推 Caspor:其實高分原因 應該有很大一部分是內容夠多 加上語法錯誤少 12/27 22:21
→ Caspor:字數夠多自然就能包括很多內容 但很少人能寫到七八段 12/27 22:22
推 ATO:那也有可能喔~大家都參考看看吧^^ 12/27 22:24
因為有人來問我的AWA怎麼考的 所以我又來分享了
我是考GMAT的AWA
我搞不清楚RE的AWA和AT的有何不同@@
所以考RE的同學們可以參考一下我的模版再改成適合的吧^^
AWA分成argument和issue
issue:
我的issue是用我之前波的那個托福作文模版(請爬文 不再贅述)
argument:
就是找出文章的弱點攻擊
我是依照莫老上課講義分成幾種錯誤
有以篇概全,錯誤類比,過份簡單,統計數字有問題,因果關係有誤,無關推論,這六種錯誤
總共寫五段 但傳說是寫出題目越多錯會越高分
所以正式考試我是寫六段 首段+四個錯+結尾
(我打字有練過可以打快一點 要不然打五段應該也可以吧)
首段
In this argument, the author concludes that … He also points out that
…. To support this argument, the author claims that …. At first glance,
the author’s argument seems some what appealing; however, I do not think
that the argument is logically convincing because it does not have sufficient
evidence to prove its conclusion. Here are some reasons why.
以下錯誤選幾個出來寫吧~看題目有什麼錯的就用哪個模版
(以偏概全)
One problem with this argument is that the evidence that the author
provides is insufficient to support the conclusion from it. One example is
rarely sufficient to establish general conclusion. Unless the author can
show that the A1 is representative of all A, the conclusion that …. is
completely unwarranted. In fact, in face of the limited evidence, it is
fallacious to draw any conclusion at all.
(錯誤類比)
The other problem with the argument is faulty analogy. The author does
not realize that A is fundamentally different from B. It is logical for a
to take the measure, such as …. Through this measure, A produces more profit
than ever before. As for another industry, B may be better off staying with
the original measure. There is no doubt that there is no relationship between
A and B.
(過份簡單)
The other problem with the argument is that the author does not take
into consideration other factors involved in determining which store is
profitable. A’s success could be the result of …., thereby …. Moreover,
there might be …. Without examining other factors involved in the success
of A, the author concludes that the dramatic growth of A’s business is based
solely on the factor that … Evidently, attributing the success of A to only
one factor weakens the argument.
(統計數字有問題)
The argument seems to make attractive claim, but its persuasive force is
seriously weakened by misinterpretation of the statistics presented here.
That is, the statistics in the study may be misleading because … is not
specified. Besides, the credibility of the study cited in the argument is in
doubt. If a reliable institution such as Gallop conducted the study, the
argument is more convincing.
(因果關係有誤post ergo propter hoc)
The post hoc fallacy makes the argument invalid. The author assumes that
because one event follows another in time, the first event causes the
second(post ergo propter hoc). In other words, he mistakes a temporal
connection for a casual connection. That conclusion is a matter of
coincidence, not cause and effect. That is, there is no proof of a
direct-cause relationship between A and B. Many other factors such as …
could cause the same effect.
(無關之推論 gratuitous assumption)
The author falsely depends on gratuitous assumption that …. However,
no evidences are stated in the argument to support this assumption. In fact,
this is necessarily the case. For example, it is more likely that ….
Therefore, this argument is unwarranted without ruling out such possibility.
結論
In conclusion, the argument is based on an (oversimplified) analysis of
(the problem A currently faces). As it stands, the reasoning does not
constitute a well-developed statement in favor of the recommendation.
To strengthen the argument, the author should deliberate on more aspects
regarding the problem as establishing the conclusion that (原題結論).
重點是 模版一定要背的滾瓜爛熟 一定要舉例
最好英文練快點 一看到題目就先把模版打上去
可以先打好第一段和最後一段
中間的理由再一段一段的補上去
我就是打完三個理由後 發現還剩十分鐘（因為模版背太熟 打很快）
所以補了第四個個理由 也許就是這樣才拿到比較高的分數吧~
祝福大家作文個個高分啊~
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 218.34.215.168
※ 編輯: ATO 來自: 218.34.215.168 (12/27 21:56)