推 ym45:可是產量增加 不多雇用人 這樣不會忙不過來嗎? 05/27 11:46
※ 引述《djnospam (DJ)》之銘言：
: ※ 引述《pisces35 (2007了)》之銘言：
: .....
: : _________ our production figures improve in the near future,
: : we foreseee having to hire more people between now and July.
: .....
: : (C) Unless
: : (D) Because
: : 答案給的是(C) 我想知道為什麼選(D)不行
: : 語意上覺得(C)很怪 文法上 Because不也能當連接詞嗎？
: 推 chiya666:unless是可以當做條件連接詞 但是是反意的 語意並不通
: → chiya666:如果下一句是寫we foresee no need to hire...unless就通
: How can you be so sure? There're many factors affecting a company's decision
: in hiring people; one of them can be that the company sees no big change in
: their current "saturated" market (hence see no big improvements in "current"
: production figures) and wants to further expand their market to create new
: market shares. To do so, they need new hires.
: If the production figures do improve (say, next quarter), then there's no
: "urgent" need in hiring people (to expand their market). Of course they can
: still hire people for other reasons, or let go some of the people, but
: that's just not the issure here.
: "Because", on the other hand, is simply grammatically impossible in this
: case, so it can't be the answer.
說實在的 我對這題的第一印象就是C
我知道選C絕對沒錯
就如同你說的
because後面加個statement 而unless後面可以加個帶有預測意味的句子
可是我左看右看
還是覺得這樣會使句子不太合理耶
或許是我完全沒有商業經營的概念吧
我總認為銷售數字沒增加 就一定代表無法再雇用新的人員
所以 我還蠻贊同題目變成 If...., we foresee no need to hire...
我可以理解你提出的“多雇用人以增加開拓市場“
可是 多雇人不是增加經營成本嗎？
如果銷售量不好 不是代表公司利潤會下降
那多雇用人員 不是更會減少利潤嗎？
抱歉 我實在不太懂這種商業的邏輯
有強者可以為我解惑一下嗎？
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 82.36.233.147