※ 引述《luciferii (路西瓜)》之銘言：
: 一整塊回
: 首先，我個人對「專題研究」和「專題研討」在中文上是區分的很開的
: 前者就是就專題來作傳授，也讓學生進行研究，後者在課堂上幾乎都是報告和討論
: 所以純作專題的課程，我不認為有任何原因應該翻成 seminar。
: 但是很多人喜歡混用那也隨在個人，畢竟中文也沒人在作這種規定。
Oh, so you're saying, native speakers are wrong?
: 中文裏「研討會」不代表就一定是 Conference那種大會，
: 大家都不用作研究功課就來聊天。
大家不用做功課就來『聊天』？『聊天』？
What the heck?!
Have you ever actually been to any conferece or seminar?
Unless you don't mind losing face (or showing people your
intellectual naivete), you keep your mouth shut if you're
not prepared or know nothing about what's under discussion.
To be able to effectively participate in a seminar (or a conference,
for that matter), you have to be prepared.
I just received a conference concepts paper from the Peace and
Conflict Society (Trudeau Centre, University of Toronto), asking
its delegates who will be participating in the case studies seminars
to carefully read the paper and be prepared to discuss the issues.
: 在課程上的 seminar 指的就是專題研討，你要不要加上那個「會」字也是隨便你
: 本來meeting就是一種會。
You're contradicting yourself. You just "corrected" me on this
issue earlier.
Besides, you need to stop abusing the words and start paying
attention to the fluidity of language.
: 你提到的貴校seminar課程如果我說錯請糾正我
: 上課形式為先分組研究後，並定期提供研究結果出來溝通互相討論，
: 討論是上課方式的主體
: 每次的上課其實就是一次 seminar 研討(會)，所以這是 seminar 跟純專題的差別
: 純屬獨立/團體研究，作期中期末簡報後交報告的專題課程會稱之為 seminar 嗎？
.....。(sorry but I'm losing my patience)
In six words: you got it wrong, entirely, again.
Why are you so bogged down in these [minute] distinctions
which are even the case?
--
"Politics is the skilled use of blunt objects,"
-Lester B. Pearson
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 74.98.239.53
※ 編輯: finavir 來自: 74.98.239.53 (02/01 23:55)
※ 編輯: finavir 來自: 74.98.239.53 (02/02 00:07)