→ softseaweed: give前面一定要有to 07/14 12:50
推 Chengheong: are often forced TO give 07/14 13:01
謝謝。
請問原句子錯了嗎?
附上出處:
http://goo.gl/nwIYYv
→ kaifrankwind: 是的錯了(有沒有注意到下幾段有句forced to work?) 07/14 21:58
謝謝!清楚了!
※ 編輯: eebarry (165.91.13.68), 07/14/2015 22:17:55
推 Ikebe3120: Yes, in this case, the "to" has been omitted by acc 07/16 09:58
→ Ikebe3120: ident. I think the dropping of the “to” in this c 07/16 09:58
→ Ikebe3120: ase has to do with the spoken language, where the / 07/16 09:58
→ Ikebe3120: u/ in “to” is reduced to schwa, and the preceding 07/16 09:58
→ Ikebe3120: -ed combines with the “t” of “to.” 07/16 09:58