作者scju (QQ)
看板Eng-Class
標題[文法] 空中英語教室批改作文
時間Sat Aug 13 11:47:28 2016
各位好，請教這一期201608空中英語教室批改作文的部分。
#表示編輯認為應刪去
[]表示應加上
How English Has Changed My Life
That is the question. When I was young and naive, teachers and my
parents always told me that English was very important, whether in #the#
normal life or in the future. Thus, I started learning English when I was
just about five #and#[or] six years old. I thought it was tough and boring
at first, but gradually, I found that learning English #is#[was] not that bad,
actually it was quite interesting! Since then, going to language school
became the most exciting thing #in# every single day, and I like[d] my
classmates and teachers so much#,#[.] #t#[T]here #are#[were] also lots of fun
activities, which I always enjoyed a lot. Getting older and more mature,
my class level was getting higher and higher too. Now, I can't say my
English is the best in [the] class, but I can [be] sure that my English is
definitely not poor. Although I #had#[have] stopped going to language school
#anymore# now, #however,# I still read many English articles and magazines,
like SparkNotes, Studio Classroom etc. And I believe, in my future life,
English will truly help me and make me successful.
------
1.That is the question在這裡是什麼意思？（譯：這就是那個問題？）
2.第四行這句：I thought it was tough and boring...it was quite interesting!
架構是A, but B, C
想問的是，我以為連接詞只有：「A 連接詞 B」。
也能寫成：「A 連接詞 B, C」這種形式嗎？所以一個連接詞前後能接到三句，
還可以再加嗎？
3.Getting older and more mature, my class level was getting higher and
higher too.
這句我的理解是，前半部是分詞構句，但這樣前後主詞不就不一致，變成懸吊句了？
When I got older and more mature, my class level was getting higher....
以上請教，謝謝！
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.160.80.132
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Eng-Class/M.1471060051.A.30F.html
※ 編輯: scju (1.160.80.132), 08/13/2016 12:28:46
→ kaifrankwind: 2. 問題不在連接詞後接了兩句 而是BC之間沒有連接詞 08/13 13:57
→ kaifrankwind: 有機會讀到一些英文的"個人"blog等之類稍微輕鬆的語 08/13 13:58
→ kaifrankwind: 境 就會知道當前後兩句感覺關係很緊密連起來很順的 08/13 13:59
→ kaifrankwind: 時候 是可以只接個逗點而沒有連接詞的 這篇讀起來 08/13 14:00
→ kaifrankwind: 確實也不是多嚴肅 應該還OK 08/13 14:01
→ kaifrankwind: 3. 年紀增長接課程程度提高 算理所當然 不會被誤會 08/13 14:05
→ kaifrankwind: 所以可接受 08/13 14:05
推 orfan: 1.開場白的概念!? 演講時放第一句 寫作時倒可有可無 08/13 14:55
→ orfan: 不過較常聽到是here's the Q 有種你要講得主題很重要的樣子 08/13 14:57
→ dunchee: 1. 唯一的解讀是"that"指的是題目。我是覺得這第一句很唐 08/13 20:58
→ dunchee: 突("xxx如何xxx"本身不算是個"question"。如果連"xxx如何 08/13 20:58
→ dunchee: 做"都不知道，那麼之後的也不用寫了。如果是要"質疑/批判 08/13 20:58
→ dunchee: "xxx如何做"，那麼之後的內容也應該是在"xxx如何做"本身) 08/13 20:59
→ dunchee: 我的話會把這句整個刪掉 08/13 20:59
→ dunchee: 2. 既然是教/批改作文，這算是錯誤。看樣子他們忽略了 08/13 20:59
→ dunchee: 幾個更改方法: 分號: .... that bad; actually it was .. 08/13 21:00
→ dunchee: 直接斷開: ... that bad. Actually it was .... 08/13 21:00
→ dunchee: dash(*1): .... that bad--actually it was ... 08/13 21:00
→ dunchee: explanations in a ... 08/13 21:00
→ dunchee: 3. 你對。同前(既然...錯誤) 08/13 21:01
→ scju: 感謝各位！ 08/14 23:25