※ 引述《Kubelik (回憶)》之銘言：
: http://www.wretch.cc/blog/milstein&article_id=17732820
: 反對「二氧化碳導致全球暖化」這個前提的反方，如：有科學家認為是太陽輻
: 射的增強導致溫室效應，並以火星溫度為例，所以，這部紀錄片在傳達全球暖
: 化議題這件事來講，在我看來實在是很不嚴謹的。而我相信導演、製作團隊不
: 可能不知道這個論證的薄弱。因為我相信高爾本人關於這個議題的研究絕對是
: 比電影呈現的要完整許多，一定有對「（人類製造的）二氧化碳導致全球暖化
: 」這個論證有相當詳實的論據，而紀錄片的製作，為什麼在議題的探討上卻會
: 失衡呢？
http://www.onthemedia.org/yore/transcripts/transcripts_090304_reality.html
ROSS GELBSPAN: In the very early 90s, when the science was still uncertain,
that kind of reporting was appropriate. In 1995, this intergovernmental panel
on climate change -- and this includes more than 2,000 scientists from a
hundred countries in what is the largest and most rigorously peer-reviewed
scientific collaboration in history -- said global warming is definitely
happening due to human activities. This is a fact. And yet, the press
continues to treat the story as though there were two sides to it. Public
relations specialists of big coal and big oil really have exploited the ethic
of journalistic balance.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 210.201.58.207