https://tinyurl.com/4r4w5uph
Without question the justices had skeptical questions for the Solicitor
General. But several Justices seemed skeptical, and even frustrated by Neal
Katyal's presentation. He was polished, but wooden. Far too often, it seemed
like he was giving rehearsed answers, which were not entirely responsive to
the questions that were asked. Katyal may have also misread the room, and
came in far too overconfident after the Solicitor General sat down. This case
is close, but I think that ultimately the tariffs are upheld. I say this as
someone who has not formed a solid opinion on the matter. I really haven't
blogged about the issue, and came into the argument with an open mind.
嘻嘻
媒體都在洗法官拷問政府關稅代表 川普關稅案藥丸
但實地去旁聽完整場辯論的法律教授 卻揭露反對關稅的律師表現也不好
沒有啥很好的準備 差點就被一個licensing fee騙去承認政府可以隨意徵收授權費
中場還被法官偷臭為反而反
看來這下川普關稅穩了 民進洞最難纏的談判代表好自為之吧
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 172.56.2.199 (美國)
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/HatePolitics/M.1762407649.A.F95.html