Re: [討論] 李政厚會比吉田正尚強嗎？

[polanco (polanco)]

節錄這篇 https://atmlb.com/3te67bQ

Scouts compare Lee to Masataka Yoshida of the Red Sox, who signed a five-year, $
90 million deal with Boston last offseason. Yoshida was 29 years old when he sig
ned, while Lee is only 25, so it’s not surprising that Lee landed an extra year
 at a slightly higher average annual value. Lee also has an opt-out clause that
he can trigger after four years, allowing him to test free agency again at age 2
9 -- the same age Yoshida was when he signed with Boston.

跟這篇 https://bit.ly/40Uedm1

Because NPB is seen as a higher caliber of league than the KBO and because Yamam
oto is seen as more of a true elite talent, his expected contract will naturally
 be higher than Lee’s, since some scouts aren’t entirely sold on how Lee’s ba
t will translate to much power against MLB pitching.  Some comps have been made
to Masataka Yoshida but with a higher defensive ceiling, even if Lee might not s
tick in center field.  Lee’s platform year was also limited to 86 games due to
season-ending ankle surgery, and while he should be healthy for Spring Training,
 he missed a critical chance to further showcase himself for any doubting evalua
tors.




看起來米國真的有球探拿吉田當李政厚的模板

考量到李的年紀還有守備天花板

拿得比吉田高是不是合理了？




假設李能打得跟去年的吉田一樣，守備也合格

那這張約算值得嗎？
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 42.77.46.91 (臺灣)
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/MLB/M.1702793371.A.7B4.html
※ 編輯: polanco (42.77.46.91 臺灣), 12/17/2023 14:11:09
→ zxc906383: 感覺球探報告不會準
→ EEERRIICC: 個人不看好，但球探當然比較專業
→ EEERRIICC: 但還是 希望他打超出身價
→ b99202071: 球場不同
→ cplusplus426: 如果是能CF的吉田 那約感覺反而小賺
推 Roshiel: 李的模板應該是秋山比較適合
推 Sizemore24: 有另個可能李比較合適的對比球員：Steven Kwan
推 c871111116: Kwan也有聽到別人在講 感覺是比較合理的
→ tyrone0923: Kwan的防守很好耶，李的防守等級有這麼高嗎
→ WasJohnWall: 李的缺點就GB%很高+初速很低
推 Roshiel: GB%高+初速低，不就是高概率水貨嘛？
→ JustinIdiot: 對呀XD
→ JustinIdiot: 除非他真的有像Kwan這麼好的approach啊
推 c871111116: 這樣講起來是不是感覺跟當初金賢洙的風向滿像的啊
推 a2156700: 簽破隊史合約 應該是當成韓國一朗吧
推 Roshiel: 印象中金賢洙很早就被認定守備不行了