作者Rust (lang)
看板PC_Shopping
標題[情報] WD SN8100 出現在德國亞馬遜
時間Tue May 6 21:57:07 2025
Despite not being officially announced by Sandisk, the WD Black SN8100 is availa
ble for pre-order at Amazon (Germany) at the equivalent of $225 for the 1TB vari
ant, via momomo_us. With listed reads of 14.9 GB/s, this should be the fastest
consumer PCIe 5.0 SSD, at least if we're talking about on-paper specifications.
Beyond what the Amazon listing offers, technical details, including the specifi
c controller and NAND flash type, remain unknown.
儘管 Sandisk 尚未正式發布,透過 momomo_us 在德國亞馬遜(Amazon Germany)已開放預
購 1TB 款,等值價格為 225 美元。標示讀取速度達 14.9 GB/s,若僅論紙面規格,將成
為最快的消費級 PCIe 5.0 SSD。除了亞馬遜頁面顯示資訊外,其具體採用哪款控制器及 N
AND 快閃記憶體種類尚未可知。
Western Digital's flash-memory business has been handed over to the now-independ
ent Sandisk, following its spin-off from the company. In theory, this should ext
end to Western Digital's acclaimed WD Black lineup, though end-users are unlikel
y to experience any significant changes. The bottom line is that Sandisk will pr
obably be responsible for bringing the SN8100 to market, handling everything fro
m launch to customer support, but it will be marketed with Western Digital's wel
l-known WD label.
Western Digital 的快閃記憶體事業在分拆後已移交給獨立運作的 Sandisk。理論上,這也
包含了知名的 WD Black 系列,不過終端用戶應不會察覺明顯差異。重點是:SN8100 後續
上市及客戶支援等環節,極有可能由 Sandisk 負責,但依舊沿用 Western Digital 的 WD
商標進行行銷。
The SN8100 is the first PCIe 5.0 SSD under the WD Black product line, and is li
sted with impressive read speeds of 14.9 GB/s, beating the best from Samsung, K
ingston, and Crucial, at least if we're going by first-party tests. The SN8100 i
s positioned as a successor to the WD Black SN850X, which was among the fastest
PCIe 4.0 SSDs back in its day.
SN8100 是 WD Black 系列首款採用 PCIe 5.0 規格的 SSD,官方標示讀取速度達 14.9 G
B/s,若依據廠商自家測試,已超越 Samsung、Kingston 與 Crucial 的頂尖產品。此款定
位為 WD Black SN850X 的接班人,當年後者曾是最快的 PCIe 4.0 SSD 之一。
The listing's claim of an average operating power of 7W or less strongly suggest
s the SN8100 employs Silicon Motion's power-efficient SM2508 controller. That be
ing said, Western Digital did show off a prototype 15 GB/s SSD last year at FMS
2024, which leveraged an in-house controller, with comparable power draw. We'l
l know for sure when Sandisk provides a complete technical datasheet. The NAND I
Cs employ a TLC (Triple Level Cell) design with CBA technology, likely sourced f
rom 8th generation (218-layer) NAND jointly developed by Sandisk and Kioxia.
亞馬遜頁面標示平均功耗不超過 7W,極可能代表 SN8100 採用了 Silicon Motion 的高效
能 SM2508 控制器。不過,Western Digital 在 FMS 2024 曾展出過一款讀取達 15 GB/s
的原型機,使用自家控制器,功耗水準也相近。待 Sandisk 公布完整技術資料表後,就能
得到最終答案。 NAND 晶片採用 TLC(三層單元)設計,並結合 CBA 技術,極有可能出自
Sandisk 與 Kioxia 共同開發的第八代 218 層 NAND。
The WD Black SN8100 offers sequential reads and writes of up to 14.9 GB/s and 1
4.0 GB/s, while its random read and write performance is listed at 2,300K IOPS.
According to the leaked numbers, it beats every SSD in sequential tests, but lo
ses to the 9100 Pro in random writes, thanks to Samsung's proprietary Presto con
troller. The SN8100 is said to launch in 1TB to 4TB capacities, but as of writin
g, only the 1TB model is listed for pre-order.
