[新聞] 全面啟動 導演訪談

[alljerry04 (Jas)]

新聞來源：
http://moviesblog.mtv.com/2010/11/29/christopher-nolan-inception-theories/

http://tinyurl.com/2vblwoq

關於結局的圖騰是不是一直在轉，這不重要因為 Cobb不在乎了

兩組小孩是一樣的？不，他們不一樣，正如imdb的cast所示，這是兩組小孩

是否運用隱晦的手法讓電影有一個以上的結局？不，只有一個結局


Question: Is the movie about film-making? Cobb is the director, Ariadne is
the writer, Eames is the art director, Saito is the producer and Fischer is
the audience.

Answer: I didn't intend to make a film about film-making, but I gravitated
toward the creative process that I know.

Question: Are Cobb's kids at the end still part of the dream?

Answer: The kids are not wearing the same clothes at the end. And they do
age. We were working with two sets of kids.

Question: Does the top keep spinning at the end of the movie?

Answer: The important thing is that Cobb is not looking at the top. He
doesn't care.

Question: Do you use ambiguity as a storytelling tool to make sure the film
has more than one answer?

Answer: Oh no, I've got an answer.


--
喔～東吳什麼最讓人抓狂～選～課～系～統 慢慢慢慢登不進去～選～課～系～統

如果折磨學生是你的願望～選～課～系～統 那就駭客入侵讓學生抓狂～選～課～系～統

準備！選課系統 選課系統 選課系統 選課系統 靠腰～～～■★

--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) 
◆ From: 114.32.40.132
推 pchou17:怎麼還是回答的有點模糊 = =
推 AAAdolph:有講跟沒講一樣....
推 macrose:夢還沒有醒，但因為Cobb不在意了，醒不醒就不重要了
→ macrose:全面啟動裡，Cobb遭遇過的很多場景都發生了好幾次，因為他
→ macrose:在一層又一層的夢裡迷了路
→ moneydream:本來就是開放式結局.搞不懂老是有人在爭論那個陀螺.
推 krara:只有一個結局。
推 krara:忘了前面那篇文章的觀點：小孩的臉才是主角的圖騰。那個陀螺
→ krara:是Male的。
推 gausong:關於結局的圖騰是不是一直在轉，這不重要因為我不在乎了
→ gausong:我覺得這就是一部爽片...只是它的爽是在讓你一直推理而已
推 tammic:左耳的花已婚，右耳的花單身。寂寞的時候就想起那年
→ tammic:哈哈哈哈推錯抱歉
推 belief0816:他哪有說沒有醒...