[請益] will/is going to/ is being

[stayhome (嗨)]

最近在這個文法上遇到了不少挫折

以下題目是錯的刪掉

It's not a deep, but it _______ a scar
a. will leave b. is going to leave c. is leaving

”錯的是c“

a和b在在解答裡對此題都有相似的意思

以下是我自己分析的差別 不知道合不合理

will leave 的意思因該是帶點預測

is going to leave 應該是比will leave 較肯定點

is leaving 和 is going to leave 照理講意思應該一樣啊
都是比較肯定的

但為何答案卻寫is leaving 不成立？


--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 223.137.14.244
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Eng-Class/M.1457864440.A.944.html
→ dashihito: 只有來去動詞進行式才能表未來式吧？這邊leave v.留下
→ dashihito: ；而不是來去動詞的leave v.離開。
Present continuous
we can often use either the present contunuous or be going to with a
similar meaning to talk about planned future .
The present continuous indicates that we have a firm intention or have
made a definite decition to do something , although this may not already
be arranged  會不會是因為這不是人“主動”去做的關係
※ 編輯: stayhome (223.137.14.244), 03/13/2016 19:36:07
→ dashihito: 覺得無關。畢竟「颱風這周末會來」你也是可以說：
→ dashihito: The typhoon is coming this weekend.
go 和come 是例外
※ 編輯: stayhome (223.137.14.244), 03/13/2016 20:20:15
→ dashihito: 所以才說通常「來去動詞」可以進行式表未來式，而來去
→ dashihito: 動詞不僅有go和come，arrive, return這種表位移的都是
→ dashihito: leave也有可能是，如果當「離開」解的話，可是你這邊的
→ dashihito: leave很明顯就是指「留下」疤痕。
推 jumbotest: 題目的邏輯應該是ab是未來式，c是現在進行式，如此而已
"are you seeing the doctor again next week?"="are you going to see...""
"i am not asking Tom to the party"="i am not going to ask.."
以上都不是來去動詞喔～
※ 編輯: stayhome (223.137.14.244), 03/13/2016 21:01:44
※ 編輯: stayhome (223.137.14.244), 03/13/2016 21:02:34
推 hsheng: be + Ving 表計畫或安排中 的未來
→ dunchee: "to talk about planned future"-> "傷口留疤"不是你一步
→ dunchee: 一步計畫好(事先定好的)的未來(這是自然形成的，和你的"p
→ dunchee: plan(s)"無關)
→ dunchee: It's not a deep cut/It's not deep 你少打一個字/多打一
→ dunchee: 個字
→ dunchee: 看樣子是出自Advanced Grammar in Use. 接下來的"However
→ dunchee: "的說明也很重要"... over which we have no control....
→ dunchee: arrange these ..." 等等等等。
→ dunchee: 總之「整個」看(提供到版上)，不要只抓你想要的一小段