追加檢驗。如果有新的資訊，會盡快提供。
----------
2010 年 5 月 4 日
紅色警戒!!!
"美士特級成貓 雞+米 (Nutro Natural Choice Chicken Meal & Rice)" 批號 09 01 10
11:03 的檢驗報告出爐了。這跟 3 月 22 日提到的是同一批貓食。受害的貓吃了 5 天
差點死掉。其症狀跟維他命D過量相符。
樣本中驗出的維他命D含量高得令人不敢置信。
http://www.pfpsa.org/nutrochickenmealrice.pdf
197 IU/g，等於 197,000 IU/kg (1,000 g = 1 kg)。以 dry matter basis (譯注:只算
乾的部分，不含水分)來算，假設乾糧中有 10% 水分，真正的數值應為 219,000 IU/kg
(dry matter basis, DMB)。AAFCO 的維他命D最大可接受值為 10,000 IU/kg (DMB)。
換句話說，檢驗結果為最大可接受值的 22 倍。以美國國家科學研究委員會的建議量
來看，餵這貓食一天攝取的維他命D超量 1000 倍以上。
高濃度的維他命D3，也就是 cholecalciferol，是許多老鼠藥的主要成分。引起我
(此指 Don Earl)特別注意的一點是維他命D toxicity mechanism (譯註:這部分要請
強者補充，生化跟我不合 Orz) 跟鈣之間的關連－－記得上次(3/22)的檢驗結果中
有極高含量的鈣。
FDA到底在幹嘛? 專辦集體訴訟的律師事務所們到底在幹嘛? 為什麼美士可以繼續
毒害我們的寶貝寵物而不受嚴格監督，不負責?
更多資訊:
受害貓的血/尿檢結果
http://www.pfpsa.org/catslabwork.pdf
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8593288
這篇(論文)摘要有餵食過量維他命D的長期研究。美士檢測出的的維他命D含量為此
研究中使用量 (6,370 IU/kg) 的三倍。維他命D過量的主要影響為組織鈣化，而且
高含量的鈣非常可能會使狀況加劇 (美士檢測出的鈣含量為NRC建議量的 15 倍)。
======================== 終於翻完了 Orz ========================
--
欺負動物的都該去擼壁 \(￣ε(#￣\)☆╰╮o(￣皿￣///)
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 98.212.212.195
推 mardyfish:天哪受害的貓咪不知道還好嗎\ 61.231.146.70 05/12 10:38
你的回應好快 嚇我一跳 XD 貓咪聽說恢復了
※ 編輯: katako 來自: 98.212.212.195 (05/12 10:40)
→ mardyfish:剛好一進貓版就看到XD 61.231.146.70 05/12 10:41
※ 編輯: katako 來自: 98.212.212.195 (05/12 10:42)
→ GoRunFast:我給我家貓兒吃近一年的美士了0.0...... 210.71.22.22 05/12 11:20
→ GoRunFast:但他好像沒什麼病痛? 只不過他都會有蹲 210.71.22.22 05/12 11:24
→ GoRunFast:的動作 然後才整個趴下 210.71.22.22 05/12 11:24
推 whale1124:我正在努力看你所提供5/8號的那則新聞140.109.113.141 05/12 11:45
→ whale1124:果然不該相信廠商的片面之詞呀!!140.109.113.141 05/12 11:46
→ GoRunFast:我前天才把放在家快兩個月的包裝給丟了 210.71.22.22 05/12 11:48
→ GoRunFast:現在這包也快吃完了(雞+米) 順便換別間 210.71.22.22 05/12 11:48
→ GoRunFast:有什麼比較好的牌子嗎??當初是看美士毛 210.71.22.22 05/12 11:49
→ GoRunFast:柔順+便便正常才一直吃下去 210.71.22.22 05/12 11:49
推 wing0404:感謝原po的用心!!還好我已經都沒用美士了 163.19.22.238 05/12 11:49
→ wing0404:話說有版友知道ANF挑嘴貓的評價好不好嗎? 163.19.22.238 05/12 11:51
→ Szmanda:FDA跟這網站，我會選擇FDA210.240.176.185 05/12 12:19
→ Szmanda:鋅中毒需要極高劑量+長時間才會顯現210.240.176.185 05/12 12:22
→ Szmanda:而且那個批號，是美士2009年因為製造工廠210.240.176.185 05/12 12:23
→ Szmanda:配方錯誤所recall的那一批，也不是近期的210.240.176.185 05/12 12:23
→ Szmanda:這網站炒冷飯的用意是?而且美士總公司已210.240.176.185 05/12 12:24
→ Szmanda:經針對他們2009年發布的消息提出告訴了210.240.176.185 05/12 12:25
推 kera714:之前回收是8 22 10 跟這次驗的09 01 10 61.62.183.114 05/12 13:38
→ kera714:有一樣嗎@@? 61.62.183.114 05/12 13:38
→ kera714:而且上次回收是鋅含量有問題..這次主要是 61.62.183.114 05/12 13:41
→ kera714:鈣跟維生素D過高...兩者不一樣吧? 61.62.183.114 05/12 13:42
推 willstop:感謝k大的翻譯 翻譯真的很累～ 140.112.4.170 05/12 15:23
推 kazushige:感謝翻譯～ 111.185.72.5 05/12 15:30
推 niwako:翻譯辛苦了，真的很感謝! 59.124.84.31 05/12 15:52
→ niwako:我是覺得，新裝版的美士特成真的變了 59.124.84.31 05/12 15:53
→ niwako:上次買了1包7kg，家裡兩隻貓變得不是那麼愛 59.124.84.31 05/12 15:54
→ niwako:吃了吐得有些頻繁(當然和換毛也有關) 59.124.84.31 05/12 15:55
→ niwako:立刻就不敢餵，朋友的貓也是一吃就拉...b 59.124.84.31 05/12 15:56
→ niwako:後來又給另一隻貓吃，吃的當天就吐...orz 59.124.84.31 05/12 15:57
→ niwako:可以確定我家這包特成，4隻貓吃了都不舒服! 59.124.84.31 05/12 15:57
→ niwako:美士幼貓倒是還好，吃了並沒有特別的反應 59.124.84.31 05/12 15:58
→ niwako:總之貓不喜歡就立刻不餵了，大家也要多小心 59.124.84.31 05/12 15:59
推 Camillal:有疑慮就別餵囉，不是非它不可吧 122.116.128.72 05/12 15:59