› 看板 Cubs 關於我們 聯絡資訊
作者Zamned (扎姆德)
看板Cubs
標題Re: Re: Fw: [情報] Keith Law版2015百大新秀&各
時間Sat Jan 31 01:01:17 2015
KLaw曾的報告 The Cubs paid Taiwanese RHP Jen-Ho Tseng last July for $1.625 million, a dubious investment to begin with given the track record of Taiwanese arms, but one that looks even more questionable now given how ordinary his stuff and arm speed are. Note: Of the five Taiwanese pitchers who signed for the highest bonuses with MLB clubs as amateurs, three blew out their arms at least once after signing, one hurt his shoulder and was done after a single season, and the last, Ching-Lung Lo, lost 5 to 7 mph off his fastball without suffering a catastrophic arm injury. Taiwanese teenagers pitch far more than their U.S.-born counterparts, and throw more breaking stuff, so it's not terribly surprising that their track record here isn't very good. Tseng threw Friday and was 89-92 with little life, flashing an 89-90 mph sinker as well that was probably the better weapon for him. He threw two breaking balls, a pretty but slow curveball with two-plane break but very soft rotation at 73-76 mph and a short slider at 84-85 that moved like a cutter without the benefit of cutter velocity. His arm wasn't quick at all, and at 6-foot-1 and 210 pounds, he doesn't offer any kind of projection. Like Zastryzny, Tseng might have a little more in the tank once we get into the regular season, but I couldn't write him up as a future starter. ----- Sent from JPTT on my Sony C6902. -- やっ..........！！！！！！止めろペイモンこの野郎～～～～～～っ 地獄でいきなり聖書なんえ 読み上げやがってえ~~~~~~~~~っ！！殺すえおっ！！ -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.251.254.104 ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Cubs/M.1422637285.A.CC0.html ※ 編輯: Zamned (59.115.130.61), 01/31/2015 07:47:42
推 tony123839: 英文不好只能勉強看個六分懂,很多細節看不太懂... 02/01 14:33
推 tony123839: 不過Law不提他投很好的變速球反而提到滑球?? 02/01 14:37
推 JustinIdiot: 他說滑球看起來像卡特 但沒有卡特該有的速度優勢 02/01 15:58
→ JustinIdiot: 另外他覺得曾沒變法變成先發… 02/01 15:59
推 tony123839: 那邊大概看得懂 納悶的點是不提優點反而只提缺點..... 02/02 00:56
→ tony123839: 目前應該還是普遍相信曾能在MLB當個先發投手才對... 02/02 00:57
推 Aroyo: 優點在sinker阿 02/02 02:52
推 nickyang: 曾本來就不是Keith會喜歡的型，能上榜還滿意外的 02/02 08:47
→ nickyang: 現在沒有普遍相信他可以先發，多半對直球跟身材有疑問 02/02 08:49
推 s9527206: 太久沒看球探報告，原來曾的評價比我印象中低很多... 02/02 12:08
推 nickyang: Keith給的其實沒有差其他家太多，曾的upside是中段 02/03 07:18
→ nickyang: 比較可能後段或牛棚，其實跟陳偉殷本來的projection 02/03 07:19
→ nickyang: 差不太多，陳的評價低嗎？一點也不 02/03 07:20
→ nickyang: 大聯盟就是這麼強啊！ 02/03 07:20
→ Zamned: 身材的問題是大概定型了，缺少成長空間。滑球老問題了，變 02/03 13:16
→ Zamned: 速球一直再練習，KLaw可能剛好沒看到吧。KLaw這模板沒什麼 02/03 13:16
→ Zamned: 問題，反正投手新秀養成牛本來就很正常。 02/03 13:16
推 tony123839: 因為曾的變速球理論上應該是他目前最優秀的變化球種 02/04 13:39
→ tony123839: 所以看到Law連提都沒提到就覺得很奇怪... 02/04 13:39
→ tony123839: 倒是養成牛方面，記得之前不是有人拿黑田來比?? 02/04 13:40
→ tony123839: 雖然小弟非專業，不過畢竟好幾次看過他的投球實力 02/04 13:40
→ tony123839: 對於他評價只有這樣還是讓我滿訝異的 02/04 13:41
→ tony123839: 記得之前不知道看到哪個球探報告至少還能當個4.5號SP 02/04 13:41
→ tony123839: 又或者是我記錯了..... 02/04 13:42
推 nickyang: 比較可能是中後段沒錯啊，不會有人講低階球員至少如何 02/04 14:14
→ nickyang: 黑田那是模板，模板是長得順利變那樣 02/04 14:15
→ nickyang: 投球實力很強也沒錯，但大聯盟更強呀！ 02/04 14:15
→ nickyang: 可以對付日職明星隊的球員連輪值都進不去，這就是大聯盟 02/04 14:16
→ nickyang: 非職業比賽可以有末段輪值支援就是神一般的存在了 02/04 14:17
→ Zamned: 每個球探報告都有不同的看法 02/04 20:57
→ Zamned: 對KLaw來說 就當他是個沒有球速且速球品質普通 02/04 20:58
→ Zamned: 唯一亮點是曲球的右投手。 02/04 20:58
→ Zamned: 實際狀況真如他的觀察狀況那般 這樣去牛棚真的不冤枉 02/04 20:59
→ Zamned: 但是KLaw的問題就是他要負責太多小聯盟球員了 02/04 20:59
→ Zamned: 而且他又不像John Sickels願意去參考各方意見 02/04 21:00
→ Zamned: 作人G8、決策團隊小、實際的觀察不足都可能讓他的評價失真 02/04 21:03
→ Zamned: (不過，他是真的很厲害就是了) 02/04 21:03
→ Zamned: 所以這份報告不喜歡曾仁和不是天塌下來 02/04 21:05
→ Zamned: 你知道James Shields還是小聯盟新秀時最高的排名只有 02/04 21:05
→ Zamned: 在BA 光芒TOP12還是13的名次嗎？ 02/04 21:06
→ Zamned: 但是那又如何？真正重要的還是球隊內部的看法 02/04 21:08
→ Zamned: David Kaplan說小熊在追求James Shields 02/05 12:13
→ Zamned: 是給紅鳥抬價還是真心想買啊? 02/05 12:13
→ Zamned: 如果James Shields夠便宜，合約長度合理也不是不能考慮啦 02/05 12:14