Re: [新聞] 楊泮池：開學術倫理課、引進軟體圖片判讀

[ACE520 (ASE)]

給你參考一下,時任中山大學校長(現任科技部長)任內的兩個案例
國外期刊專家都拿不到資料,原來有被質疑的論文可以不給原始raw data
供人檢視調查

Lessons Learned : 高高舉起,輕輕放下(舞弊不會出事)


First case:
Author : Meng-Che Wu
Assessment of Applying SSSC to Power Market for Carbon Trading

Link:
http://etd.lib.nsysu.edu.tw/ETD-db/ETD-search/view_etd?URN=etd-0626111-171029
https://imgur.com/a/70lJ2



Author: : Kai-Hung Lu
Assessment of Power Market for Carbon Trading by Modified Particle Swarm
Optimization

Link:
http://docdro.id/HavLohO (Non-edited Manuscript)
http://www.iaeng.org/publication/IMECS2012/IMECS2012_pp1047-1051.pdf


教育部調查兩個月回覆

有關您來信陳情國立中山大學電機系博士班呂姓學生於2012年發表之研討會論文疑似違反
學術倫理情事乙案，
本部業轉請國立中山大學查明，經該校依相關程序查復說明如下：
一、呂生目前就讀該校電機系博士班，台端所陳內容與其博士論文無涉。
二、大學非屬營利組織，其研究計畫成果可做為畢業論文，亦可用來投稿成會議論文，
    或再精進投稿為期刊論文，之間並無衝突；該領域電力界最頂尖IEEE期刊，論文需於
    會議先發表，才能進入期刊挑選，會議及期刊論文完全相同，近期才分開，此係論文發表相關期程
    與「國立中山大學在學學生學術倫理規範暨違反學術倫理案件處理要點」第2條第5項
規定無涉。
三、研究生參與研究計畫之研究成果，其成果列名與否有其慣例，如大型或跨領域計畫成
員規模較大，
    依慣例會以教授列名，非民眾所述二人以上之共同研究成果據為己有，
    而大型計畫雖然基本上著作權共有，但計畫成果仍可由教授依其權責使用，
    其列名、應用及得否使用於畢業論文仍屬主持教授之裁量權。
四、違反學術倫理案件之判定應嚴謹慎重，台端之陳情，該校已妥慎檢討，
    該生指導教授亦再度陳明無違反學術倫理之情事，特此說明。

    敬祝健康快樂教育部敬復


IMECS回覆

Dear Sir/Madam,

After investigating this case with view points from both parties, it seems
to us that this is an internal case of how to split the work credits among
the team members of the same laboratory. As it seems that this is an
internal affair involving one single laboratory, it would be better if you
can direct your complaint to the head of the laboratory directly. Of if one
would like, one may send the complaint to the head of the department
supervising that laboratory. This is because only the head may keep the
records of the individual works/contributions of each team member of the
laboratory. After their official decision, we are more than happy to follow
their decision.

We are looking forward to your understanding because we do not have the
legal power to order laboratory to hand internal personal data to us before
of privacy issues concerned.

Should you have any enquiry, please feel free to contact us.

Best regards,
Anna Lee
Assistant Secretary
International Association of Engineers (IAENG)



Second case:

1.Author:李元輝(Yuan-hui Li)
A Study for Price-Based Unit Commitment with Carbon

Link:
http://goo.gl/LXV3PY

Abstract:
In this thesis, the Hybrid Genetic Algorithm-Ant Colony Optimization (GACO)
approach is presented to solve the unit commitment problem (UC),
and comparison with the results obtained using literature methods.
Then this thesis applied the ability of the Genetic Algorithm (GA) operated
after Ant Colony Optimization (ACO) can promote the ACO efficiency.
The objective of GA is to improve the searching quality of ants by optimizing
themselves to generate a better result,
because the ants produced randomly by pheromone process are not necessary
better.

This method can not only enhance the neighborhood search, but can also search
the optimum solution quickly to advance convergence.
The other objective of this thesis is to investigate an influence of emission
constraints on generation scheduling.
The motivation for this objective comes from the efforts to reduce negative
trends in a climate change.
In this market structure, the independent power producers have to deal with
several complex issues arising from uncertainties in spot market prices,
and technical constraints which need to be considered while scheduling
generation and trading for the next day.

In addition to finding dispatch and unit commitment decisions while
maximizing its profit,
their scheduling models should include trading decisions like spot-market buy
and sell.
The model proposed in this thesis build on the combined carbon finance and
spot market formulation,
and help generators in deciding on when these commitments could be beneficial.



