推 IcecreamHsu: 這邊的to V 不單純只是spend on it, 有以便、為了 04/23 17:49
→ IcecreamHsu: 的意思 04/23 17:49
→ funjp: in order to的概念 04/23 18:45
→ blue5566: 這樣不管用Ving或to V都說的通了 04/23 18:50
→ stukpe: 說的通，但意思不一樣。 04/23 20:31
→ blue5566: 那這樣選擇題怎麼挑? 04/23 21:28
推 ms43: I think the Taiwanese teacher just wrote his quiz too fa 04/23 23:17
→ ms43: st that he straight misused an infinitive for a gerund 04/23 23:17
→ blue5566: It's an important exam so it must be right. 04/23 23:48
→ dunchee: 你不需要挑。學測這種考試有英文母語(在大學任教)的老師 04/23 23:49
→ dunchee: 驗題，所以不會出現Ving,to V同時出現的選項考題。這也是 04/23 23:50
→ dunchee: 為什麼原題目不是在考選擇to help或是helping。to help只 04/23 23:50
→ dunchee: 是單純的題幹內容 04/23 23:50
→ dunchee: 倒是一般坊間的由"不懂"的人出題/抄題的題目會出現，這時 04/23 23:51
→ dunchee: 候就看你是要應付考試--順著出題人/你的老師的意思來答題 04/23 23:51
→ dunchee: ，還是要"學"英文這語言 04/23 23:51
→ dunchee: 換成helping的話，nytimes.com的搜尋結果稍微少一些 (不 04/23 23:51
→ dunchee: 過Google Books的例子倒是變多) 04/23 23:51
→ blue5566: 不太懂. 所以兩者都對嗎? 我記得考試都是把兩者併列 04/24 00:06
→ blue5566: 要挑Ving 所以學校老師不懂英文亂出題? 04/24 00:07
推 ms43: To mr. dun her: 04/24 08:24
→ ms43: Dunchee that is 04/24 08:25
→ ms43: There are native English speaking faculties in my univer 04/24 08:26
→ ms43: sity 04/24 08:26
→ ms43: which 04/24 08:27
→ ms43: doesn't guarantee authenticity of usage of the targeted 04/24 08:28
→ ms43: language 04/24 08:28
→ ms43: what I mean is 04/24 08:28
推 ms43: existence of foreigner censorship of test quizzes is mor 04/24 08:31
→ ms43: e a matter of formality than conclusion of genuineness o 04/24 08:31
→ ms43: f grammar 04/24 08:31
※ ostracize:轉錄至看板 Teacher 12/12 15:14