精華區beta movie 關於我們 聯絡資訊
原文網址 http://www.cultframe.com/2011/09/warriors-rainbow-seediq-bale-film-wei-te-sheng/ 替代網址 http://tinyurl.com/43kcg5n 標題: Warriors of the Rainbow: Seediq Bale. A film Wei Te-Sheng. 68th Venice International Film Festival. Contest Maurizio G. De Bonis There is no doubt that among indigenous peoples and colonial armies, each person sensitive to the issue of civil rights to choose to side with the latter, as it is obvious that the invaders do more despicable action that harms the system deeply existential populations that rightly have no intention of being dominated. Violence Finsch to generate violence, to trigger conflicts that can only end in a bloodbath. And these events do arise hatred for generations and generations, until the memory will run its course. The Taiwanese director Wei Te-Sheng tried to tell with Warriors of the Rainbow: Seediq Bale really a story of this type. The nasty and ugly (humanly) Japanese took possession of Taiwan in 1895 after a political treaty and try to dominate the island's aboriginal naively, thinking simply be higher and then crush them with ease. But the reality is far more complex and fortitude, pride and attachment to the traditions of Seediq Bale factors become indestructible. Warriors of the Rainbow: Seediq Bale 's all here. Nothing more. This is a work of absolute predictability that is based exclusively on the screen of the opposition between "good" and "evil", between the idealization of "ancestral civilizations" and contempt for the supposed "culture of modernity and wealth." The problem is the film lasts a hundred and fifty minutes and the whole parable narrative is characterized by fierce fighting, the action scenes in the jungle, shooting and sticking. Within two hours, the viewer is overwhelmed by unnecessary splashes of blood and flying heads, mass suicides, massacres with gas bombs. To bring to light the tragic story of Seediq Bale was certainly no need to submit the fuitore to one hundred fifty minutes of senseless carnage. The director has decided to take the road most banal and tragically spectacular. Among shameful reflection on high "banality of evil" and colonialism, and a "butcher film", it is certainly easier (and perhaps more beneficial to the economic level of evidence) to build a giant bloody sideshow rather than bore the audience with an argument filsofico exploitation and oppression of man by man. The direction is predictable. Never a flicker, an invention, an unconventional visual tract. Only daring races in the luxuriant nature, screams, disemboweled bodies, gunfire, jugular severed, ambushes, massacres, brutal revenge and murder. The inserts digital, then, are quite insignificant. Indeed, not just technically sublime. In the end, the rhetoric of protecting the harmony of peoples living in harmony with nature (and who are strongly attached to their ancestral rules) becomes so cumbersome that the emphatic and remarkable patterns that led to the realization of this end up losing their undoubted strength. Te-Sheng Wei