看板 Diary 關於我們 聯絡資訊
you know what, we need to be expert in every field , to be an expert is the best way to live good in this society. maybe you want to be an software engineer, maybe you want to be an hardware engineer, maybe you want to be an staff engineer in your field interpretation wasnt actually very accurate. This has wide implications for anyone trying to develop a skill and expertise, the up to that point. Therefore, if one wanted to become one of the best in that people who were performing at a world-class level, such as In his book Outliers: The Story of Success, Malcolm Gladwell affirmed whether in the arts, business, sports, or any other field.musicians, artists, or sportspeople, had practiced for approximately 10,000 hours However, according to inc.com, recently, the authors behind the original study on which Gladwell based his figures claimed that his world, all he / she had to do was to also practice for 10,000 hours. says, highlighted in their new book Peak: Secrets From the New Science of Expertise, added Nick Skillicorn for inc.com.music academy in Berlin. It stated that the most practice by their 20th birthday. That paper would go on to become a major part of the scientific literature on expert performers, but only In 1993, Anders Ericsson, Ralf Krampe, and Clemens Tesch-Rmer published the results of a study on a group of violin students in a son and co-author Robert Pool wanted to clarify what the science actually attracted mainstream attention after Outliers was published. Recently, Ericsaccomplished students had put in an average of 10,000 hours of BY ROMANITA OPREA Mar 204 min read In his book Outliers: The Story of Success, Malcolm Gladwell affirmed that people who were performing at a world-class level, such as musicians, artists, or sportspeople, had practiced for approximately 10,000 hours up to that point. Therefore, if one wanted to become one of the best in the world, all he / she had to do was to also practice for 10,000 hours. However, according to inc.com, recently, the authors behind the original study on which Gladwell based his figures claimed that his interpretation wasnt actually very accurate. This has wide implications for anyone trying to develop a skill and expertise, whether in the arts, business, sports, or any other field. In 1993, Anders Ericsson, Ralf Krampe, and Clemens Tesch-Rmer published the results of a study on a group of violin students in a music academy in Berlin. It stated that the most accomplished students had put in an average of 10,000 hours of practice by their 20th birthday. That paper would go on to become a major part of the scientific literature on expert performers, but only attracted mainstream attention after Outliers was published. Recently, Ericsson and co-author Robert Pool wanted to clarify what the science actually says, highlighted in their new book Peak: Secrets From the New Science of Expertise, added Nick Skillicorn for inc.com. As Business Insider shows, Harvard prof and Emotional Intelligence author Daniel Goleman said the 10,000 hour was only half true, while a group of psychologists have rejected the rule outright. Within that study, there was no magic number for greatness. 10,000 hours was not actually a number of hours reached, but an average of the time elites spent practicing. Some practiced for much less than 10,000 hours. Others for over 25,000 hours. Additionally, Gladwell failed to adequately distinguish between the quantity of hours spent practicing, and the quality of that practice. This misses a huge portion of Ericssons findings, and is the reason why Tim Ferriss scoffs at Gladwells 10,000 hour rule in this video, yeah , I will keep learning it , keep doing , yeah, We all need to be keep practiceto be an expert. yeah , keep faith. -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 61.227.176.183 (臺灣) ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Diary/M.1594426377.A.866.html