看板 MLB 關於我們 聯絡資訊
The 2015-16 free agent season’s qualifying offer value has been set at $15.8MM, according to a tweet from Eric Fisher of the Sports Business Journal. That represents an increase, of course, but the rise isn’t nearly as great as it has been in the past. The QO system used a $13.3MM number in its first year, which increased to $14.1MM and then to $15.3MM last fall. The qualifying offer value is determined by averaging the 125 contracts leaguewide that have the highest average annual values. Here’s a quick refresher on how the qualifying offer system works: Teams can offer their departing free agents a one-year deal, at the established price tag, within five days of the conclusion of the World Series. Over the next seven days, players who receive the offer are allowed to talk with other teams and decide whether to take the single-season pact. If they reject it, then draft implications attach: their former team stands to gain a compensation pick in the following year’s draft, while a new signing team must give up their highest non-protected draft choice. There are plenty of other elements of the system, of course, and you can check out this old-but-good overview for more. For an understanding of why the qualifying offer matters so much, read this great explanation of why “ avoiding the qualifying offer” is so important for a free agent’s value. Players traded in mid-season are not eligible to receive a qualifying offer. So, for example, the Royals can make a qualifying offer to Alex Gordon but cannot extend one to Johnny Cueto or Ben Zobrist. And remember: we still have yet to see a player accept a qualifying offer. While several QO-declining players have seemingly experienced market impacts after being saddled with draft compensation, the opportunity to test the open market in search of a multi-year pact has thus far proved compelling. http://goo.gl/PEVSSU 今年的QO是15.8M 原本預估約16M QO實施後還沒有選手接受過 歷年QO 2012 13.3M 2013 14.1M 2014 15.3M -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 61.228.171.204 ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/MLB/M.1444490743.A.1B5.html ※ 編輯: Zuleta (61.228.171.204), 10/10/2015 23:27:01
ocean11: 如果接受了QO簽1年,來年還可以再提QO? 10/10 23:29
chucky: yes 10/10 23:29
cacac: 複數年約才有保障(中職除外) 10/10 23:32
lovemelissa: 好奇一問 今鶯會願意出1580萬的QO給陳? 不是說省錢 10/10 23:33
sam9595: 陳怎麼可能接受...可以簽個60M的誰要15.8M 10/10 23:33
cacac: 當然會,因為陳應該不會簽,選秀權不要白不要。 10/10 23:34
clay102616: 為何會不願意 有選秀權耶 10/10 23:34
Ayukawayen: 又不會接受 沒簽就沒花錢啊 10/10 23:34
nanhu0423: 接受就是簽一年短約風險小 10/10 23:34
※ 編輯: Zuleta (61.228.171.204), 10/10/2015 23:35:47
Zuleta: 金鶯一定會提QO 陳不接受還可以拿選秀權 10/10 23:36
ChrisDavis: 去年才8M大漲價 10/10 23:40
lovemelissa: 所以如果chen接受了 金鶯就一定得付1580萬就對了 10/10 23:40
※ 編輯: Zuleta (61.228.171.204), 10/10/2015 23:42:29
TokyoHard: 15.8感覺接近甜蜜點了,應該會有第一個了吧 10/10 23:43
jo4: 陳接受了金鳥就賺了~ 10/10 23:43
cacac: 我比較好奇今年金鶯會拿幾個選秀權 10/10 23:45
yankees733: 會提QO但陳不會接受的,簽長約才有保障 10/10 23:46
