【Ｐtt養雞場】 郵差來按鈴囉 看板《SYSOP》
Name :新手 (小雞) 生日 :07年 4月23日 (中年 11歲)
體: 263/673 法: 18/18 攻擊力:1197 敏捷 :3171 知識 :0
快樂 :16165 滿意 :3498 疲勞 :270 氣質 :61 體重 :7.28
病氣 :0 乾淨 :0 食物 :95 大補丸:0 藥品 :8
◢◢
◤ ●
● ●● ● ◎●
● ● ● ● ● ◣
● ● ● ● ●●● ● ● ●● ●●
● ● ● ● ● ● ⊙● ● ⊙●
● ● ● ● ● ● ◣ ● ◣
● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●
● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●
●●●╲●● ●●● ●●●
╱ ╲ ／ ＼ ／ ＼
/\╲ /\╲ /|\ /|\ /|\ /|\
很乾淨..快飽死了!.累了..很快樂..很滿足..
--
轉錄幾篇新聞給大家看
--
French rivals vie for final votes
The two candidates vying to become the next president of France have traded
barbs on a final day of campaigning ahead of Sunday's run-off election.
Socialist Segolene Royal told a radio interviewer that electing rival Nicolas
Sarkozy could spark riots and violence.
But Mr Sarkozy laughed off her attack, describing himself as "serene" ahead
of the vote, and blaming Ms Royal's comments on her position in the polls.
Latest polls suggest Mr Sarkozy holds a firm lead after Wednesday's TV debate.
A new Ifop poll for the Le Monde newspaper put Mr Sarkozy at 53%, with Ms
Royal trailing with 47%.
Ms Royal visited the western region of Brittany on Friday, while Mr Sarkozy
laid a wreath at a war memorial in the Alpine region.
The campaigns end on Friday as voting in some overseas French regions takes
place on Saturday.
See the candidates' poll ratings
The latest Ifop poll was conducted on 3 May among 858 people who had watched
the often fiery televised debate.
It found that the two candidates' scores were unchanged from the polling
company's previous survey before the debate.
Another poll by TNS Sofres for the Le Figaro daily showed Mr Sarkozy nine
percentage points ahead of Ms Royal, with 54.5% and 45.5% respectively, up
2.5 points on a previous poll by the same pollster.
The BBC's Caroline Wyatt, in Montpellier, says most French voters have now
made up their minds, with only 10% still undecided.
Centrist Francois Bayrou, defeated in the first round of voting, has said he
will not vote for Mr Sarkozy.
But analysts say Ms Royal's pursuit of Mr Bayrou's "floating" voters has not
been a success.
Our correspondent says that although Mr Sarkozy may be a deeply divisive
figure, few doubt his competence or ability to get things done and most are
now planning to choose the path of reform he has laid out.
'Time for decisions'
Speaking in Brittany, Ms Royal played down the significance of the opinion
polls, saying they could not be trusted.
"There is therefore still hope for those you think that it is all still to
play for," she said.
In a radio interview earlier on Friday, she warned against electing Mr
Sarkozy, describing him as a "dangerous choice".
"It is my responsibility today to alert people to the risk of [his]
candidature with regards to the violence and brutality that would be
unleashed in the country," she said.
In another interview Mr Sarkozy gently mocked his rival, who he described as
"not in a good mood this morning".
"It must be the opinion polls," he added.
Later, Mr Sarkozy visited an Alpine memorial to fighters of the French
resistance movement in World War II.
"There is a time and place for explanations and one for decisions, and this
is the time and place for decisions," he said afterwards.
Ill-tempered debate
Both candidates held their final big rallies on Thursday, Ms Royal in Lille
in the north and Mr Sarkozy at the other end of the country in Montpellier.
Ms Royal, 53, called for a French rebirth, saying she offered a safe choice
for those wanting "a protecting France, a fraternal France, a competitive
France".
Their sometimes ill-tempered TV debate on Wednesday, watched by an estimated
23m people, left both claiming victory.
The rivals clashed over employment, the economy and law and order, but
opinion polls showed the debate had not reversed Mr Sarkozy's momentum.
Mr Sarkozy won 31.2% of the votes and Ms Royal won 25.9% in the first round
of the election on 22 April.
From: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/6622929.stm
--
Convicted killer fears his last moments
POSTED: 11:30 a.m. EDT, May 4, 2007
Story Highlights
‧ Lethal injection is most common method of execution in the U.S
‧ Some say injection amounts to cruel and unusual punishment
‧ One inmate caught in the controversy says, "I block it out"
By Ashley Fantz
CNN
NASHVILLE, Tennessee (CNN) -- Philip Workman has prepared to die three times
before.
Next week, the convicted killer is prepared to face execution for a fourth
time, to say goodbye to his daughter again, give away his belongings, and
once again eat his final meal.
And he'll wait to see if a court will again step in before the needle pierces
his skin.
