→ davidlo:這題我也想推. 但是UpToDate有一篇說 Lachman 比 Anterior 02/17 01:48
→ davidlo:Drawer 的 Sensitivity和Specificity 都高一點... 但是有 02/17 01:48
→ davidlo:另一個研究不認同. 這種有爭議的, 考什麼考阿... 02/17 01:49
→ davidlo:這題我也會申覆. 02/17 01:49
關於A這個選項
貝氏第七版中文版 p.535 脛骨向前拉動時發生痙攣現象,可能是anterior cruciate
ligment 撕裂傷,前拉徵相呈陽性反應(positive anterior drawer sign)
下面還有Lachman測試,不過也只有說:關節明顯向前移動可能是anterior cruciate
ligment撕裂傷;也沒指出這兩種檢查對診斷跟使用時機的差異之處
另外還在網路找到這篇http://www.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/reprint/77-B/4/586.pdf
第一頁就有這段:The same examiner performed all the physical examinations, which
included the Lachman test (Torg, Conrad and Kalen 1976),
the anterior-drawer test at 90°of knee flexion, and the
pivot-shift test. Positive Lachman and drawer tests were
defined by any difference between injured and normal
knees.
應該(A) (C)都可以才是
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 125.229.33.195