[北美] Google intern team match 求協助

[eric1527 (我不想知道阿)]

大家好！我是宋皓翔(Hao Hsiang Song)，今年在芝加哥大學讀CS研究所。

我目前在Google intern team match階段，如果有合適團隊，懇請前輩提拔。

我有兩年Java backend development的經驗，主要開發Restful

services, ORM, batch processing, and both unit and integration testing。

我目前對前後端技術都十分嚮往，希望可以朝microservices designing深入。

這是我的聯絡方式:

  [phone]

  [e-mail]

I am currently pursuing M.S. in Computer Science at University of Chicago.
I believe with two years professional experience in Java backend development
at Live365 and Innova Solutions, I would make a great fit based on:

    * Fast learner
      Learning new technologies on the fly is one of the traits I developed
      from my previous jobs. At Live365, within first two weeks,
      I was able to pick up the REST protocols and commit myself to
      advertisement-server development. Immediately, I adapted Jersey, Guice
      and JUnit frameworks. On top of that, at Innova Solutions, I instantly
      dived into the implementation of backend services with Spring
      frameworks. Particularly, I had solitarily integrated Spring Batch with
      the Document Processing Engine in a master-slave architecture in the
      span of a sprint. The prompt output of mine was recognized by my peers
      and supervisors.

    * Backend experience
      From my two previous positions, I had gained a comprehensive
      understanding in backend engineering. At Live365, I learned to
      leverage lightweight framework such as Jersey for RESTful APIs, Guice
      for dependency injection and Redis for caching. Even, I set out with
      a more continuous delivery aim by approaching Docker container for
      test environments. Innova Solutions, on the other hand, took a more
      consistent approach via Spring frameworks. Particularly, I had the
      pleasure to solitarily integrate Spring Batch with our Document
      Processing Engine in a master-slave architecture.

    * Ownership
      In my role as a software developer, I was responsible for not only the
      delivery, but the quality of my work. From coding styles to unit test
      coverage, Innova Solutions had a stern procedure of code development
      including design reviews, code reviews, unit tests, git merging and
      sonar scans. Additionally, having that commingled with the nature of
      rapid requirement-changes in Agile meant the codes delivered must be
      testable and reusable in the very first place and a strong sense of
      ownership ensued.

=========== CV ===========

Education:

The University of Chicago, Chicago IL   (expected)              12.2018
M.S. in Computer Science

National Taiwan University, Taipei                              01.2014
B.S. in Engineering Science and Ocean Engineering

Skills:

Java, Spring Core, Spring Batch, Jersey REST, Oracle DB, MyBatis ORM, JMS,
Mockito, Maven, Guice DI, JUnit, Redis, HTML, CSS, jQuery, Handlebars.js,
Python, Machine Learning, Algorithms, Data Structures, Haskel
Artificial Intelligence, SQL, React.js

Professional Experience:

Java Developer - Innova Solutions, Taipei                05.2016 - 08.2017
    * Modernized document processing engine that processes 1 million documents
      daily from ground up using Spring Batch, MyBatis ORM, JMS, ActiveMQ,
      Mockito, and Oracle
    * Rotated as representative from Taipei to St. Louis, ensuring
      communications and having 2 sites combined into 1 Scrum team
    * Engineered integration tests with dynamic table creation and data
      autogeneration that inserts and purges data from 15+ tables.
    * Integrated engine with Spring Batch in a master-slave architecture
      so that the master would spin up a number of slaves which dynamically
      listen to MQ for tasks
    * Tailored internal logging utilities that decouple Log4j implementation
      from each projects
    * Awarded 2017 Taiwan Trend Setter among 100+ colleagues

Jr. Java Backend Developer - Live365, Inc., Taipei      08.2015 – 01.2016
    * Developed RESTful services with Oracle, Redis databases, Maven,
      and Guice
    * Performed functional tests with JUnit, and RestAssured
    * Implemented service-layer transaction management


Technical Projects:

Photo Album — frontend project 04.2016
    * Designed responsive web pages by using HTML, CSS, Bootstrap, jQuery,
      and Handlebars.js
    * Supported backend photo upload through Spring Data to MongoDB

