推 piglauhk: 這中譯是不是有哪裡怪怪的 03/02 16:55
→ jjeffrey1015: 怎麼說呢？還請前輩多指教 03/02 21:42
→ jjeffrey1015: 看一下智財局的文章，似乎有討論到Random Art，但迴 03/02 21:47
→ jjeffrey1015: 避討論是不是受到著作權保障 03/02 21:47
→ jjeffrey1015: 這則新聞讓我想到無限猴子理論 03/02 21:50
推 piglauhk: 根據版權法，數位就是事實； 這數位是什麼意思阿 請不吝 03/06 08:42
→ piglauhk: 指教 03/06 08:42
推 piglauhk: 這原文的fact應該是全大寫的(?) 03/06 08:44
感謝
原文應該是這一段：
The pair developed an algorithm that recorded every potential 8-note, 12-beat
melody combination, going through every possible combination of notes and
working at a rate of 300,000 melodies per second. (In the MIDI format, notes
are numbers.) “Under copyright law, numbers are facts, and under copyright
law, facts either have thin copyright, almost no copyright, or no copyright
at all,” Riehl explained. “So maybe if these numbers have existed since the
beginning of time and we’re just plucking them out, maybe melodies are just
math, which is just facts, which is not copyrightable.”
這篇報導比較詳盡，除了說明他們概念的起源，
如何運用在流行音樂上，
也有提到學者對這項舉動的意見以及看法
https://reurl.cc/Aq1KmQ
Their point, ultimately, is that melodies could be seen as math, which is to
say facts, and facts cannot be copyrighted. This is not to say that songs
cannot be copyrighted, but that each possible series of notes is not a
creation so much as a selection from a fairly limited set. (Information
theorists might add that selection from a set of possibilities is the very
nature of all information—but that’s beyond the theoretical scope of the
melody project.)
略
“I just don’t get it,” Lawrence Lessig, an eminent copyright scholar at
Harvard Law School, told me in an email. “Whether or not melodies can be
represented in math, they are not just math. So that seems like a dead end.”
Lessig did agree that it’s unfair that anyone can be dinged for “copying”
work even if they could not be shown to have consciously done so. “The
whole doctrine of subconscious copying is absurd. So I get the motivation,”
he said.
Kristelia García, a law professor at the University of Colorado, saw things
in mostly the same way. “It’s an interesting thought experiment,” she told
me in an email. “And I think it does a good job of exposing the absurd point
we’ve reached in music copyright infringement.” But she didn’t think the
project could prevent copyright-infringement suits over melodies. “I am not
at all convinced it does what they hope it will do (i.e., give artists a free
pass out of infringement suits) since so many of their melodies are almost
certainly already ‘owned’ by someone else,” she said.
※ 編輯: jjeffrey1015 (42.74.94.35 臺灣), 03/06/2020 12:16:27
推 mango2014: 太棒了 03/06 17:18
推 yin0416: 這程式不難，重點是只有他們想到。 03/08 06:47