WD Black SN8100 的連續讀寫速度分別最高可達 14.9 GB/s 與 14.0 GB/s,隨機讀寫性
能標示為 2,300K IOPS。根據外洩數據,其在連續測試中擊敗所有同級 SSD,但因 Samsung
獨家 Presto 控制器,隨機寫入速度略輸給 9100 Pro。據稱將推出 1TB 至 4TB 容量,不
過截至目前僅 1TB 款可預購。
In terms of pricing, the 1TB variant is listed at $225 (€199.99), or about 22.5
cents per Gigabyte. This is significantly more expensive than PCIe 4.0 options
, which currently average around 6–7 cents per gigabyte; even less during sales
. Bearing that in mind, German users can pre-order this SSD at Amazon, with deli
veries scheduled to begin on May 30. Hopefully, we will see an official announce
ment by then.
價格方面,1TB 款標示 225 美元(約 199.99 歐元),相當於每 GB 約 22.5 美分。相比
之下,PCIe 4.0 SSD 目前平均僅需 6–7 美分/GB,促銷期間更低。考量到這點,德國地
區用戶可在亞馬遜預購,預計 5 月 30 日開始出貨。希望屆時能看到官方正式發布。
以上即為原文段落與對應中文翻譯。
---
ChatGPT 怎麼翻得爛爛的,
我明明有開思考模式了......
以前 Gen5 SSD 總是會帶給人燒燙燙的印象,
所以板上一直不是很推薦購買,
最近搭載台積電 7nm 等級製程的控制器好像準備推出產品了,
不知道科技能不能征服 Gen5 SSD 的熱量,
讓 Gen5 SSD 進入主流市場。
來源:
https://bit.ly/4k35x5d
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 123.241.91.165 (臺灣)
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/PC_Shopping/M.1746539829.A.BD5.html
推 E7lijah: 熱量只是第二,進主流最大的障礙還是價39.10.56.92 05/06 22:00
→ E7lijah: 格39.10.56.92 05/06 22:00
→ E7lijah: 價格下不來什麼都不用談39.10.56.92 05/06 22:00
→ kisia: gen5的CP值太低了 有感的全是缺點 燙跟貴122.117.101.121 05/06 22:01
※ 編輯: Rust (123.241.91.165 臺灣), 05/06/2025 22:10:05
推 oppoR20: 你要跟他說翻譯成通順的中文 而且我覺得42.73.173.152 05/06 22:14
→ oppoR20: 思考模式常常回答都比較謹慎42.73.173.152 05/06 22:14
→ oppoR20: 而且你的來源呢 42.73.173.152 05/06 22:14
→ Rust: 啊居然忘了123.241.91.165 05/06 22:15
※ 編輯: Rust (123.241.91.165 臺灣), 05/06/2025 22:18:01
推 Fezico: 大型違建蓋起來118.231.208.105 05/06 22:21
→ wahaha99: 思考模式不一定會翻比較好喔 118.169.24.125 05/06 22:34
推 jhjhs33504: 所以價格算WD的鍋? 1.162.124.196 05/06 22:51
推 tsairay: 6nm主控其實已經算解決熱的問題了125.229.103.220 05/06 23:04
→ tsairay: 只是價格,同容量下比G4貴將近一倍125.229.103.220 05/06 23:05
→ tsairay: 幾乎每個牌子都是這樣,所以實在很不划算125.229.103.220 05/06 23:05
推 dos01: 速度更快 溫度應該只會更高210.209.164.247 05/06 23:05
→ dos01: 而且這個速度對大多數使用者來說幾乎無感210.209.164.247 05/06 23:06