That is certainly a missed opportunity. His work will probably not be remembered because he did emerge from the abyss of the dramatic fate of the History Seediq Bale but discounted because of the spectacular battle scenes and tricks used by the aborigines to kill the Japanese soldiers. In short, the film does not always makes a good service to historical events and misfortunes of the people. But that's another story. @ CultFrame 08/2011 PLOT 1895. After I treated of Shimonoseki, Japan took possession of Taiwan. After brief fighting, the Japanese implement their rule over the whole territory, except for a mountainous area inhabited by the proud people of Bale Seediq gift a few years of subjugation decide to free themselves from invaders. Led by leaders Mouna Rudo, Aborigines put in serious difficulty the Japanese army, not accustomed to fighting in the jungle and along rugged trails. In the end everything will end with a gruesome bloodbath. 影片 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mi-C4eis2-Y&feature=player_embedded
CREDITS Title: Warriors of the Rainbow: Seediq Bale / Director: Wei Te-Sheng / Screenplay: Wei Te-Sheng / Photo: Ting-chang Chin / Editor: Po-Wen Chen, Milk Up / Music: Ricky Ho / Interpreters: Ching-Tai Lin, Umin Boya, Masanobu Ando, eediq gift a few years of -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 61.227.180.205
johnlilili:這一篇看GOOGLE翻譯大意是說戰鬥場面太多? 09/01 19:50
filmwalker:這篇就是真正的影評了 只是是負評...... 09/01 19:51
filmwalker:是沒必要的血腥太多 09/01 19:51
NDSLite:這篇內容比較多 似乎也強調本片血腥太多 09/01 19:51
CMPunk:嗯,說那些場面很多是沒必要的,噴血、人頭亂飛、亂炸 09/01 19:51
CMPunk:有點像CULT片的描述XDDD 09/01 19:52
qazxswptt:吳宇森:要我剪片就是逼我戰鬥爆破 XD 09/01 19:52
shinshong:有沒有必要,怎麼定義啊? 09/01 19:52
ISAM1:惡評阿 果然看來真的不用花這錢了 09/01 19:53
jb8673194:真的可惜了!如果沒有片長限制或許會更好... 09/01 19:54
mirror08:血漿四濺 頭顱亂飛 09/01 19:55
ABBOBO:蔡明亮的片子威尼斯評價最好 怎麼沒看台灣人都去看 09/01 19:55
McRay:看來2.5小時版本會讓人認為日本人很平面化的邪惡 09/01 19:55
McRay:讓血腥的片段變得莫名其妙 09/01 19:56
des1267:會看的就會去看 不會看的就算拿到金獅也是照酸 09/01 19:57
ichirukia:冏>"< 09/01 19:57
qazxswptt:戰鬥連發導致這種觀感?真是越來越亂了... 09/01 19:57
losesoul01:推樓上 這版本只讓人覺得是單純的反抗暴政而已 09/01 19:57
losesoul01:5分鐘片花裡呈現出來的掙扎似乎沒在2.5小時版裡被看到 09/01 19:58
xWadex:請問各位..2.5hr是血腥...那4hr是什麼?? 09/01 19:58
losesoul01:我說的樓上是指McRay大 09/01 19:58
goodcial:有人看過2.5hr的版本了? 09/01 19:59
angolmois:看來交給約翰吳剪片就是天大的錯誤,畢竟不是自己導的, 09/01 19:59
widec:一部片如果150分鐘裡有100分鐘在戰鬥 我也會覺得蠻差勁的... 09/01 19:59
angolmois:一樣的片子不同人剪就有不同感受。 09/01 20:00
widec:記得不知哪裡看到 戰鬥場面有100分鐘 09/01 20:00
CMPunk:糟糕,好像很對我這CULT片愛好者的胃口XDD 09/01 20:00
qazxswptt:會不會是跟吳宇森的剪片邏輯有關,爆破後就是更多爆破XD 09/01 20:00
AHMD:剪掉的部分到底是哪些? 此版本很多片段被認為不必要 09/01 20:00
shinshong:猜的啦,說不定5分鐘預告的起承轉合還比2.5hr版的還好 09/01 20:00
angolmois:不過最大的錯誤應該算是報威尼斯吧,根本填錯志願。 09/01 20:00
hens:這篇也說著重太多屠殺畫面... 09/01 20:01
ISAM1:原來如此 葡萄牙人不懂 義大利人不懂 香港人的錯 09/01 20:01
angolmois:如果整部片有2/3是戰鬥,那根本就是B級片吧~ 09/01 20:01
AHMD:我看完預告覺得起承轉合還不錯阿 真是太奇怪了 09/01 20:01
Leo4891:這篇結尾提到本片以過多場景和手法描述原住民怎麼殺日軍 09/01 20:02
qazxswptt:樓上我不是怪香港人 別曲解 那只是玩笑 我很喜歡吳的片 09/01 20:02
angolmois:我猜報威尼斯的動機只是想順勢宣傳,但目前評價似乎不好 09/01 20:02
Leo4891:卻沒有對於歷史和之間的誤會作良好的介紹 09/01 20:03
CMPunk:http://cinephilia.net/venice2011 華人影評評價都很低啊 09/01 20:03