2.Author: Ting-Chia Ou
A Study for Price-Based Unit Commitment with Carbon Trading by DI&C simulation

Link:
http://goo.gl/NCcszw



Abstract:
In this paper, the Hybrid Genetic Algorithm-Ant Colony Optimization (GACO)
approach is presented to solve the unit commitment problem,
and comparison with the results obtained using literature methods by
nuclear-grade Digital Instrumentation and Control (DI&C) simulation.
Then this paper applied the ability of the Genetic Algorithm (GA) operated
after Ant Colony Optimization (ACO) can promote the ACO efficiency.
The objective of GA is to improve the searching quality of ants by optimizing
themselves to generate a better result,
because the ants produced randomly by pheromone process are not necessary
better.

This method can not only enhance the neighborhood search, but can also search
the optimum solution quickly to advance convergence.
The other objective of this paper is to investigate an influence of emission
constraints on generation scheduling.
The motivation for this objective comes from the efforts to reduce negative
trends in a climate change.
In this market structure, the nuclear power plants (NPPs) and independent
power producers (IPPs) have to deal with several complex issues arising from
uncertainties in spot market prices,
and technical constraints which need to be considered while scheduling
generation and trading for the next day.

In addition to finding dispatch and unit commitment decisions while
maximizing its profit,
their scheduling models should include trading decisions like spot-market buy
and sell.
The model proposed in this paper build on the combined carbon finance and
spot market formulation,
and help generators in deciding on when these commitments could be beneficial.



引述IEEE的規定
http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/plagiarism.html


IEEE defines plagiarism as the reuse of someone else's prior processes,
results, or words without explicitly acknowledging the original author and
source.
It is important for all IEEE authors to recognize that plagiarism in any form,
at any level, is unacceptable and is considered a serious breach of
professional conduct, with potentially severe ethical and legal consequences.



IEEE IPR Specialist 回覆

We are unable to download the following paper:
Author : Yuan-hui Li
A Study for Price-Based Unit Commitment with Carbon

http://etd.lib.nsysu.edu.tw/ETD-db/ETD-search-c/view_etd?URN=etd-0701109-225434

Could you please send us a copy?

Best regards
Tony
---------------------------------------------------
Anthony VenGraitis, IPR Specialist
IEEE Intellectual Property Rights Office
445 Hoes Lane
Piscataway, NJ  08854
Phone:  [phone]
Fax:  [phone]
Email: [email protected]
Web:  http://www.ieee.org/copyright

