Re: Can Atheism Support Ethical Absolutes?

[xiaoa (不事生產)]

首先, 我不懂, 為什麼要每個帳號發一篇文章

Tiunn, sitifan, Chengheong 是同一個人

※ 引述《Chengheong (Hohlolang)》之銘言：
: http://www.patheos.com/blogs/rogereolson/2014/07/can-atheism-support-ethical-a
: bsolutes-is-ethics-without-absolutes-enough/?utm_source=SilverpopMailing&utm_m
: edium=email&utm_campaign=rogereolson_072214UTC020741_daily&utm_content=&spMail
: ingID=46521540&spUserID=MTAwNjQyMjkxNDM4S0&spJobID=482863094&spReportId=NDgyOD
: YzMDk0S0
幫縮
http://ppt.cc/sm~o


然後, 其實我沒有什麼要說的(除了第一句話)

不過還是隨口說一說

基督教的道德只是冠上上帝之名, 就自認是高格調

事實上猶太教系的法律都已經過時得不能再過時了, 而且還有一堆暴力的刑法

這上帝實在是高尚


然後又要提我的簽名檔

這是在Assassin's Creed的短片動畫裡, Ezio對妻子sofia解釋 the creed 的意義

To say that nothing is true, is to realize that the foundations of society
are fragile, and that we must be the shepherds of our own civilization. To
say that everything is permitted, is to understand that we are the architects
of our actions, and that we must live with their consequences, whether
glorious or tragic

我翻譯:
說 nothing is true
是要我們理解這社會的基石是脆弱的, 我們必須成為我們的文明的牧師(牧羊人)
說 everything is permitted
是我們要明白我們是我們的行為的設計者, 我們必須自己面對對它(行為)造成的結果,
不論結果是榮耀或悲劇

我會提這個, 是因為其中提到 shepherd, 及 解釋 everything is permitted

shepherd有基督教典故, 也是牧師被稱為"牧師"的由來

而解釋 everything is permitted 的意義, 則是回應原文中提到的這句話

--
Nothing is true, everything is permitted -- the Assassin's Creed

--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 203.106.156.197
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Atheism/M.1406049498.A.BC5.html
推 neohippie: 1If "nothing is true" then there should be no creed
→ neohippie: That's a logical fallacy.
→ neohippie: Secondly, are you sure that you are the"architect"
→ neohippie: Of your own actions?
→ neohippie: Because you are thus claiming that
→ neohippie: you have absolute control of your own fate
→ neohippie: Anyone with any level of humility would realize
→ neohippie: that your claim is delusional
→ neohippie: And you would rather believe a video game as truth
→ neohippie: rather than something that has stood for 2000 years