推 Tenka: Sometime it is the people, 03/08 13:27
→ Tenka: who no one imagines anything of, 03/08 13:27
→ Tenka: who do the things that no one can imagine. 03/08 13:28
推 Rebroff: 那為什麼第二句最後要加OF? 我被這個OF搞混了... 03/08 18:38
→ daniel0424: 對啊 不太懂 第二個who的意義 03/08 20:20
→ erilinda: not imagine/think anything of sth. = to not think of 03/08 20:23
→ erilinda: (something) as being important or unusual 03/08 20:23
→ erilinda: 不過我覺得這個句型應該算cleft+adj cl.啦 把第二個who 03/08 20:30
→ erilinda: 改成that應該比較明顯？ 03/08 20:30
→ erilinda: It is + 強調部份 + that+ 其餘部份的強調句型 03/08 20:31
→ erilinda: 再把the people當先行詞插入adj子句修飾the people 03/08 20:32
→ erilinda: 嗯…想了一下應該先adj子句再cleft才對 原句:The people 03/08 20:34
→ erilinda: who no one imagines anything of do the things that 03/08 20:34
→ erilinda: no one can imagine. 把the people...of當強調部份 03/08 20:35
→ erilinda: 因為有兩個that所以把原本cleft的that改成who 03/08 20:36
推 Rebroff: 是不是作者有點錯把think of 弄成 imagine of呀? 03/08 21:38
→ Rebroff: imagine 後面是不加OF的吧? 而且WHO關代後面也不加OF... 03/08 21:38
→ Rebroff: 我是這樣想, 就會想通, 其實那OF根本多的... 03/08 21:38
→ Rebroff: 不知道對不對 03/08 21:39
→ dunchee: Sometime->Sometimes ;;"of"因為anything的關係(anything 03/08 22:18
→ dunchee: of ...) 不是"imagine of"，所以這部份沒問題 03/08 22:18
→ dunchee: 這裡刻意用imagine是為了和後頭的imagine前後呼應 03/08 22:19
→ dunchee: 第一個who原本應該是whom(anything of-> of的受詞)，但是 03/08 22:19
→ dunchee: 現代用法這樣子很尋常(特別是像這樣子間隔很遠的情況) 03/08 22:20
→ dunchee: 真的要"很機車"的話:Sometimes it is the people of whom 03/08 22:20
→ dunchee: ...(of不放子句尾) 第一個who(whom)子句是尋常的關係 03/08 22:21
→ dunchee: 句: Sometimes it is (..這樣子的特定..)人 (我稍微混用 03/08 22:21
→ dunchee: 中文表達習慣。幫助鄉民理解用) 03/08 22:21
→ dunchee: 第二個who子句是cleft sentence: Sometimes it is (..這 03/08 22:22
→ dunchee: 樣子的特定..)人 who do the things that no one can ima 03/08 22:22
→ dunchee: gine. 用以特別強調 "能做出xxxx 的「就是」(..這樣子的 03/08 22:23
→ dunchee: 特定..)人 03/08 22:23
→ dunchee: cleft sentences句型裡頭可以用who: It is ..(人).. who 03/08 22:23
→ dunchee: ... (還有其它的) 03/08 22:23
→ dunchee: It is Bob who .... 03/08 22:24
推 l10nel: 指人時,who/that都可用,不是因為會有兩個that才例外改who. 03/08 22:26
推 l10nel: of不是多餘的，這imagine sth of sb和think sth of sb的of 03/09 00:17
→ l10nel: 是同一個意思，你可以去想想它的意思。 03/09 00:19