推 fakeID: 不是,是同位語。 01/31 00:50
推 vincentman: 同位語。這裡的have當完全及物動詞 01/31 08:22
推 softsong: 受詞補語如果移除,句意不完整。同位語移除文法仍正確 01/31 08:49
→ softsong: I made him.顯然句意不完整。I made him a duelist. 01/31 08:50
→ softsong: 我使他成為鬥士。有了鬥士句意才完整,鬥士是受詞補語 01/31 08:51
→ softsong: There is solid evidence.文法正確但卻不知證據內容為何 01/31 08:51
→ softsong: 故用同位語說明:...evidence that smoking causes 01/31 08:52
→ softsong: lung cancer. 吸煙導致肺炎就是證據的內容,兩者相等 01/31 08:52
→ softsong: 更正:肺癌 01/31 08:53