mightymouse: 不太可能接受,平白放棄肥約的機會 10/10 23:47
lovemelissa: 如果金鶯提了 代表他們認可陳有一年領1580萬的實力? 10/10 23:49
ChrisDavis: 不提連選秀權都拿不到跟認可沒什麼關係 10/10 23:52
sam9595: 去年Cuddyer寧可簽2y/21M 也不願1y/15.3M 在山上 10/11 00:08
sam9595: 就知道QO有多麼廉價了 10/11 00:09
tyrone0923: 提QO跟認不認可有時候是兩回事 10/11 00:09
maxspeed150: QO就只是個程序 不提沒選秀權拿 10/11 00:12
maxspeed150: 打的爛的留不留都沒差 打得好的不出更多錢絕對留不住 10/11 00:12
redzero: 明年打的好打不好都不知道能簽長約誰會想只簽1年 10/11 00:16
geneaven: 有心的話早就綁個雙方滿意的約了,選手佛心的話會給老東 10/11 00:16
geneaven: 家破盤價,弄到QO根本就是不想簽2年以上了 10/11 00:17
waterydan: 陳也應該考慮明年陣中主將會留不住...陣容可能更爛... 10/11 00:25
waterydan: 還是趕快逃離金鶯吧... 10/11 00:26
Hachiko: lovemelissa 一年拿15.8M跟平均一年拿15.8M是不同概念 10/11 00:26
TSbb: 逃離金鶯這種搞笑推文還是去棒球版吧 10/11 00:28
lovemelissa: 我懂了 謝謝以上推文指教 10/11 00:47
JessicaA1ba: 陳怎麼可能接受...可以簽個60M的誰要15.8M 10/11 01:20
JessicaA1ba: 隔壁克里夫蘭騎士隊有個叫湯普森的 10/11 01:22
O10lOl01O: 可是瑞凡逃離金鶯就沒有馬車多的神守備了 10/11 01:23
JessicaA1ba: 想要一口氣簽長約拿八十萬,哪看得上QO,就拒絕了 10/11 01:23
JessicaA1ba: 那個湯普森,全聯盟只有兩隊給得起80M給他,他也敢拒 10/11 01:26
JessicaA1ba: 絕QO 10/11 01:26
JessicaA1ba: 同樣來觀Chen,全聯盟給得起60M給他的還不少隊,見鬼 10/11 01:28
JessicaA1ba: 了才會接受QO 10/11 01:28
spurs2120: NBA跟MLB的QO差這麼多也在比。 10/11 02:07
Parhelia: ...NBA的QO只有該名一輪新秀第四年合約的125%而已 10/11 02:23
OoyaoO: 對金鶯來說要不要對Matt Wieters提QO是比較難的問題 10/11 02:24
OoyaoO: 這兩年因傷出賽數大幅下降 他如果選一年約拼一下也不奇怪 10/11 02:26
mrkey: O's誰都可以不要,Chris Davis是一定要留的 10/11 02:37
Loving5566: QO基本上只是保護選秀權的方式,提QO還是可以簽長約 10/11 03:04
Loving5566: 另外,的確金鶯今年的難題是要不要對Wieters提QO 10/11 03:05
Loving5566: CD,Chen鐵定是會提QO的 10/11 03:06
Loving5566: 然後O'Day應該會續約。我是不看好有大動作 10/11 03:08
Loving5566: D'Angelo基本上安於現狀,八成不想提高payroll 10/11 03:09
Loving5566: 另外金鶯可能會追Doug Fister 10/11 03:09
randylee: 去年QQ8m,你的去年是那一年? 10/11 06:49
qozxcv: 今年季中不是被調整下放AAA嗎?應該不會接受QO 10/11 07:06
abacada: 記得沒錯還不是下放AAA 是去A 10/11 07:54
OoyaoO: 陳偉殷很高機會可以簽到52M/4Y以上 不管怎樣也不會接受QO 10/11 08:45
OoyaoO: 跟有沒有下放一點關係也沒有 10/11 08:46
OoyaoO: Chris Davis有可能130M/5Y以上 金鶯最貴球員AJ明年16M 10/11 08:47
OoyaoO: 感覺要留很拼阿 10/11 08:47
OoyaoO: Machado也要開始仲裁了 以他的成績和年紀不快綁進到FA 10/11 08:48
OoyaoO: 八年起跳只是基本而已 金鶯這季末老闆發不發銀彈阿 10/11 08:49
vg175: Machado的經紀人一向反對自己的客戶提前跟母隊簽長約啊 10/11 08:54
vg175: Weaver當年跟天使續長約時Boras氣到不只自己連代表也不派去 10/11 08:55
vg175: 要說服Boras讓Machado簽下去恐怕得端出一筆非常非常可觀的 10/11 08:57
vg175: 數字 依照金鶯老闆的吝嗇程度... 10/11 08:57
mrkey: 比起WY Chen,要取代一個46HR的真的找不到..這不是2001年 10/11 08:58
vg175: 好幾年前老美那邊有不少金鶯迷高興國民轉播合約在MASN手上 10/11 08:58
vg175: 覺得靠這筆收益能好好幫助球隊補強 結果老闆把錢都放口袋裡 10/11 08:59
abc12812: Boras哪有反對提前簽約? Carlos Gonzalez不就提前綁了? 10/11 09:54
abc12812: 基本上Boras就只是忠實執行客戶的意願 只是剛好他大牌 10/11 09:55
abc12812: 客戶多 當然想去FA試身價的情況就多而已 10/11 09:56
eno03: 小陳逃離金鳥吧 根本不尊重 隨便一隊4y50M 10/11 11:01
vg175: 所以落磯不就拿出非常非常可觀的數字了嗎? 別只看第一句啦 10/11 13:00
OoyaoO: Weaver當年續長約是連數字都很佛 而且他說錢夠了就是夠了 10/11 14:25
OoyaoO: MLB還是有人不完全看錢的 10/11 14:25
abc12812: 80M/7y對個MVP候選人來說哪裡可觀了? 10/11 18:35
randylee: 前兩年Machado 有抱怨球隊不願意提早簽約啊! 10/11 18:54
vg175: CarGo那張約破了當時僅滿兩年年資就簽下的延長約總額紀錄 10/11 19:42
vg175: 這樣算不算可觀? 見仁見智 10/11 19:42
OscarJeff: 都還沒開始談哪來什麼尊不尊重 某樓... 10/13 16:01