Workman, 53, has spent half his life in a death row cell in Nashville's
Riverbend Prison, ever since his conviction in 1982 for killing a Memphis
police officer in a botched armed robbery at a Wendy's restaurant.
On Sunday, Tennessee prison guards will lock him in an isolated cell with a
small window overlooking the prison yard, beginning three days of "Death
Watch."
He will be fitted for the drab scrubs he'll wear May 9, when the state is set
to inject him with a mixture of drugs that will kill him.
Workman said he doesn't feel much like a person anymore. He has become a pile
of legal briefs, appeals, depositions.
And he is angry, sorry, scared and depressed.
Of the officer who was killed, Workman says: "Any loss of life is a tragedy."
Too little time, too many errors
Lethal injection has become the most common method of execution in the United
States. Last year, 52 of the 53 executions in the country were by injection.
Of the 38 states that have the death penalty, 37 states allow lethal
injection.
Thirty years after it was developed, the practice is drawing protest as cruel
and unusual punishment, a claim supported by recent medical studies that say
the mixture of chemicals used may cause a slow and excruciating death.
The debate over lethal injection has led 11 states, including Tennessee, to
issue temporary bans on the process pending further study. Tennessee's ban is
set to end shortly before Workman's scheduled execution.
"It almost makes me want to choose the electric chair," Workman said in an
interview with CNN. "They are saying in this report that a lot [of prisoners]
have suffered, they wouldn't be able to speak. You can't move to say
anything. You're frozen."
Saying there were "deficiencies" in Tennessee's lethal injection instruction
manual, Gov. Phil Bredesen rescinded it in February and gave the state's
commissioner of correction 90 days to write a new one.
Bredesen, who declined CNN's request for an interview, has stayed the
executions of four death row inmates, but is allowing Workman's to proceed.
Tennessee's rescinded manual appeared to confuse lethal injection with
electrocution. For example, it called for an inmate's head to be shaved, and
for officials to have a fire extinguisher, electrode gel, an emergency
generator and an electrician present.
On April 30, the state issued a new set of lethal injection procedures,
removing those protocols, but the "cocktail" of lethal drugs remains
unchanged.
Drugs are a "failure"
Lethal injection's three-drug cocktail was proposed in 1977 by an Oklahoma
medical examiner and anesthesiologist as a cheaper and more humane
alternative to the electric chair. In a recent interview with CNN, Dr. Gary
Chapman said the time has come to revisit the cocktail. "It may be time to
change it," he said.
Until 2005, it had not been scientifically researched.
In a study published in April by the Public Library of Science -- a nonprofit
organization of scientists and doctors -- six scientists spent three years
analyzing more than 50 medical examiner reports of North Carolina and
California prisoners who had been injected with the short-acting anesthetic
thiopental, the paralytic pancuronium bromide and the heart stopper potassium
chloride.
The study concluded the drug protocol a "failure" because the prisoners had
below acceptable levels of thiopental in their systems indicating they
probably suffered immense pain before they died.
"I was shocked that there had been no research on what is being used on
humans, when in veterinary medicine, pancuronium is strongly discouraged,"
said study author Dr. Teresa Zimmers, an assistant professor of surgery at
the University of Miami School of Medicine.
She also participated in a 2005 medical review of 49 prisoner toxicology
reports from Arizona, Georgia, North Carolina and South Carolina that drew
similar conclusions.
Health professionals are barred from participating in executions, so prison
personnel without medical expertise often perform injections.
Florida has been studying its lethal injection procedures since it took 34
minutes and two rounds of injections to kill Florida prisoner Angel Diaz in
December. His executioner, a prison employee, missed his vein and witnesses
described Diaz grimacing.
A moratorium continues in California - home to America's largest death row
with 664 inmates - after a federal judge ruled in December that prison
personnel are improperly trained and the execution chamber is too dark and
poorly designed.
Missouri's lethal injection administrator was revealed in 2006 to be a
dyslexic surgeon who had been sued 20 times. The physician admitted he
sometimes mixed drugs wrong.
No more visits
An affidavit shows a physician involved in the 2005 and 2007 studies reviewed
child killer Robert Coe's autopsy. He was lethally injected in April 2000 in
Tennessee.
The doctor concluded Coe "was probably awake, suffocating in silence and felt
the searing pain of injection of intravenous potassium chloride."
Workman reads over the article about the studies as if it's some legalese he
can't quite comprehend.
"I block it out," he finally says.
He doesn't want anyone to see him anymore. On May 9, his daughter and brother
are to stay away, his lawyers, too. He wants people to know he's sorry for
robbing that Wendy's and that a police officer died.
Even if he gets another stay, he says he can't endure more of this.
Of his return to Death Watch, he remarks, "I don't just want to visit this
time."
From: http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/05/02/lethal.injection/index.html
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.113.124.58