IEEE. Advancing Technology for Humanity

--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 179.43.168.45
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/AfterPhD/M.1479715844.A.419.html
推 Shilia: 謝謝回覆。在看到 "Will it help if Journal ask people
→ Shilia: to submit the "un-cut" film? From this example,
→ Shilia: requiring original film (which already modified by cut
→ Shilia: and paste) does not really prevent someone do this
→ Shilia: kind of things." 的 Pubpeer 回覆時，大概就心裡有數真的
→ Shilia: 話都 CCC 在講，說要跑去再對著 editor 氣呼呼罵說你是眼
→ Shilia: 睛比我更大顆嗎好像也不太對，因為應該是要去罵 CCC 那個
→ Shilia: 超扯的修圖唬爛女王才對。但是台大這案子跟文中的案例不同
→ Shilia: 的地方在於郭明良有同意提供所有被質疑的論文疑點的原始檔
→ Shilia: 所以 CCC 就算很聰明地都是自己跟期刊編輯偷偷溝通，調查
→ Shilia: 此案的特別委員會同樣有權力要求 CCC 交出所有跟期刊編輯
→ Shilia: 溝通同意讓她 "勘誤" 的信件往來紀錄，如同文中的案例。因
→ Shilia: 為要讓其他期刊編輯們知道和討論以後到底要如何對付這種做
→ Shilia: 假手法粗糙低劣廉價到已經是現代一般研究人員難以置信的地
→ Shilia: 步、但這些人在台灣生醫學術界卻都被視為是研究能量極高的
→ Shilia: 明日之星，怎麼想都很難跟外國人解釋這種他們以為要是窮瘋
→ Shilia: 了的實驗室才可能發生的造假謬誤在台灣居然是拿到非常大筆
→ Shilia: 經費的實驗室"們"慣用的手法。請認真注意我說的話，國外期
→ Shilia: 刊編輯或許這一回無可奈何只能接受 CCC 鬼扯，但是絕不代
→ Shilia: 表他們都沒發現到 Pubpeer 上現在越來越多的關於郭明良研
→ Shilia: 究團隊的文章都有同樣的疑點，而且已經逐漸往人在美國不在
推 moondark92: 注意到還是得裝傻阿,否則就是承認期刊審查過程品質低
→ Shilia: 台灣的洪明奇院士那兒燒過去了。台大這回成立的特別委員會
→ moondark92: 劣,就像小學有種題目叫做改錯字,然後從reviewer到編輯
→ moondark92: 竟然都沒看出這種低劣粗糙的修圖手法...
→ Shilia: 裡頭號稱包含三位中研院院士在內，這回的調查結果是連美國
→ Shilia: 都在等著看(就講了再放任CCC到處亂講話絕對雪上加霜)，因
推 moondark92: 就像選舉多數第一任做不好還是能選上第二任,選民不願
→ Shilia: 為台灣在國際生醫學術圈上的 "信任" 已經被 CCC 那一團實
→ moondark92: 意承認自己所選非人...編輯當然傾向選擇相信只是誤置
→ Shilia: 在有夠誇張的傢伙把 quota 全都消耗殆盡了!@#$%
推 moondark92: 可以自己辦一個期刊,叫做"生醫抓漏",供各國做倫理教材
推 darksaber: 幾年前一個案例，現任學校:該案件為當事人在前任職學
→ darksaber: 校發生，敝校不做處理
→ saltlake: 樓上 趁這波熱潮可以再提起
推 st12231: 除了論文問題，一堆萬年助理教授沒被fire的問題，科技部
→ st12231: 還有校方有沒有想過要處理？
→ alaric: 萬年助理教授肯定不需要為論文作假.
推 moonchaser: 一堆廢物教授不敢檢討自己
→ ACE520: 一份結果可以拿來當碩士論文,博士投稿期刊,
→ ACE520: 教授申請科技部計畫結案報告,堪稱物盡其用的典範
推 Shilia: Retraction Watch 在宣布郭明良 2016NBC 確實被撤稿的消息
→ Shilia: 時很好心地順便幫忙鞭了郭明良楊泮池一下。咱們的科技部和
→ Shilia: 教育部還有台大成立的特別委員會請加油！
→ Shilia: https://goo.gl/s4H9VH
→ marugucci: 都沒人注意到金山分院院長...她"貢獻"了甚麼???
→ marugucci: http://www.js.ntuh.gov.tw/Page.aspx?id=203
噓 MartianIT: 台大耳鼻喉科號稱只收當過兵的醫網隊員 譚的巴庫是?
推 MasonT: 這串出包的, 除了楊pc, 好像都是碩或博班才來台大洗學歷
→ MasonT: 的
推 moonchaser: 一堆學術敗類，垃圾學者，王八蛋教授
→ goodday06: 目前看來楊涉入不深  主要一脈相傳的郭蘇張查問題較大
推 JSFERRO: 我猜這四人到最後只會有一人過關沒事: 那位可以在公開場
→ JSFERRO: 合叫楊P "爺", "楊爺" 的那一位。
推 Shilia: 喔，這個我一點都不擔心耶，說實話這還是我第一次知道台大
→ Shilia: 工會原來人氣可以這麼旺。CCC十年拿走國科會/科技部四千七
→ Shilia: 百萬經費，這個就連台大醫院許多一級主管都難以望其項背的
→ Shilia: 數字原來是這麼地令人憤怒，沒立委報出來我都還沒發現哩！
→ Shilia: (真心希望這陣子凝聚起來的工會小朋友們以後要繼續一直手
→ Shilia: 牽手感情好下去，這回連署每個人多認識六個朋友就好了）
推 JSFERRO: 楊P畢竟非第一或通訊作者。我們大家就來等等看，在多篇
→ JSFERRO: 文章都有掛名，且還有三篇是第一作者的指標性人物3C，可
→ JSFERRO: 以喊楊P"爺"的3C，會不會被砍。
推 Shilia: 欸好啊，我還沒在 ptt 上跟人打賭過，所以我也還不知道到
→ Shilia: 底要怎麼看自己有多少 p 幣和賭輸的話要怎麼轉 p 幣給別人
→ Shilia: 不然結果出來的時候，如果你還記得，就寫信來討債吧
→ Shilia: 不過說實話是我其實不太想再去想CCC的鬧劇了，"妳的作品
→ Shilia: 會像妳的人", 我覺得我最近的產出挺糟糕的... ><!
※ 編輯: ACE520 (173.245.67.163), 11/28/2016 18:39:11