[文法] 被動式的時態

[jeff42713 (翁傑夫)]

大家好
想請問一題被動語態文法題

In Peckham yesterday a shop assistant
(1) was forced (force) to hand over ?500 after (2) being threatened
(threaten) by a man with a knife. The man escaped in a car which (3) had been
stolen (steal) earlier in the day.
The car (4) was later found (later find) in a car park where it (5) had been a
bandoned (abandon) by the thief. A man (6) has been arrested (arrest) in conne
ction with the robbery and (7) is still being question (still question) by the
 police.

我想請問第7格為何不能使用

still have been questioned

謝謝~


--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 42.77.198.127
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Eng-Class/M.1535547424.A.C03.html
→ dunchee: 最簡單的解釋是"have been questioned"的動作已經結束(
→ dunchee: (question(動)不是持續性質的動詞--警方已經問完就是問完
→ dunchee: 了-> 搶匪被問完了，就沒有一直繼續被問下去 )。而"still
→ dunchee: "是表達動作持續意思的副詞，兩者意思互相牴觸，所以這不
→ dunchee: 是答案
→ dunchee: is still being question->questioned
了解 太感謝你了！
不好意思能不能順便問第6格
嫌犯既然還在被監禁中
為何不能使用being arrested
謝謝 ！
※ 編輯: jeff42713 (42.77.95.90), 08/29/2018 22:34:12
推 timmy999: 文意吧 他這邊不是說那個人已經被逮捕
→ timmy999: 因為跟搶劫案有關
推 timmy999: 他這邊的and應該是然後的意思吧
→ wohtp: arrest做動詞用是逮捕不是監禁。所以being arrested是正在
→ wohtp: 被抓，可能警察正把他壓在地上還在扭打沒上好手銬。
→ jeff42713: 了解 謝謝回覆