看板 Eng-Class 關於我們 聯絡資訊
請問, 看到分詞構句怎麼判斷是從關係或對等子句減化而來 The girl, playing the piano, did not know it. 1 The girl, who was playing the piano, did not know it. 2 Playing the piano, the girl did not know it. 謝謝 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 218.187.98.130 ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Eng-Class/M.1479825833.A.1FB.html
sunny1991225: 第二個句子怎麼樣都不會簡化成原PO問的那個句子吧 11/22 22:56
sunny1991225: 第二個句子要變成分構也會是"The girl was playing 11/22 23:07
※ 編輯: snob2 (218.187.98.130), 11/22/2016 23:10:05
sunny1991225: the piano, not knowing it." 11/22 23:08
sunny1991225: 你現在新改出來的這個句子跟原本的句子意思則不一樣 11/22 23:12
sunny1991225: 因為通常把分構放在主句前,讀者會覺得有一個隱藏的 11/22 23:13
sunny1991225: 連接詞,可能是解釋the girl did not know it的原因 11/22 23:15
sunny1991225: (像是because she was playing piano) 11/22 23:15
sunny1991225: ,但原本的句子The girl, playing the piano, did 11/22 23:15
sunny1991225: not know it並不會給讀者這種理解。句子中那個分詞 11/22 23:16
sunny1991225: 片語playing the piano就只是插在句子中表達 11/22 23:17
sunny1991225: 主詞(the girl)的某種狀態 11/22 23:17
sunny1991225: 而且Playing the piano, the girl did not know it. 11/22 23:20
sunny1991225: 不太像是從對等子句改過來的,因為對等子句改過來的 11/22 23:22
sunny1991225: 分構通常會放在主句後面...... 11/22 23:22
snob2: 主要是想問看到分詞構句怎麼判斷是不是從關係子句減化來的 11/23 08:41
snob2: 例句只是舉例, 謝謝 11/23 08:42