推 kangan987: 應該是名詞子句做subject吧~ 前面整句當主詞 03/13 22:38
→ dunchee: "一般來說...嗎？"-> 你接觸的不夠。他講的也是尋常表達/ 03/13 22:44
→ dunchee: 慣用表達 03/13 22:44
→ dunchee: [what you believe] is great work 03/13 22:44
→ dunchee: to do {[what you believe] is great work} 03/13 22:45
→ dunchee: {}裡頭，[]名詞子句，整個當主詞，這是解釋之一。另一種 03/13 22:45
→ dunchee: 解釋是 "what"本身是主詞/名詞，然後[]子句內容是說明什 03/13 22:46
→ dunchee: 麼特定的"what"(相當於... the thing which ... ) 03/13 22:46
→ dunchee: 你接觸的少/沒看過的用法自然不懂。所以才說要多閱讀 03/13 22:46
→ tom91002: you believe是插入語。例如："What you think is the be 03/13 22:47
→ tom91002: st movie this year?"、"What he believed was good to 03/13 22:47
→ tom91002: his health was actually the opposite."。 03/13 22:47
→ dunchee: 比如我前述講的"文法"我是後來才知道的。但是在這之前我 03/13 22:48
→ dunchee: 已經"讀懂了"。懂的意思後回頭配合文法看就很容易上手 03/13 22:48
→ dunchee: 而我看/扯文法是為了在這裡混 03/13 22:48
→ scju: 感謝三位！T大講的應該就是D大說的第二種解釋方式囉。 03/13 23:01
推 Tenka: 插入語只是幫助理解 這不是插入語 通通用插入語來解釋總會 03/14 01:39
→ Tenka: 碰到問題的 看個例句"They are doing what they believe 03/14 01:40
→ Tenka: best for their children." 如果你把they believe當插入語 03/14 01:40
→ Tenka: 遮住不看 整句話就不合文法 03/14 01:41
→ tom91002: 因為你例句是錯的。請問例句出處？ 03/14 02:32
推 tom91002: 抱歉，樓上推文當我沒說。XD 03/14 02:45
推 Tenka: 哈 你沒看過就是錯嗎 笑話 把"what they believe best"丟去 03/14 02:46
→ Tenka: 餵孤狗 你可以找到上萬句例句 03/14 02:46