→ dos01: 不會像當初HDD到SSD的那種飛越性進展210.209.164.247 05/06 23:06
推 tsairay: 2TB的G4約4.5k吧,G5要9k多125.229.103.220 05/06 23:07
→ tsairay: 9k多已經可以買4TB的G4了125.229.103.220 05/06 23:07
推 aasssdddd: 跑測試屌打4.0但實測遊戲讀取快沒幾秒 36.229.47.248 05/06 23:25
→ dickey2: 6000?? 219.85.203.230 05/07 00:31
推 blue0627: 幾秒是很大差距了耶,真不建議gen5嗎 218.35.143.137 05/07 00:50
推 Clavius: 不是影音編輯,沒差那幾秒,也沒有HDD變 114.33.203.175 05/07 01:15
→ Clavius: SSD時的巨大差異。除非熱跟價錢改善。 114.33.203.175 05/07 01:15
→ Clavius: 對遊戲來說價差換大容量好xD 114.33.203.175 05/07 01:16
→ z030060374: 晶體越小越燙啊 無解 42.70.169.12 05/07 01:23
推 dos01: 幾秒的差距是指載入時間的那種 不是FPS210.209.164.247 05/07 01:30
→ dos01: 像是LOL 開打前的載入差個幾秒...根本沒有210.209.164.247 05/07 01:31
→ dos01: 意義 就算你先跑好 還是要等其他人啊210.209.164.247 05/07 01:31
→ dos01: 就算是自己玩3A 換圖的載入時間也是起來倒210.209.164.247 05/07 01:32
→ dos01: 杯水 別說差幾秒 就算先跑好 人沒回來 也是210.209.164.247 05/07 01:32
→ dos01: 放在那而已210.209.164.247 05/07 01:32
推 crow0801: 想當年SSD剛出來時 也是很多類似樓上的115.165.193.241 05/07 08:13
→ crow0801: 言論115.165.193.241 05/07 08:13
推 chyou2003: 0.1秒跟0.2秒體感應該沒差…223.137.106.105 05/07 09:02
→ chyou2003: 專業使用者取向吧223.137.106.105 05/07 09:02
推 jasn4560: 到底收山了沒啊 不是說轉給SANDISK 39.10.57.32 05/07 09:03
→ jasn4560: 怎麼還在出SSD 39.10.57.32 05/07 09:03
→ jasn4560: 3A大概是HDD1分半變成SATA20秒 39.10.57.32 05/07 09:05
→ jasn4560: SATA20秒變成GEN4 10秒 39.10.57.32 05/07 09:05
→ jasn4560: 20變成10的有感程度都很低了 39.10.57.32 05/07 09:05
→ jasn4560: 你從10秒要再往下....能多有感 39.10.57.32 05/07 09:05
→ jasn4560: 讓你多塞一口雞腿的時間? 39.10.57.32 05/07 09:05
推 SecondRun: 翻譯不需要思考 你叫他思考通常會更爛 219.70.128.120 05/07 09:29
→ sincere77: 顯卡、CPU都到頂了再考慮Gen5吧111.248.239.225 05/07 10:01
推 balius: Gen3->4->5一直都有人在講這個話題啊...每 61.220.247.172 05/07 10:03
→ balius: 次最高傳輸速度往上翻倍,看看有幾個人實 61.220.247.172 05/07 10:04
→ balius: 際體感也快一倍? 61.220.247.172 05/07 10:04
推 tsairay: 廠商自己也想撈而已,一條G5和G4 SSD 202.39.11.150 05/07 11:00
→ tsairay: 顆粒相差無幾,最大就主控不同 202.39.11.150 05/07 11:01
→ tsairay: 價格卻幾乎翻倍了 202.39.11.150 05/07 11:01
→ tsairay: 主控的成本不相信有差那麼多 202.39.11.150 05/07 11:01
推 jhjhs33504: 100G光纖的環境有用啊 怎會沒用? 1.162.124.196 05/07 14:32
→ jhjhs33504: 能跑跟不能的差距 很明顯吧 1.162.124.196 05/07 14:34