Utopian Help, Hackathon 04.2016
    * Delivered prototype backend in 36 hours from designing to implementation
    * Leveraged Jersey framework for RESTful APIs, and Maven for dependency
      management

--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 98.206.160.172
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Oversea_Job/M.1515790471.A.009.html
※ 編輯: eric1527 (98.206.160.172), 01/13/2018 05:26:00
※ 編輯: eric1527 (98.206.160.172), 01/13/2018 05:27:06
※ 編輯: eric1527 (98.206.160.172), 01/13/2018 05:32:02
推 kevin810401: 推一個
→ havanabay: 學弟，兩個建議。1.描述太冗長，尤其第一部份
→ havanabay: 2. 你已經是社會人士了，發正式文件措辭莊重一點
→ havanabay: 「希望」前輩「有機會」「可以提拔一下」這句觀感很差
→ havanabay: Who are you? 為什麼我要「有機會」來「提拔」未知的你
→ wawi2: 我覺得措辭沒什麼問題啊 有人太敏感...
→ havanabay: 人之間networking本來就是「敏感」跟「細節」的事情
→ havanabay: 尤其西方世界更重視這些manner 所以加油，好嗎^_^
→ gus2: 還好吧，真要用人怎麼會在意這種眉角的小事，想太多
推 expiate: 措辭還滿有禮貌的，用來當開頭還可以吧？難不成要說可以
→ expiate: 幫你賺一百萬，性能優化十倍這種你就信？
推 RLCorn: 每個人感受不同吧，但沒惡意或頤氣指使倒還好
→ miluco: 沒有感覺有什麼不禮貌, 二樓太敏感了一點
→ miluco: 如果用英文來翻譯,可以有很多方式寫,但他寫的中文看起來
→ miluco: 很正常,並無不妥
→ miluco: 還有,沒畢業之前,都叫學生,不算真正社會人士
→ miluco: 相對的我還覺得他寫得太禮貌了一點,可以寫"幫忙"就好
→ miluco: 前輩們當然沒有"義務"要"提拔"你,但是他要team match發這
→ miluco: 文就是要請已經在G社的前輩"幫忙",而且應該都是不認識的
推 MAGICMCGRADY: 二樓不知道在嗆啥..你就算要提醒也不用一副要教訓人
→ MAGICMCGRADY: 的口氣,我才想問who are you?你沒有"提拔"別人還是
→ MAGICMCGRADY: 少用這種口氣跟別人說話,基本上會用這種口氣講話我
→ MAGICMCGRADY: 覺得你其實也不太像社會人士,加油,好嗎^_^
謝謝各位指教，我已經稍加修改開頭。正式書信有些生疏，請各位見諒。
※ 編輯: eric1527 (98.206.160.172), 01/14/2018 05:21:55
推 tintinmonkey: 我覺得原文看起來蠻誠懇的啊 沒什麼不妥，真的重視
→ tintinmonkey: 敏感或細節的話，這種措辭的建議會用站內信而不是讓
→ tintinmonkey: 原po難堪或尷尬吧
推 exthrash: 二樓是在嗆啥? 原po措辭明明就很好 第一段長度差不多
推 exthrash: CV是有點太長 可以放在link 想要幫忙的人再點進去看就好
→ exthrash: 二樓才應該要加油 問問自己who are you
推 steve1012: 這篇明明就很正常
推 laba5566: 別理2樓 他大概最近被阿三經理pip ㄏㄏ
→ sorryla: 二樓很有社會人士的樣子阿，愛擺架子的那種
推 Itia: 感覺是東西方求職的差異，在西方（尤其矽谷）謙虛在求職上