ichirukia:那就要接受評論了 09/01 20:03
qazxswptt:只是因為大家都還沒看過 看別人影評有隔層紗的感覺 09/01 20:03
angolmois:搞不好剪著剪著連吳都興奮起來,覺得魏比自己還獵奇啊XD 09/01 20:03
Leo4891:可能當成三百壯士剪了XD 09/01 20:04
CMPunk:以後蠻想比一下兩種版本的不同,不知道這個短的版本看不看 09/01 20:04
handfoxx:1.2分 09/01 20:04
ichirukia:樓上害我笑了 09/01 20:04
CMPunk:得到 09/01 20:04
qazxswptt:因為吳宇森說過他剛去美國時英文還不是很好 劇組問他 09/01 20:04
angolmois:今天早上我做的預告片就是當成三百壯士剪啊XD 09/01 20:05
qazxswptt:爆炸場面這樣拍好不好 結果外國人誤會 以為他要更多爆炸 09/01 20:05
qazxswptt:結果就是炸過頭炸翻了 他自己都有拿這開玩笑過 09/01 20:06
CMPunk:應該要有白鴿跟吳導致敬一下的,不知道以前台灣有沒有XDD 09/01 20:07
AHMD:這版本真的是慘了 這樣版權會賣不出去吧? 雖然英法都買了... 09/01 20:07
CMPunk:會有CULT片愛好者看吧 每個人口味不同 09/01 20:08
qazxswptt:發行商買前都有看試片的 也不是傻子 剪輯版的感受是否 09/01 20:08
CMPunk:不過不知道票房會如何就是 09/01 20:08
mirror08:不過總算不是之前很多人擔心的<悶片>了 看評論應該很難 09/01 20:08
shimo:說不定就像五分鐘版~魏導含淚重剪XD 09/01 20:08
mirror08:睡著 XD 09/01 20:08
qazxswptt:跟市售版觀感一樣 老實說一切只能等上片最準啦 09/01 20:08
angolmois:http://0rz.tw/XohCb 300壯士—賽德克的逆襲 09/01 20:10
qazxswptt:那個華人評價低要打折 搜狐 網易 外滩画报 新浪文 汇报 09/01 20:12
johnlilili:看來要等上片了 2.5小時可能不能期待了?XD 09/01 20:13
qazxswptt:一堆入口網站跟奇摩一樣 你覺得會很有說服力? 09/01 20:13
ryowu:吳宇森黑掉了... 09/01 20:14
shimo:也許日後會在DVD收影展版... 09/01 20:14
Leo4891:噗 史詩片剪成CULT片也太扯了 09/01 20:15
AHMD:感覺當初不如不要去參賽耶 說不定國內先放映還比較容易外銷? 09/01 20:15
mirror08:華語影評人的那個頁面採用的是滿分四分制 最低是零分 09/01 20:15
qazxswptt:不開玩笑啦 說吳黑掉太早 就算有也是非戰之罪 09/01 20:15
ZenUp:國際版的影評普遍說這片血腥、爆破場面太多 不明所以XD 09/01 20:16
qazxswptt:畢竟自己心血觀感叫別人剪 本來就是一種賭注 不能怪誰 09/01 20:16
widec:去參賽的主要目的是賣片啦 賽片想也知道不可能拿金獅 09/01 20:16
mirror08:大陸的門戶網站有新媒體功用 跟奇摩還是不一樣 09/01 20:16
qazxswptt:真好真壞 還是日後看過正式版才是見真章 09/01 20:17
McRay:不知道魏德聖對剪接版本的感受如何 09/01 20:17
ZenUp:不過板上之前有人爆雷說完整版上集都在鋪陳,沒啥戰鬥場面.. 09/01 20:17
CMPunk:他一定有看過吧 09/01 20:17
angolmois:最初可能是打算載譽歸國順勢宣傳,但可能適得其反。 09/01 20:17
ZenUp:所以還是等上映再看實際情況囉 09/01 20:17
angolmois:我也覺得有國人那麼大期待的大片在外國首映不太是滋味。 09/01 20:18
AHMD:他有在媒體上說他本來是無法接受 看了別人剪完的部分覺得好像 09/01 20:19
AHMD:還可以 所以也就接受(聽起來很勉強?) 09/01 20:20
angolmois:這也是身為導演必備的功力吧,要懂得化繁為簡。 09/01 20:21
shimo:是沒時間修正了吧...剪片子沒抓到主軸的話 09/01 20:21
angolmois:任何電影本來就都會有導演版,也就是導演認為最理想版本 09/01 20:21
shimo:沒有抓到那個FU...千頭萬緒不知從何下手啊(經驗者談) 09/01 20:22
CMPunk:沒必要重剪吧 如果吳是以商業片考量剪的話 09/01 20:22
angolmois:但為了票房或參展,就需要依不同需要有不同剪接策略。 09/01 20:22
angolmois:搞不好國際版拿到美國放會進TOP10O喔XD 09/01 20:23
AHMD:樓上說的也不無可能XD 09/01 20:24
ichirukia:很喜歡樓上的推文 都好幽默 09/01 20:25
ichirukia:指ANGOLMOIS 09/01 20:25
widec:告白了!! XDDD 09/01 20:25
qazxswptt:angolmois我也愛你 09/01 20:26
MakeAWash:____最愛酸口中酸民都是專業電影人 現在看上面推文 呵呵 09/01 20:26
mirror08:top100是指imdb還是票房 09/01 20:26
CMPunk:上面推文在告白 09/01 20:27
AHMD:樓下會是angolmois的回應嗎?XD 09/01 20:27
angolmois:我本來是要打TOP10的... 09/01 20:29
eramaya:他可能看到麥克貝的片賣太好 09/01 20:43
jojomickey2:看來真的很像爽片,參加這種影展還滿不搭的~ 09/01 20:56
ACGamigo:shooting and sticking 莫名的好笑XDDDD 09/01 20:57
ABBOBO:應該說這2.5小時版本被剪成爽片了 09/01 21:03
gunng:這種說法我會想到punisher war zone的影評耶XDD 09/01 21:22
quicknick:war zone很過癮啊! 09/01 21:25
QQ5566:吳宇森QQ 09/01 21:33
xWadex:都沒看過就能比較2.5hr跟4hr也太神了... 09/01 21:47
handfoxx:4.5 hr 09/01 21:49
longtree:台灣觀眾看電影 什麼時候在意威尼斯的評價了 XD 09/01 22:39
xholmes:2.5hr版本該不會只剩下戰爭場面吧?魏導一定很心痛。 09/01 23:12
onetwo01:心痛個頭,最好國際版怎麼剪他一點也不知道.. 09/02 08:45
black7447:...那麼血腥喔...開始想看了 09/02 11:47