Re: [閒聊] 為何有捕逸就可以不算自責分？

[daniel955377 (安納罕鄉民)]

※ 引述《monine ()》之銘言：
: 黃子鵬今天掉了兩分
: 不過卻因為中間有林泓育的捕逸
: 所以不算自責分
: 但是他之後還是被敲了安打
: 至少還是有一分自責分
: 中職紀錄組標準是不是太寬鬆了

根據英文維基百科好像還是要算自責分的吧?!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earned_run

A batter or runner advances one or more bases on an error or passed ball (but
not a wild pitch) and scores on a play that would otherwise not have provided
the opportunity to score.
While the inning is still being played, the second and last scenario can
cause a temporary situation where a run has already scored, but its
earned/unearned status is not yet certain. Under the last circumstance, for
example, with two outs, a runner on third base scores on a passed ball. For
the time being, the run is unearned since the runner should still be at
third. If the batter strikes out to end the inning, it will stay that way. If
the batter gets a base hit, which would have scored the runner anyway, the
run now becomes earned.

這邊的舉例是說2出局，三壘跑者透過捕逸回來得分，

當下是不算自責分，再看後面打擊狀況作出決定；

但如果跑者得分後打者打出安打，最後還是得算自責分。

今天的狀況完全就是該算自責分吧?!當下的打者陳子豪後來就安打了

--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 220.136.47.57
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1556897401.A.78B.html
推 fupm: PB是失誤
捕逸是不算失誤
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Passed_ball
Passed balls and wild pitches are considered to be part of the act of
pitching rather than fielding. Thus they are kept as separate statistics and
are not recorded as errors.
※ 編輯: daniel955377 (220.136.47.57), 05/03/2019 23:32:49
推 leegogo: 狀況好像不太一樣喔 今天捕逸是上二壘 原本是在一壘
→ leegogo: 跟案例中原本跑者在三壘 所以安打一定會得分 不一樣
→ daniel955377: 當時是一三壘，至少三壘要算自責分的
→ daniel955377: 跟樓下2篇文章一樣 一壘那分應該不算 三壘算
→ leegogo: 喔喔
→ leegogo: 對耶
推 Duke200: 至少也要1責失才對 因為捕逸前 林書逸已經在三壘
→ daniel955377: 不過聯盟play by play寫"捕手失誤"
→ leegogo: 那應該要1責失
→ daniel955377: "捕手失誤，三壘跑者回到本壘，一壘跑者上到二壘。"
推 maxechia: 聯盟文轉品質不太穩定 我猜事後也不會更改 希望聯盟能
→ maxechia: 打我臉
→ Duke200: 投書聯盟XD 或叫展元去問