──────────────────────────────────────
[必]工 作 量： 約4000英字(word顯示3972)
[必]工作報酬：4800元
[必]涉及語言：英譯中(對不起原本英譯英打錯了)
[必]所屬領域：工業工程
[必]文件類型：期刊
[必]截 稿 日：07/05
[必]應徵期限：06/27
[必]聯絡方式：站內信給手機聯絡
[必]付費方式：訂金800，翻譯完成後2天內付清
─────────────────────────────────────
[選]工作要求：專有名詞可以以原文呈現，但勿過度使用翻譯軟體
Abstract
Problem: This study evaluated common scaffold safety practices in
construction. Method: A 150-point checklist was used to evaluate
supported scaffold safety practices at 113 scaffolds in nine areas of the
eastern United States. Results: Thirty-six scaffolds (31.9%) were either in
danger of collapse or were missing planking, guardrails, or adequate access.
There was a strong statistical correlation between structural flaws
and fall protection hazards, and between proper scaffold safety practice and
(a) competent persons with scaffold safety training, (b) use of
separate scaffold erection contractors, and (c) scaffolds that were not
simple frame types. A slightly weaker correlation was found with union
status of the scaffold erector, and no correlation was found with geography,
site size, number of scaffold users, and trade working on the scaffold.
Discussion: Recommendations are made for safer scaffold practice, including a
simple 4-factor scaffold inspection method. Impact on
Industry: Implementation of the 4-factor method could result in a
cost-effective way to identify unsafe scaffolds.
D 2004 National Safety Council and Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.[選]參考段落:
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 106.104.43.223
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/translator/M.1403493040.A.64D.html
※ 編輯: elewis (106.104.43.223), 06/23/2014 11:11:08
※ 編輯: elewis (106.104.43.223), 06/23/2014 15:18:06
※ 編輯: elewis (106.104.43.223), 06/23/2014 15:18:41