[文法] Wiktionary的解釋

[scju (QQ)]

大家好，請問一下

wiktionary對how come的用法解釋如下：

"How come" differs from "why" in that the word order of the question is the
same as that of a statement. Compare:

You didn't leave. (statement)
How come you didn't leave?
Why didn't you leave?



意思大概懂，說How come雖是疑問句，但詞序是直述句的排列方式。

想問的是，「...in that the word order of the question...」
為何要多用一個that，照理說直接寫in the word order of the question
不就可以了嗎？

加上that的話，我的理解是the word order of the question變成that的同位語，但感覺
好像多一舉。難道是要和後面那個that對襯嗎？

請教一下，謝謝！

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/how_come#English


--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 36.226.128.215
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Eng-Class/M.1477892368.A.C53.html
→ wohtp: 你有沒有發現後面有個is？
→ wohtp: 後面整個子句都是所謂「不一樣的地方」，所以子句前要冠個
→ wohtp: that
推 Tenka: in that = because
好的，理解了。感謝二位！

"How come" differs from "why" --->到這裡已經是完整的句子

in that the word order of the question is the same as that of a statement.
--->所以這裡用in that...，可以有兩種理解方式：

1.that the word order of the question is the same as that of a statement.
為that引導名詞子句，作為介系詞in的受詞，當名詞用。

2.in that = because當作連接詞，連接另一個子句，也就是
the word order of the question is the same as that of a statement

※ 編輯: scju (36.226.128.215), 10/31/2016 14:33:22