Re: [新聞] 《刺胳針》投書掀熱議 疾管署急澄清 台大

[dj720c (dj720c)]

看到住院病患死亡率58.2%

正常人都會覺得這數據有問題

那段時期哪來這麼高的死亡率大家都不知道???

然後現在才被這兩個醫生發現???






其實這篇文章有註記58.2%這個數據的來源，來自於底下的文章

這是來自於林口長庚110名插管病患的研究

110病患中，有46例(佔41.8%)屬於Alpha變異株

64例(佔58.2%)屬於Omicron變異株




所以58.2%這數字並不是死亡率

這是很明顯的引用錯誤




Comparison of Clinical Characteristics and Mortality Outcome in Critical
COVID-19 Patients Infected with Alpha and Omicron Variants

This study included 110 critical patients with COVID-19 who required
intubation and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Among these patients, 46
(41.8%) required intensive care during Alpha predominance period and 64
(58.2%) during the Omicron predominance period. The Alpha group had a higher
body mass index, had a longer ICU stay, and included more patients with acute
respiratory distress syndrome, and the Omicron group included more active
smokers, had more comorbidities, had worse initial laboratory data (including
higher white blood cell counts, prothrombin time [PT], activated partial
prothrombin time, blood urine nitrogen levels, and creatine levels), and had
higher in-hospital mortality rates (40.6% vs 15.2%, p = 0.004). The
independent risk factors for in-hospital mortality, were Charlson Comorbidity
Index (CCI) 3 and higher PT and creatine levels.


--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 36.233.253.24 (臺灣)
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1745684351.A.37F.html
→ Gauss: 說得好。PTT的IF有多少
→ kaky: 不是人家引錯是你自己亂解讀，新聞內容就說
→ kaky: 是住院治療的死亡率
→ kaky: 疾管署跳針兩國死亡率,人家是從醫院收治比較
→ kaky: 疾管署如果要針對論文的話可以比較收治標準
→ TISH12311: 母數加一堆青少年 死亡率就低惹 西西
→ lkkgotyy: 傻鳥只會看自己想看的啦