[閒聊] 合法滑壘的定義

[fountainNess (StevenSouza今年40HR)]

According to MLB Rule 6.01(j), a bona fide slide "occurs when the runner
(1) begins his slide (i.e., makes contact with the ground) before reaching the
base;
(2) is able and attempts to reach the base with his hand or foot;
(3) is able and attempts to remain on the base (except home plate) after
completion of the slide; and
(4) slides within reach of the base without changing his pathway for the
purpose of initiating contact with a fielder."

合法/善意的滑壘＝

要件1:觸壘前開始與地面接觸滑壘

要件2:意圖/能用手或腳觸壘

要件3:意圖/能在滑壘之後留在壘包上（由於本壘碰到就得分，不需要套這個要件）

要件4:沒有變向想跟防守員發生接觸


大部分的時候我們都把焦點放在要件3

只要能留在壘包上就是合法

但是Rizzo很明顯，從線外跑到線內

變向來跟Diaz碰撞


要件4在一壘跑往二壘可能有點模糊，畢竟沒有很明顯的白色壘線

但是三壘往本壘就很明顯了


還是某大大要來解釋一下這條？

--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 122.116.230.44
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/MLB/M.1527733238.A.9A2.html
推 b993040020: 我覺得沒什麼變向欸 他瞄捕手瞄的很準
→ elong: 很明顯的變向啊 原本跑外側 滑壘切內側
推 s638450: 棒球發明國熊說合法就合法
推 mightymouse: Sxxxx:這個play沒有誤判的可能
→ airplanes: 考慮增個TB5吧 防守員視線能預見跑者有意作接觸
→ airplanes: 一般二壘手都能看見可能接觸 Diaz當天連視線都沒法顧及
→ b99202071: 沒用啦 我當時就跟他這麼說他就裝沒看見啊
→ b99202071: 他會跟你說裁判說沒問題就是沒問題
→ b99202071: 然後隔天他褲子內褲就都沒了
推 Zamned: 直接說結論。球員、教練、裁判都不清楚標準
推 Zamned: 看國外媒體人怎麼說的
→ Zamned: Unfortunately, it’s not very clear when viewing it th
→ Zamned: at it is illegal. The players, coaches, managers and e
→ Zamned: ven the umpires aren’t clear on how to interpret and
→ Zamned: enforce these rules. That’s a problem, one that needs
→ Zamned:  to be addressed as quickly as possible. And by contra
→ Zamned: dicting on Tuesday what the umpires determined on Mond
→ Zamned: ay, the league has essentially admitted that to everyo
→ Zamned: ne involved.
推 abc12812: 我直說八 這條的用字是"when" 代表滿足1234點是合法滑壘
→ abc12812: 的充分條件 => 有滿足就合法 (沒滿足未必不合法)
→ abc12812: 所以rizzo沒滿足3 不代表就是不合法