[請益] 文法問題求助

[greenishch (greenishch)]

在書上看到一句例句如下
One of Chomsky's achievements has been to make plausible the claim that
linguistics is scientific in the more interesting sense that it can provide no
t
only explicit descriptions but also explanations for the classification.

有幾個疑問:
(1) 我對於be to + v.的理解是做為「未來式」使用或用來表示「條件句的先決條件」，
    但此處搭配完成式has been to make，實在百思不解例句要表達的意思orz

(2) make plausible the claim that......
    v. + adj. + n.這樣的倒裝用法是否只能限定在使役動詞使用呢?

先感謝大大賜教~~

--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 36.235.133.52 (臺灣)
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Eng-Class/M.1660000089.A.87A.html
推 exempt: 跟時態無關,單純就是不定詞(to+VR)當主詞補語,補充說明
→ exempt: one of chomsky's achievements
推 exempt: https://i.imgur.com/xc5I3rQ.png
推 exempt: 一般情況下是make+受詞+形容詞,但是這裡的受詞the claim
→ exempt: that....classfication 實在太長了,所以才倒裝。
→ exempt: 這種用法不限於動詞make
→ exempt: 另外,make可以當使役動詞,但是這裡的make應該不算使役動詞
了解了～謝謝e大！
※ 編輯: greenishch (36.235.133.52 臺灣), 08/09/2022 21:16:19