Re: [國中] 求救...關代I, who........

[outofdejavu (Isolation)]

※ 引述《Debbymona (花蓮真是好山好水好好玩!)》之銘言：
:         I, who ___ your son, is going to do this for you.
                               --
                               ??????
:       請問 動詞是 am還是is呢?
:       如果以I =who的觀念來解 是否選am
:       如果以who是子句的主詞來看是否選is
:       麻煩各位大大開釋  謝謝

以下分兩部份，第一部份是用法書的解說，第二部份是論壇意見

Part I.

Practical English Usage, 3rd ed., by Michael Swan
section 498.12

 agreement of person

 Most relative clauses have third-person reference; I who ...,
 you who ... and we who ... are unusual, though they sometimes
 occur in formal style.

 [Irrelevant Examples]

 A different kind of first- and second-person reference is commom
 in the relative clauses of cleft sentences. However, the verb is
 usually thrid-person, especially in an informal style.

  It's me that's responsible for the organisation.
  (More formal: It is I who am responsible...)

  ---------

section 131.2

  It is I who ...; It is me who ...

  When an emphasised subject is a pronoun, there are two possibilities.

  - It is I who am responsible. (formal)
    It is me that's/who's responsible. (informal)

  To avoid being either too formal or too informal in this case, we
  could say, for example,
    I'm the person/the one who's responsible.

-----------------------------------------------------------

Part II

1.
http://www.usingenglish.com/forum/ask-teacher/67169-concord-2.html

Ronbee (母語人士，論壇的Moderator之一) 認為這種說法 (It is I who...) 很不自然


2.
www.englishforums.com/English/ItsYouWhoIsAreAnsweringMe/dcwdz/post.htm#262772

CalifJim (論壇的moderator之一，他的回覆都很有水準)

引述相關部份，其他請自己看

Taking I am tired as the base sentence, the four cleft versions which
are possible are:

It is I who am tired.  (Nominative, number, person)
It is I who is tired.  (Nominative, number)
It is me who am tired. (Objective, number, person)
It is me who is tired. (Objective, number)

 [...]

My understanding, right or wrong, is that the most formal and academic
usage requires the It is I who am pattern, i.e., nominative case and
both number and person agreement.
Some people argue that I who is is fine.  I don't think anyone argues
in favor of me who am.  My impression is that, informally in conversation,
me who is might be used.

 [...]

Where I live, hardly anybody uses the forms shown above very much.
We prefer to express the same meaning with the following paradigm:

I'm the one who's tired.
You're the one who's tired.
He's/She's the one who's tired.
We're the ones who are tired.
You're the ones who are tired.
They're the ones who are tired.

3. http://www.english-test.net/forum/ftopic12178.html
提問者問 It is I who was/is ...
Mister Micawber 並沒有說這樣子寫是大錯特錯
（└母語人士，在日本教英文的 EFL 老師）

4. http://www.englishforums.com/English/ItIsIWhoItIsYouWho/wdzm/post.htm

CalifJim: "It is I who am ..." is the more conservative form,
          "...I who is ..." being more modern.

僅予參考

--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 220.134.53.250
推 smalloneR:好詳細> <
推 sunflowerya:很棒的整理
推 Lyon9:不過o大 我好奇的是son後面的逗點是? 有任何意義嗎?
→ Lyon9:第一個逗點是非限定修飾 那第二個呢?
→ outofdejavu:在句中的非限定子句前後都要擺逗號啊~
→ outofdejavu:參見　下面的「限定、非限定子句-Part I」
→ outofdejavu:在句尾的非限定子句才只有一個逗號
→ outofdejavu:                                (即子句前面)
※ 編輯: outofdejavu     來自: 220.134.53.250       (12/29 20:17)