推 saram: 既然合法,算貪汙嗎?218.173.173.112 03/15 17:09
→ saram: 是違法要法院判決,法院判國務機要費合法貪218.173.173.112 03/15 17:11
→ saram: 汙?218.173.173.112 03/15 17:11
→ saram: 到今天全世界都看到民進黨總統被法院判定218.173.173.112 03/15 17:11
→ saram: 貪瀆,但是國民黨總統有被判貪瀆嗎?請舉例.218.173.173.112 03/15 17:13
→ saram: 舉不出例218.173.173.112 03/15 17:13
→ saram: 是不是?218.173.173.112 03/15 17:13
→ saram: 擁有政權與否,跟貪不貪汙無關.請問台聯有218.173.173.112 03/15 17:14
→ saram: 執政嗎?難道他們貪汙?218.173.173.112 03/15 17:14
→ saram: 如果媒體網路一篇猜測就能替代法院判決,那218.173.173.112 03/15 17:16
→ saram: 法治還有用處嗎?218.173.173.112 03/15 17:16
推 alvany: 樓上s大，所以只能說知法玩法，圖利廠商 39.13.146.190 03/21 11:54
噓 takagimaria: 合法就不叫貪污 61.230.182.71 04/06 09:02
→ saram: 眾口猜疑不能判人罪.到最後唯一能定罪是法 114.40.20.197 04/08 21:01
→ saram: 院.否則國務機要費案阿扁算不算貪? 114.40.20.197 04/08 21:02
→ saram: 慈濟的善款不都以物質等替代品輸出了? 114.40.20.197 04/08 21:04
→ saram: 給急難者還是給廠商? 要搞清楚. 114.40.20.197 04/08 21:05