看板 Eng-Class 關於我們 聯絡資訊
大家好,請教一下。 在Longman Dictionary of Common Errors中,看到這樣的說明: reference ×: In reference to your letter of 6th September, I am pleased to confirm that the books have now arrived. √: With reference to your letter of 6th September, I am pleased to confirm that the books have now arrived. ‧ ‧ ‧ with reference to sth (NOT in ): 'With reference to your recent article in "Amateur Gardening", there are one or two questions that I would like to ask.' 附圖http://i.imgur.com/CanoOUD.jpg 然而,在牛津及朗文詞典卻都有看到"in/with reference to"的寫法。 因此不知該如何解讀? 難道是原本只有"with reference to",後來才加上"in"的用法? 謝謝! -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 36.225.51.11 ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Eng-Class/M.1489756382.A.77E.html ※ 編輯: scju (114.32.32.215), 03/17/2017 23:10:50
kaifrankwind: 現在知名度高的"字典"多半是descriptivist 03/18 00:24
kaifrankwind: guide什麼的才會判斷什麼什麼用法是"錯的" "要避免" 03/18 00:25
謝謝! ※ 編輯: scju (36.225.51.11), 03/18/2017 10:44:06
dunchee: dunchee.blogspot.com/2016/09/tmp2.html 03/20 01:41