看板 Eng-Class 關於我們 聯絡資訊
While there are many other reasons to explore other battery chemistries, justifying research on other battery chemistries in the name of avoiding the economic issues associated with lithium is misguided; Lithium is plentiful, has little impact on battery cell and pack costs, and is here to stay. 這句話是某篇論文結論最後一點,看不太懂,麻煩幫忙翻譯一下,感激不進~ -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 210.240.248.212 ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Eng-Class/M.1470665941.A.262.html
kaifrankwind: 出於鋰元素的經濟考量(成本高)而去考慮其他種的 08/09 00:22
kaifrankwind: 電池可能性(不同的化學反應)是錯誤的考量 因為鋰元 08/09 00:24
kaifrankwind: 素實際上還很多 不用擔心它變貴 08/09 00:24
rainenyuki: 謝謝您的幫忙~ 08/09 08:00
rainenyuki: 若方便的話,能否解釋一下怎麼翻的?因為跟表面單字 08/09 15:59
rainenyuki: 有點差距 08/09 15:59
Issagn: 意思是:鋰數量多,對電池外殼及包裝成本影響很小, 08/15 15:19
Issagn: 它不會被淘汰. 08/15 15:19