→ Itia: 沒有什麼加分，反而是明確列出自己的強項比較會被青睞
→ Itia: 至於fast learner 是每個人都自稱自己是，所以有點雞肋
推 laidon: 2樓大概是覺得太禮貌吧! 但內文可以再縮減一些是真的。
推 poc7667: 覺得二樓太敏感啦
→ raichu312: 2樓在遷怒嗎～
→ PegasusSeiya: 哈哈哈哈!!
→ PegasusSeiya: 我只能說只要沒不禮貌 自然會有相合同好會去match
推 LilacSnow: 二樓說的沒錯；原波用字遣詞可以再自信堅定一點。像什
→ LilacSnow: 麼”I believe”這種寫出來就有點太軟了。加油！
推 fishlinghu: 2樓好老喔 社會人士欸 我們菜逼八嚇都嚇死了 > <
推 rayu: 我來推二樓。忠言一般逆耳，更何況二樓只是就事論事給出建
→ rayu: 議。畢竟米國不吃溫良恭儉讓這套，你是否有自信應對別人的
→ rayu: 質疑也很重要。祝福原 PO 進入合適的團隊迅速累積經驗值～
→ ken1325: 看看矽谷，印度人最愛提拔自己人，再看看2F，台灣人最愛
→ ken1325: 擺架子教訓人，呵呵。
推 LilacSnow: 二樓是好心給建議。真正不想提拔自己人的，連建議都懶
→ LilacSnow: 得給了。二樓好心的列出了這麼多具體的建議卻被酸，那
→ LilacSnow: 之後是不是乾脆就潛水，讓原波自生自滅，在美國職場多
→ LilacSnow: 碰個三年壁？
→ LilacSnow: 這就是以上酸二樓的人想要的結果嗎？
→ LilacSnow: 那以後大家都一起來這取暖互說對方好棒棒這樣就好了
→ gus2: 看你怎麼想，我是覺得為了這幾個詞就一付說教的語氣很要不得
→ gus2: 更別說被六樓講一下就回個加油好嗎啾咪完全沒建設性
→ gus2: 要給建議就好好給，不需要自己站在前輩的角度給學弟指點
→ gus2: 提出你的想法跟原po討論這樣，才是我覺得比較好的方式
→ gus2: 建議本身的內容倒是頗中肯，就是求職者不用把自己擺的比較低
→ miluco: 二樓提的建議只有兩個"1.描述太冗長",這點我相信大部分人
→ miluco: 都認同,第二點"發正式文件措辭莊重一點",我看不出有哪裡
→ miluco: 具體?我在美國職場15年,九成的同事都白皮膚,不要說什麼
→ miluco: manner,外國人一樣有客套禮貌的美德.建議歸建議,二樓的
→ miluco: 語氣,實在沒什麼好認同的,聽起來很嗆,沒有人有義務要幫你
→ miluco: 內推,重點是他寫的中文沒有問題,難道我們念的國文不同?
→ miluco: 不是不認同二樓的就叫酸.
推 LilacSnow: 當我剛要出校園時，對各種建議都是感激涕零的收下，再
→ LilacSnow: 根據自己情況調整。就算不喜歡語氣又怎樣，多感激幾聲
→ LilacSnow: ，對方就會開心的多給建議，這對我只有好處沒有壞處
推 LilacSnow: 有人給建議還去酸，自己堵了條路，那就別想再多學到什
→ LilacSnow: 麼了。一堆酸二樓的人，自己又給了什麼建議？
推 BIGBBB: 二樓完全是老鳥很跩耶
→ BIGBBB: 沒給意見但至少不會硬挑一個毛病來擺高姿態教訓人^^
→ LilacSnow: 你覺得他跩又怎樣？跩的前輩也是有東西可以教。
→ LilacSnow: 教訓也是建議，也能學東西。不過算了，干我什麼事 XD
→ LilacSnow: 你們要酸去酸吧！
→ gus2: 指出不合理也叫酸？如果樓上同意這種態度，是不是也對
→ gus2: 職場霸凌沒有意見，反正前輩怎麼幹譙我就當吃補
→ gus2: 這種硬要分上對下的工作文化不是台灣人常詬病的學長學弟制嗎
→ gus2: 或是鄉民說的相忍為xx(建議、學東西)，我覺得不需要這樣
→ gus2: 完全搞錯分享、建議的本質
推 BIGBBB: 硬要挑毛病=可以學到東西？ 神邏輯
推 sorryla: 教訓也是建議? lol 跟以前權威式的打你是為你好異曲同工
→ sorryla: 你喜歡被人家這種態度"建議"是你的事情，不要要求別人跟
→ sorryla: 你一樣