看板 Eng-Class 關於我們 聯絡資訊
以下三則例子都出自於字典 (1) I'll ask around, see if I can find them a place to stay. (2) Brompton became a fashionable district to live in. (3) The hotel terrace is an ideal place to enjoy a relaxing drink. 想請問: (1) 我們不會說stay a place,而stay in a play 那為什麼a place to stay不必有in? (2) 我們不會說live a district,這裡to live in 又有in,和(1)不同之處在哪? (3) 我覺得應該是... to enjoy ... drink in.才對 為何沒有in? -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.35.36.92 ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Eng-Class/M.1459819565.A.C32.html
kaifrankwind: 也有人講...to live; 也有人講...to stay in 04/05 10:43
kaifrankwind: 有一個文法迷思是句尾不能擺介係詞 也許(1)(3)就是 04/05 10:50
kaifrankwind: 寫的人在乎這點 不過現在已經很多人反對這條規範了 04/05 10:52
wohtp: place好像是特例?我會說 a district to live in, a scene 04/05 22:48
wohtp: to look at, a song to listen to, a task to occupy 04/05 22:48
wohtp: yourself with... 04/05 22:48
wohtp: 但是不會在 a palce to stay 後面加介詞 04/05 22:49
yoson: 似乎是省略了 where 04/06 00:45
kaifrankwind: 要嘛地方名詞接(to V./where S. V.) 要嘛where to V 04/06 01:36
kaifrankwind: 跟省略where無關啦... 04/06 01:37
yoson: 喔喔 我想到其他句型去了 XD 04/06 04:07
yoson: 前面是要說 The hotel terrace is an ideal place 04/06 04:10
yoson: (where) you can enjoy a relaxing drink. 這樣的句子wher 04/06 04:10
yoson: e可以省略 而它本來就不會有in 04/06 04:10